A******n And The Constitution
Nov 30, 2021 21:44:18 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
Because they wanted it kept quiet and out of the public eye. It would have been at that time a shameful thing to admit. It became a real issue when it became more public and openly supported by activists.
This is because our ancestors were of a much higher moral character than we are today. To try to conflate today on the times back then is ridiculous.
It was about womens rights not a******n.
Did they have right to safe legal a******ns ?
Did they have a right to choose safe legal a******ns.
Nov 30, 2021 23:15:31 #
JFlorio
Loc: Seminole Florida
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
A******n was known at that time...
It was, but it wasn’t prevalent or popular.
Dec 1, 2021 07:24:03 #
Ronald Hatt
Loc: Lansing, Mich
Liberty Tree wrote:
There is no Constitutional basis for a******n. It was just contrived by the Justices who created it. It should be a state issue.
A******n originated by *personally irresponsible women*, getting together, & demanding "rights/control"....over their bodies...simply because "it's their body"!
They are giving no thought to the *Sanctity of Human Life, & what the Bible says about a******n! Add their Heinous practice of "partial-birth a******n".....{ Murdering that baby, just before it takes its first breath}...by sucking the brains of the baby's skull! :O{{{ { Simply narcissism, to the Nth degree }
OOOOOOH! Women do not like to hear that.....: Where is their compassion in the first place?
If they were made to watch that "on-screen", while they "did that"...{ Doctors}.....This heinous practice would not last very long!
Dec 1, 2021 07:42:39 #
Dec 1, 2021 08:32:38 #
woodguru wrote:
There is no constitutional basis for not having a******n,
Many people consider it to be murder. The old 'right to life' concept.....
Dec 1, 2021 09:26:58 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
There is no Constitutional basis for a******n. It was just contrived by the Justices who created it. It should be a state issue.
How can you be free if you don't have the right to control your own body? Or does the constitution allow for freedom?
Dec 1, 2021 09:27:39 #
American Vet wrote:
Many people consider it to be murder. The old 'right to life' concept.....
And many don't!
Dec 1, 2021 09:30:04 #
Ronald Hatt wrote:
A******n originated by *personally irresponsible w... (show quote)
We are a secular country with separation between Church and State so what the bible says is totally and completely irrelevant...and if men have a right to control their own bodies doesn't it follow suit that a woman does too?
Dec 1, 2021 09:46:08 #
microphor
Loc: Home is TN
woodguru wrote:
There is no constitutional basis for not having a******n, it's up to each individual and those that are against it are because of religious reasons...they have nothing to do with the constitution.
The only reason we are here is a supreme court packed with blatantly religiously biased people...take the religion out of the issue and we have an a******n legal country
The only reason we are here is a supreme court packed with blatantly religiously biased people...take the religion out of the issue and we have an a******n legal country
No Woody, you are wrong. Not all of us who are against a******n are religious. I do not practice any form of religion and do not believe in "a******n at will". It's the unreasonable/unnecessary taking of a life if it's not for medical purposes.
Dec 1, 2021 09:58:05 #
Dec 1, 2021 10:44:12 #
PeterS wrote:
How can you be free if you don't have the right to control your own body? Or does the constitution allow for freedom?
An unborn child is not part of the woman's body. Follow the science.
Dec 1, 2021 10:45:09 #
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
A******n was known at that time...
I cannot believe this. Why wasn’t it mentioned in the Constitution then? They weren’t as evil then as we seem to be now, so we shouldn’t judge them by our low standards.
Dec 1, 2021 11:59:58 #
TexaCan
Loc: Homeward Bound!
woodguru wrote:
There is no constitutional basis for not having a******n, it's up to each individual and those that are against it are because of religious reasons...they have nothing to do with the constitution.
The only reason we are here is a supreme court packed with blatantly religiously biased people...take the religion out of the issue and we have an a******n legal country
The only reason we are here is a supreme court packed with blatantly religiously biased people...take the religion out of the issue and we have an a******n legal country
Some of us are just pro-human……..and against murder! Just that simple!
Dec 1, 2021 12:00:53 #
TexaCan
Loc: Homeward Bound!
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
A******n was known at that time...
Thank you, Professor! 😂
Dec 1, 2021 12:28:33 #
American Vet wrote:
An unborn child is not part of the woman's body. Follow the science.
Then there is no need for a woman at all is there...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.