A******n And The Constitution
Nov 30, 2021 19:38:47 #
There is no Constitutional basis for a******n. It was just contrived by the Justices who created it. It should be a state issue.
Nov 30, 2021 19:43:27 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
There is no Constitutional basis for a******n. It was just contrived by the Justices who created it. It should be a state issue.
The Constitution authors could not even have imagined the murder of a baby or anyone else for that matter. Those authors were Christians.
Nov 30, 2021 19:45:37 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
There is no Constitutional basis for a******n. It was just contrived by the Justices who created it. It should be a state issue.
There is no constitutional basis for not having a******n, it's up to each individual and those that are against it are because of religious reasons...they have nothing to do with the constitution.
The only reason we are here is a supreme court packed with blatantly religiously biased people...take the religion out of the issue and we have an a******n legal country
Nov 30, 2021 19:46:01 #
Carol Kelly wrote:
The Constitution authors could not even have imagined the murder of a baby or anyone else for that matter. Those authors were Christians.
A******n was known at that time...
Nov 30, 2021 19:46:49 #
Carol Kelly wrote:
The Constitution authors could not even have imagined the murder of a baby or anyone else for that matter. Those authors were Christians.
They used knitting needles and abortive herbs in those days, but a******n there was to be sure
Nov 30, 2021 19:46:56 #
Nov 30, 2021 19:48:12 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
Known, but not supported
Not supported, but not talked about either, people were left to deal with their own dirty laundry
Nov 30, 2021 19:52:46 #
Carol Kelly wrote:
The Constitution authors could not even have imagined the murder of a baby or anyone else for that matter. Those authors were Christians.
Since it is not in the Constitution it belongs to the states. 10th amendment.
Nov 30, 2021 19:53:17 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
Known, but not supported
It wasn't illegal...
Nov 30, 2021 20:02:39 #
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
It wasn't illegal...
Because they wanted it kept quiet and out of the public eye. It would have been at that time a shameful thing to admit. It became a real issue when it became more public and openly supported by activists.
Nov 30, 2021 20:16:45 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
Known, but not supported
You don't have to be religious to oppose a******n...just civilized.
Nov 30, 2021 20:36:21 #
Ricktloml wrote:
You don't have to be religious to oppose a******n...just civilized.
True!
Nov 30, 2021 20:59:40 #
manning5
Loc: Richmond, VA
Liberty Tree wrote:
True!
There are laws on the books against k*****gs or murders throughout the nation. An a******n is a k*****g or murder. Religion is not necessary to solve the issue, since we abhor k*****gs or murder in the first place, enough to pass the laws in any event. Do not k**l is a fundamental law originally published under Hammurabi in the far past, well before Christianity took hold. (This leads to the concept of Just K*****g, and further to the concept of Just War.)
Are there souls here that do not abhor k*****gs/murder? A******nists, and those who receive an a******n, I guess, accept k*****gs!
Nov 30, 2021 21:25:23 #
Nov 30, 2021 21:29:54 #
Liberty Tree wrote:
Because they wanted it kept quiet and out of the public eye. It would have been at that time a shameful thing to admit. It became a real issue when it became more public and openly supported by activists.
Perhaps they should have written it into the Constitution???
It's still shameful today...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.