Though I cannot understand the choice to not wear mask or take v*****e, aiding and abetting the spread of the v***s is macabre Looney Tunes (Page 3): Good for them, I don't know about...

Cuda2020

Rose42 wrote:

The vast majority recover with no issues

Good for them, I don't know about the vast majority, do you really, or is that another assumption? I think it is. The people we're concerned about are not the people who bounce back.

Cuda2020

Wonttakeitanymore wrote:

We who have had C***d have lifetime immunities! Bug off and hide!

Typical Trumpy attitude, not further than your own nose.

Rose42

Cuda2020 wrote:

Good for them, I don't know about the vast majority, do you really, or is that another assumption? I think it is. The people we're concerned about are not the people who bounce back.

No assumption.

Cuda2020

JFlorio wrote:

Had nothing to do with me disparaging someone for getting the v*****e. Has to do with those that are v******ted telling everyone else what to do and taking as "gospel" the proclamations from the politicians that write rules for the sheeple, but do not follow themselves.

Calling people sheeple is a derogatory term, and why, simply because they're doing what the scientific data says. I don't believe people should tell others what to do or to insult over disagreeing, and yes it goes both ways. People should do what is right for themselves and their family, and that is including the right to your own body, maybe you now see the over reach, or maybe not.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Cuda2020 wrote:

Typical Trumpy attitude, not further than your own nose.

Typical Bidenette. Believe you have the right to tell others what they must do.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Cuda2020 wrote:

Calling people sheeple is a derogatory term, and why, simply because they're doing what the scientific data says. I don't believe people should tell others what to do or to insult over disagreeing, and yes it goes both ways. People should do what is right for themselves and their family, and that is including the right to your own body, maybe you now see the over reach, or maybe not.

No they aren't. They are doing exactly what the government says. Mandates? Make any sense for companies with 100 employees must get v******ted but congress and their staffs are exempt? I******s pouring in daily aren't mandated, yet you don't care because daddy Joe didn't say they must.
I know the convoluted argument you are trying to bring up, using a******n. Not remotely the same thing. The v*****e is seen as a way to protect a life. A******n is seen as ending a life. To equate the two is ridiculous.

Cuda2020

JFlorio wrote:

Typical Bidenette. Believe you have the right to tell others what they must do.

Where did I tell anyone what to do, is your brain oxygen deprived, I said the complete opposite. My quote."People should do what is right for themselves and their family."

Cuda2020

JFlorio wrote:

No they aren't. They are doing exactly what the go... (show quote)

You don't relate the two cause you don't get it and probably never will. Of course they're the same, your body, your right, your choice, and what to do with it, end of story... not the governments. You want to change that narrative to suit your own agenda and belief, it doesn't work that way when we have our own rights, I don't have to live by your ideologies and you don't have to live by mine.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Cuda2020 wrote:

Where did I tell anyone what to do, is your brain oxygen deprived, I said the complete opposite. My quote."People should do what is right for themselves and their family."

My apologies. Had you mixed up with someone else. The fact remains people who take this v*****e just because it is mandated are sheeple. Especially when there are carveouts for others.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Cuda2020 wrote:

You don't relate the two cause you don't get it and probably never will. Of course they're the same, your body, your right, your choice, and what to do with it, end of story... not the governments. You want to change that narrative to suit your own agenda and belief, it doesn't work that way when we have our own rights, I don't have to live by your ideologies and you don't have to live by mine.

Of course they are not the same if you believe as I do a fetus is a life. When you take the v*****e you are making a decision for only yourself. If you believe as I do and terminate a pregnancy you are terminating a life. In your world I don't live by your ideologies and you don't live by mine, and the unborn have no choice. You don't get it and probably never will.

Cuda2020

JFlorio wrote:

Of course they are not the same if you believe as I do a fetus is a life. When you take the v*****e you are making a decision for only yourself. If you believe as I do and terminate a pregnancy you are terminating a life. In your world I don't live by your ideologies and you don't live by mine, and the unborn have no choice. You don't get it and probably never will.

Just because it is life is ridiculous, sperm is life, an ameba is life, a cell is life, how far do you want to take that scenario. This is why courts go by the distinction of when a human being is formed. Still it is not any ones moral choice but the person who is "choosing" to grow one. They are not public incubators, they are people, individuals with free choice to their own body. Bottom line, the Government stays OUT.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Cuda2020 wrote:

Just because it is life is ridiculous, sperm is life, an ameba is life, a cell is life, how far do you want to take that scenario. This is why courts go by the distinction of when a human being is formed. Still it is not any ones moral choice but the person who is "choosing" to grow one. They are not public incubators, they are people, individuals with free choice to their own body. Bottom line, the Government stays OUT.

You must be an atheist. So, we will never persuade each other either way.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Might want to take your own advice and follow the science. Or do you follow the science only when it agrees with your ideology? In over 90% of the time a choice was made by the incubator and the donor.

Cuda2020 wrote:

Just because it is life is ridiculous, sperm is life, an ameba is life, a cell is life, how far do you want to take that scenario. This is why courts go by the distinction of when a human being is formed. Still it is not any ones moral choice but the person who is "choosing" to grow one. They are not public incubators, they are people, individuals with free choice to their own body. Bottom line, the Government stays OUT.

Cuda2020

JFlorio wrote:

Might want to take your own advice and follow the science. Or do you follow the science only when it agrees with your ideology? In over 90% of the time a choice was made by the incubator and the donor.

I do follow the science, that's why it's my argument is{NOT when *Life* begins.} Life begins is every live sperm, does that make every man a mass murderer every time he does *not ejaculate* into a woman?

You're projecting again.

And it should be 100% not 90% and zero for government, or are we still practicing to be China?

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

No it’s not 100% choice unfortunately. In the case of rape I’m sure the incubator, as you call them didn’t choose to have sex.
I wasn’t talking about when life begins. In the case of humans life cannot begin without both the female egg and the male sperm. Dumb argument. I was talking about the fact that a fetus can feel pain. So ripping one apart seems pretty barbaric. Just thinking about the t***h makes you uncomfortable, as it should. How much earlier will science prove a fetus is a life?

Cuda2020 wrote:

I do follow the science, that's why it's my argument is{NOT when *Life* begins.} Life begins is every live sperm, does that make every man a mass murderer every time he does *not ejaculate* into a woman?

You're projecting again.

And it should be 100% not 90% and zero for government, or are we still practicing to be China?