woodguru wrote:
You are operating on beliefs while I am going by statistics and the numbers...numbers based on last year's progression of C***d spreading through the summer, and how the exponential spread numbers work.
There is plenty of statistical significant regional information to get an early view of how this is replicating spreads in both v******ted areas and non v*****e regions. Areas with the highest rates of v******tion are experiencing very little hospitalizations, where the lowest regions are maxing out theirs to where they are sending people out to bigger areas. In Missouri the outsorce areas are inundated to where they are asking for emergency help.
You are operating on beliefs while I am going by s... (
show quote)
Yes - I agree that it is mutating. And the v*****e that you and everyone else just got will not work on those mutations. There are going to be anomalies all over the world because no human is alike and everyone reacts differently to the gene therapy drugs. Do you
really think that everyone everywhere will react the same way to treatment? Man, if you do then you're more of a wacko than I thought...and that's saying something.
proud republican wrote:
Would you feel the same about v*****e if Trump was still President?
Trump got v******ted. Also he'd probably be dead except for the experimental c***d treatment he received.
EmilyD wrote:
Yes - I agree that it is mutating. And the v*****e that you and everyone else just got will not work on those mutations. There are going to be anomalies all over the world because no human is alike and everyone reacts differently to the gene therapy drugs. Do you really think that everyone everywhere will react the same way to treatment? Man, if you do then you're more of a wacko than I thought...and that's saying something.
Do you have any understanding of mutations and what the dynamics are? The oproblem with understanding in depth science and facts is that ignorant people who choose to believe an alternative reality and set pof facts will never get to the more complicated facts.
If you have a relatively small pool of target susceptible hosts for the v***s to live in, the numbers of possible mutations drops accordingly. Simple statistics, it there are ten thousand possible hosts, and a far less likely chance of even getting it because of that, or you have a million, the reality of more cases doesn't just go up a hundred times, it goes up a thousand times because there are more t***smissions feeding the exponential growth.
You are trying to say yes this is a problem, but one we can't do anything about...yes there is and it's called a herd immunity, which you either get by immunizing a larger percentage of the population, or they get C***d and hundreds of thousands die.
proud republican wrote:
Why would he be dead???
Because he was so sick that it took an extra bump of extreme treatments to save him, something that costs $600k and is not available to many other people.
woodguru wrote:
Because he was so sick that it took an extra bump of extreme treatments to save him, something that costs $600k and is not available to many other people.
Good point. Taxpayers are paying billions of dollars for the big pharma gene therapy inoculations...but if people get too sick, the government that they trust so much is not going to spend the money that is necessary to make them better. That sounds about right.
When was the last time you heard of the long-studied and long-used Hydroxychloroquine pack, Ivermectin and Remdesivir (used for the Ebola outbreak) treatments? Not in a long while. Why do you think that is? They are cheap, approved, tested and have been used for decades. Aren't you even a little bit curious about why it is that they have been covered up by the media and pharmacies? The CDC (which is a privately owned business - NOT a government agency) donates large sums of money to the big pharmaceutical companies. Does that concern you at all??
If people are not asking questions like these (there are lots more questions you can ask, believe me), and just sticking their arms out to inject themselves with something that is unapproved, untested, never before used technology without doing any research, then all I can say is they deserve wh**ever consequences happen to them.
woodguru wrote:
And unlike your komrade on OPP, I have no problem if those who are not smart enough to get v******ted respond, try to keep it civil and halfway intelligent.
I respect the rights of people to make their own decisions, but I also think that decisions have consequences that people should take responsibility for. You have an opportunity to get a v*****e that taxpayers paid billions of dollars for that costs you nothing. We are at the 200 million people v******ted point...more people are dying of C***d that have had problems with getting a v*****e than the ones that have. Even those who got the v*****e and then get C***d because they are exposed to it from people that haven't are not being hospitalized except in rare cases.
So do we as a society that paid big money for one of the better v*****es in history, have any obligation to pay for people who are not smart enough to get v******ted?
Seriously, it's your choice not to get a v***s that will cost hundreds of thousands of dollars if you are hospitalized, where is the expectancy that you take responsibility for your bad decision? I personally think that if you need emergency care that cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, unless you have insurance the bill for your ignorance should be coming out of your estate.
If god is your copilot here pray, but take responsibility for your own ignorance.
And unlike your komrade on OPP, I have no problem ... (
show quote)
I will donate my v*****e to you
jarlaxle
Loc: Locked in Robert L Peter's basement... HELP
woodguru wrote:
And unlike your komrade on OPP, I have no problem if those who are not smart enough to get v******ted respond, try to keep it civil and halfway intelligent.
I respect the rights of people to make their own decisions, but I also think that decisions have consequences that people should take responsibility for. You have an opportunity to get a v*****e that taxpayers paid billions of dollars for that costs you nothing. We are at the 200 million people v******ted point...more people are dying of C***d that have had problems with getting a v*****e than the ones that have. Even those who got the v*****e and then get C***d because they are exposed to it from people that haven't are not being hospitalized except in rare cases.
So do we as a society that paid big money for one of the better v*****es in history, have any obligation to pay for people who are not smart enough to get v******ted?
Seriously, it's your choice not to get a v***s that will cost hundreds of thousands of dollars if you are hospitalized, where is the expectancy that you take responsibility for your bad decision? I personally think that if you need emergency care that cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, unless you have insurance the bill for your ignorance should be coming out of your estate.
If god is your copilot here pray, but take responsibility for your own ignorance.
And unlike your komrade on OPP, I have no problem ... (
show quote)
How is it a v*****e if you take it and still get this v***s?
woodguru wrote:
And unlike your komrade on OPP, I have no problem if those who are not smart enough to get v******ted respond, try to keep it civil and halfway intelligent.
I respect the rights of people to make their own decisions, but I also think that decisions have consequences that people should take responsibility for. You have an opportunity to get a v*****e that taxpayers paid billions of dollars for that costs you nothing. We are at the 200 million people v******ted point...more people are dying of C***d that have had problems with getting a v*****e than the ones that have. Even those who got the v*****e and then get C***d because they are exposed to it from people that haven't are not being hospitalized except in rare cases.
So do we as a society that paid big money for one of the better v*****es in history, have any obligation to pay for people who are not smart enough to get v******ted?
Seriously, it's your choice not to get a v***s that will cost hundreds of thousands of dollars if you are hospitalized, where is the expectancy that you take responsibility for your bad decision? I personally think that if you need emergency care that cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, unless you have insurance the bill for your ignorance should be coming out of your estate.
If god is your copilot here pray, but take responsibility for your own ignorance.
And unlike your komrade on OPP, I have no problem ... (
show quote)
I agree with you, but why stop there ? Every day drug addicts, alcoholics, and i******s show up in ERs with no insurance and use up medical resources. What is your answer for that ? Most don't have an estate.
I’m sorry but I really don’t care what we spent on the v*****e, I don’t care to put that in my body. It is NOT a FDA approved v*****e, if was given an exemption. As I understand it this is the first C***D v*****e to go directly to humans. All other C***D v*****es never made it thru animal trails.
woodguru wrote:
And unlike your komrade on OPP, I have no problem if those who are not smart enough to get v******ted respond, try to keep it civil and halfway intelligent.
I respect the rights of people to make their own decisions, but I also think that decisions have consequences that people should take responsibility for. You have an opportunity to get a v*****e that taxpayers paid billions of dollars for that costs you nothing. We are at the 200 million people v******ted point...more people are dying of C***d that have had problems with getting a v*****e than the ones that have. Even those who got the v*****e and then get C***d because they are exposed to it from people that haven't are not being hospitalized except in rare cases.
So do we as a society that paid big money for one of the better v*****es in history, have any obligation to pay for people who are not smart enough to get v******ted?
Seriously, it's your choice not to get a v***s that will cost hundreds of thousands of dollars if you are hospitalized, where is the expectancy that you take responsibility for your bad decision? I personally think that if you need emergency care that cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, unless you have insurance the bill for your ignorance should be coming out of your estate.
If god is your copilot here pray, but take responsibility for your own ignorance.
And unlike your komrade on OPP, I have no problem ... (
show quote)
so, you ask others to keep it civil while implying they are not smart if they don't agree with you. How smart is that?
4522chief wrote:
I’m sorry but I really don’t care what we spent on the v*****e, I don’t care to put that in my body. It is NOT a FDA approved v*****e, if was given an exemption. As I understand it this is the first C***D v*****e to go directly to humans. All other C***D v*****es never made it thru animal trails.
The man that invented the M-RNA technology, Dr. Robert Malone, has explained why this technology is the wrong one to be using as a "v*****e" for the masses. He has studied it since 1987 when the AIDS v***s appeared. He started testing it on tadpoles and frogs...then ferrets and cats and many other animals. In ALL his tests (and many other researchers who were conducting these tests at the Salk Institute in California), the M-RNA spike protein was expressed by every single animal (that means it was rejected, and the animals died!) He has explained in great detail why people should not be taking this into their systems.
One of the main things that sticks out with what Dr. Malone says is: What they thought would be a substance that would aid the i****e s****m in attacking v***ses, they discovered after testing that it actually attacks our i****e s****m and travels through our whole body, including our brains, and causes a myriad of problems. Different people experience different reactions all throughout the body. Wherever there is a weakness (heart, kidneys, lungs, brain, etc.), the M-RNA protein attacks, and people get sick (and some die) from that attack. Furthermore, they don't know WHEN the weakness that is being attacked by the M-RNA protein will finally give way to sickness or death. It could be soon, or it could be any time in the future.
He likens it to cancer.Here is a video where Dr. Malone explains all this. The technology is complicated, but I like this video because the interviewer, Del Bigtree, joins Dr. Malone in urging him to explain in lay terms, so nobody will be confused, exactly what the Doctor is saying, and why he is absolutely sure that this gene therapy inoculation is so wrong.
https://www.b***hute.com/video/wtPKDJzKJOTA/
microphor wrote:
so, you ask others to keep it civil while implying they are not smart if they don't agree with you. How smart is that?
Woodie is the typical run of the mill lefty hypocrite.
And his major delusions lean heavily on a self importance.
4522chief wrote:
I’m sorry but I really don’t care what we spent on the v*****e, I don’t care to put that in my body. It is NOT a FDA approved v*****e, if was given an exemption. As I understand it this is the first C***D v*****e to go directly to humans. All other C***D v*****es never made it thru animal trails.
I respect and support your decision 100%
Michael Rich wrote:
Woodie is the typical run of the mill lefty hypocrite.
And his major delusions lean heavily on a self importance.
he certainly comes off as arrogant and narcissistic.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.