Old Thinker wrote:
You got all that from his quote?... I didn't read any of that.. but you can find lot's of evidence of lying if you look for it... btw... Mike Lindell is offering $5,000,000.00 to anyone that can prove his evidence is fraudulent... go for it, show me that evidence and collect...
I'd need to see his evidence. Can you send it to me. Pdf please.
Pm me.
RandyBrian wrote:
You really ARE delusional, aren't you?
Show me where I said, or even implied, ANY of your above remarks. You can't, because I haven't.
That's pretty easy by rereading your post.
useful mattoid 45 wrote:
I assumed you can read.
Come on, Useless! You claim I said the following:
Quote:
"So the r****rs had evidence of a s****n e******n?
Conservatives have evidence that c***d is a h**x?
That doctors are lying to get you to take the jab?
That the v*****e has a microchip?
That is makes you sterile?"
I have never ever uttered even one of these sentences. Nor have I implied a single one of them.
SO:
Let's try this again. Either SHOW where I have said any such thing,
OR Admit that you made a stupid mistake and are attributing someone else's words to me,
OR Admit that you are lying in order to protect your narrative.
RandyBrian wrote:
Come on, Useless! You claim I said the following:
Quote:
"So the r****rs had evidence of a s****n e******n?
Conservatives have evidence that c***d is a h**x?
That doctors are lying to get you to take the jab?
That the v*****e has a microchip?
That is makes you sterile?"
I have never ever uttered even one of these sentences. Nor have I implied a single one of them.
SO:
Let's try this again. Either SHOW where I have said any such thing,
OR Admit that you made a stupid mistake and are attributing someone else's words to me,
OR Admit that you are lying in order to protect your narrative.
Come on, Useless! You claim I said the following:... (
show quote)
Most likely it's all of those, Randy. Useless tries to spin people's words around, putting them on the defensive. And then he does what he just did to you: He took your words out of context and added a few of his own "extra" words to make it LOOK like you said these things, but really didn't. For instance, his use of the word "evidence": He said
"So the r****rs had evidence of a s****n e******n?", when what you said was:
"But the vast majority of them {the r****rs}
were (and probably still are) convinced the e******n had been stolen and were struggling to right a wrong, to PROTECT our country and our democracy from being stolen via fraud." Nowhere in that quote of yours, nor in any other of your posts, did you say the r****rs had
"evidence" of a s****n e******n!! By twisting things around and adding his own "flavor" to YOUR quote, he tries to make you look like you are the A$$#OLE when what he is doing is way beyond being an A$$#OLE!! It's deceitful, dishonest and could even be called
libel!! People sue other people for saying lesser lies than he does here on a regular basis!!
He is known for doing this "trick" of his by a lot of people here on OPP (and I suspect other places he posts and talks to people). IMO? It's best to just ignore him when he posts a response, knowing it's going to be a lie.
EmilyD wrote:
Most likely it's all of those, Randy. Useless tries to spin people's words around, putting them on the defensive. And then he does what he just did to you: He took your words out of context and added a few of his own "extra" words to make it LOOK like you said these things, but really didn't. For instance, his use of the word "evidence": He said "So the r****rs had evidence of a s****n e******n?", when what you said was: "But the vast majority of them {the r****rs} were (and probably still are) convinced the e******n had been stolen and were struggling to right a wrong, to PROTECT our country and our democracy from being stolen via fraud." Nowhere in that quote of yours, nor in any other of your posts, did you say the r****rs had "evidence" of a s****n e******n!! By twisting things around and adding his own "flavor" to YOUR quote, he tries to make you look like you are the A$$#OLE when what he is doing is way beyond being an A$$#OLE!! It's deceitful, dishonest and could even be called libel!! People sue other people for saying lesser lies than he does here on a regular basis!!
He is known for doing this "trick" of his by a lot of people here on OPP (and I suspect other places he posts and talks to people). IMO? It's best to just ignore him when he posts a response, knowing it's going to be a lie.
Most likely it's all of those, Randy. Useless trie... (
show quote)
Thanks for the information, Emily. I do tend to give people the benefit of a doubt, until they prove I shouldn't. I just never noticed this habit of his. However, I do not doubt that you are correct.
That puts Useless firmly in the same category as Milosia and Airforceone, and a few others. Absolutely despicable excuses for human beings, who will lie, twist, malign, or anything else to try to score 'points' for their side. The really sad, and somewhat frightening, part about such amoral creatures is that they seem to believe wh**ever they are saying at any given moment.....even if it contradicts something they said a day or week before. No consistency, no logic. Complete and unrepentant hypocrites. They also tend to be cowards. Useless is doing the same thing Kitten Courageous does. When confronted with something they have lied about, and can not justify their statements, they both disappear for a little while, and then start posting on other threads, ignoring their prior lack of integrity.
I am starting to understand why they are so often referred to as 'trolls'.
RandyBrian wrote:
Thanks for the information, Emily. I do tend to give people the benefit of a doubt, until they prove I shouldn't. I just never noticed this habit of his. However, I do not doubt that you are correct.
That puts Useless firmly in the same category as Milosia and Airforceone, and a few others. Absolutely despicable excuses for human beings, who will lie, twist, malign, or anything else to try to score 'points' for their side. The really sad, and somewhat frightening, part about such amoral creatures is that they seem to believe wh**ever they are saying at any given moment.....even if it contradicts something they said a day or week before. No consistency, no logic. Complete and unrepentant hypocrites. They also tend to be cowards. Useless is doing the same thing Kitten Courageous does. When confronted with something they have lied about, and can not justify their statements, they both disappear for a little while, and then start posting on other threads, ignoring their prior lack of integrity.
I am starting to understand why they are so often referred to as 'trolls'.
Thanks for the information, Emily. I do tend to g... (
show quote)
Oh what a tangled web they weave!! Liars find it hard to keep track of all their tall tales, and do just what you say...disappear back into that tangled web and hide! I guess they think people will forget that they are liars when they reappear...sometimes with new usernames when they become too embarrassed to use the ones they've already corrupted with their deceit!
Since conservatives vet their info, per you, I just wanted to point out how silly and unfounded that is.
That's all.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.