Historians Say Trump Is Not The Worst President In History.. (Page 43): I believe the rule is only about all caps for the posts entirety. All bold in it's entirety I see has the same.

Cuda2020

Radiance3 wrote:

=================== br i b Bold as well as red ,... (show quote)

I believe the rule is only about all caps for the posts entirety. All bold in it's entirety I see has the same. It's considered yelling for the entire post, not just here on this forum but other forums also. It would be like going to a PTA meeting and standing up and yelling at everyone. Just saying.

moldyoldy

Cuda2020 wrote:

I believe the rule is only about all caps for the posts entirety. All bold in it's entirety I see has the same. It's considered yelling for the entire post, not just here on this forum but other forums also. It would be like going to a PTA meeting and standing up and yelling at everyone. Just saying.

I got f**gged for a title that had several words in caps, I had copied the title from the article that I posted. They mentioned that it could start a trend.

Cuda2020

Radiance3 wrote:

=================== br i b Bold as well as red ,... (show quote)

I never attacked you, I informed you how it is received. I mentioned it to you because you tend to do the entire post that way, Peter does not, it is to be used as an emphasis, if it isn't, it is considered shouting your entire post.

Cuda2020

moldyoldy wrote:

I got f**gged for a title that had several words in caps, I had copied the title from the article that I posted. They mentioned that it could start a trend.

Guess they somehow missed Radiance for some time now.

Cuda2020

Parky60 wrote:

One doesn't need to use bold or CAPS to be constantly rude and/or obnoxious. You're living proof of that.

Show me, I'm fairly respectful to individuals until they become personally offensive, so show me how many times you've insulted me personally to me me insulting you without instigation from you.

Radiance3

Cuda2020 wrote:

I believe the rule is only about all caps for the posts entirety. All bold in it's entirety I see has the same. It's considered yelling for the entire post, not just here on this forum but other forums also. It would be like going to a PTA meeting and standing up and yelling at everyone. Just saying.

===============
As I have said, go and ask the ADMIN to disallow those that offend you. Otherwise there are a number of posters on both sides using bold and colored items. You don't see that?

Why do you only yell at me? I've never been rude and obnoxious in my life. Growing up I was trained to follow all the virtues of my Christian faith. I did not violate the Admin policies. I complied with them. I will continue using bold and colored statements or words to emphasize the important message of what I write.

Fact of the matter is I like those posters using bolds, and colored ones. It directs me right to the point the importance of the message they trying to present.

You h**e me, that is why you only targeted ne for using those "emphasis." I don't care about that. It does not diminish who I am.

Hope you have a good day. Peace be with you!

Cuda2020

Radiance3 wrote:

=============== br i As I have said, go and ask t... (show quote)

Me? Where am I yelling? Some how you equate me hating you simply because I pointed out your writing entire posts were like yelling, how do you make that connection? I don't h**e you at all. I'm not trying to diminish who you are, I am only trying for us to communicate in a less aggressive manor, as Sing pointed out, sometimes the softer we speak the more people try and listen, not her exact words.

Radiance3

Cuda2020 wrote:

Me? Where am I yelling? Some how you equate me hating you simply because I pointed out your writing entire posts were like yelling, how do you make that connection? I don't h**e you at all. I'm not trying to diminish who you are, I am only trying for us to communicate in a less aggressive manor, as Sing pointed out, sometimes the softer we speak the more people try and listen, not her exact words.

==================
Your yelling in writing is calling me rude and obnoxious for using bold items. I am a Christian and I forgive you!

Bold and colored words and sentences are not aggressive. They are there for a purpose. It focuses on stressing the important part of the message. And I like them. So as most of the posters.

Cuda2020

Radiance3 wrote:

==================
Your yelling in writing is calling me rude and obnoxious for using bold items. I am a Christian and I forgive you!

Bold and colored words and sentences are not aggressive. .They are there for a purpose. It focuses on stressing the important part of the message. And I like them. So as most of the posters.

If I wrote in bold(in the beginning) it was to show you the example, which from your reply you now understand, which is good. I don't recall being rude or obnoxious, you'll have to point that out to me. I don't believe in my post I have anything to be forgiven for, nice twist though.

Radiance3

Cuda2020 wrote:

If I wrote in bold(in the beginning) it was to show you the example, which from your reply you now understand, which is good. I don't recall being rude or obnoxious, you'll have to point that out to me. I don't believe in my post I have anything to be forgiven for, nice twist though.

=================
You still didn't get it? What we were discussing here started when you called me "rude and obnoxious" for using bold letters. Don't you remember that? I will show you later. I have an appointment. I must leave now. See you later.

Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois

Cuda2020 wrote:

Show me, I'm fairly respectful to individuals until they become personally offensive, so show me how many times you've insulted me personally to me me insulting you without instigation from you.

You're nothing but a thin-skinned crybaby. Is that a good enough insult for you? Actually it's the t***h.

Cuda2020

Parky60 wrote:

You're nothing but a thin-skinned crybaby. Is that a good enough insult for you? Actually it's the t***h.

Oh yeah, um...Boo-hoo, it's all you do Sparky and very ineffective, carry on...It's too bad you don't have the mental capacity for a civil intelligent dialog.

Radiance3

woodguru wrote:

But damn he came close. He did qualify in some of the categories as worst though...

https://www.c-span.org/presidentsurvey2021/

Here's a recap and breakdown
https://www.rawstory.com/trump-cspan-historian-ranking/?utm_source=push_notifications

====================
Barack Obama is the worst president in US history.
https://play.google.com/store/audiobooks/details/The_Worst_President_in_History_The_Legacy_of_Barac?id=AQAAAIA2gksCbM&hl=en_US&gl=US

www.google.com&cid=CAASE-RoBFaW2Skqjw70owx7i8NcM1k&sig=AOD64_3DRH3_6UFctQHo7_ROtOpHtf-KYA&q&nis=1&adurl&ved=2ahUKEwidgtyi6YnyAhXUrZ4KHWwYABMQ0Qx6BAgCEAE" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">https://www.googleadservices.com/pagead/aclk?sa=L&ai=DChcSEwjcreai6YnyAhVlCecKHZlXAioYABAAGgJwdg&ae=2&ohost=www.google.com&cid=CAASE-RoBFaW2Skqjw70owx7i8NcM1k&sig=AOD64_3DRH3_6UFctQHo7_ROtOpHtf-KYA&q&nis=1&adurl&ved=2ahUKEwidgtyi6YnyAhXUrZ4KHWwYABMQ0Qx6BAgCEAE

https://www.cato.org/commentary/top-10-ways-obama-violated-constitution-during-presidency

https://www.forbes.com/sites/realspin/2013/12/23/president-obamas-top-10-constitutional-violations-of-2013/

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2017/01/obama-leaves-the-constitution-weaker-than-he-found-it/512015/

Radiance3

Cuda2020 wrote:

Me? Where am I yelling? Some how you equate me hating you simply because I pointed out your writing entire posts were like yelling, how do you make that connection? I don't h**e you at all. I'm not trying to diminish who you are, I am only trying for us to communicate in a less aggressive manor, as Sing pointed out, sometimes the softer we speak the more people try and listen, not her exact words.

================
I don't care whether you write bold or not. It does not interest me. Get lost from me.