YouTube Takes Down New Trump Interview
Feb 20, 2021 16:32:49 #
Radiance3 wrote:
=================
C***d19 was also the justifications for the Mail in B****ts. Then they have the reason to add more b****ts to Biden. Those b****ts with duplicate names, and no signatures were included. They filled boxes of those b****ts and when they see Biden is losing they pulled those boxes filled with questionable b****ts count them to make Biden win. That was one of their strategies, out of so many fraudulent means.,
C***d19 was also the justifications for the Mail in B****ts. Then they have the reason to add more b****ts to Biden. Those b****ts with duplicate names, and no signatures were included. They filled boxes of those b****ts and when they see Biden is losing they pulled those boxes filled with questionable b****ts count them to make Biden win. That was one of their strategies, out of so many fraudulent means.,
You, of course, have proof of this. So where is it and why hasn't it been presented before?
Feb 20, 2021 16:41:30 #
PeterS wrote:
You, of course, have proof of this. So where is it and why hasn't it been presented before?
Trump's lawyers presented the evidence but it was "thrown out" for some sort of procedural error and so the evidence was never heard by a court.
Feb 20, 2021 17:08:47 #
lpnmajor
Loc: Arkansas
[quote=Radiance3]YouTube Takes Down New Trump Interview
BY ZACHARY STIEBER February 20, 2021 Updated: February 20, 2021 biggersmaller Print
YouTube took down a newly recorded interview with former President Donald Trump in Google’s latest action against conservatives.
A Newsmax spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email that the company was told the Feb. 17 interview was removed because it violated YouTube’s community guidelines.
A Google spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email: “We have clear Community Guidelines that govern what videos may stay on YouTube, and we enforce our Community Guidelines consistently, regardless of speaker and without regard to political viewpoints.”
“In accordance with our p**********l e******n integrity policy, we removed this video from the Newsmax TV channel,” the spokesperson added.
The set of policies cited is aimed at preventing spam, s**ms, and deceptive practices, the California-based company says. Included is a policy implemented late last year. Google said in announcing the policy that it would remove “content that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. P**********l e******n.”
Trump during the Newsmax interview alleged he won the 2020 e******n, among other claims.
Trump made similar claims in interviews with Fox News this week. Those remain on YouTube.
The former president also spoke with One America News. That network hasn’t uploaded videos for approximately one month.
Newsmax later posted a video of host Greg Kelly, who interviewed Trump, summarizing and playing portions of the interview. That video remains live.
=======================
[b]YouTube has grossly violated the president's Constitutional First Amendment Rights.
Those Hi Tech Industries could not suppress the Constitutional rights of any individual, much more so with the president who could impart valuable information to the people.
You Tube and other Hi Tech Industries, like Tweeter, FB, could not remove the 1st amendment rights of the people when it affects constitutional rights. The guidelines of those Hi-Tech Industries must be subordinate under the provisions of the constitution. Anything over that is unconstitutional and unenforceable. [/quote]
BY ZACHARY STIEBER February 20, 2021 Updated: February 20, 2021 biggersmaller Print
YouTube took down a newly recorded interview with former President Donald Trump in Google’s latest action against conservatives.
A Newsmax spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email that the company was told the Feb. 17 interview was removed because it violated YouTube’s community guidelines.
A Google spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email: “We have clear Community Guidelines that govern what videos may stay on YouTube, and we enforce our Community Guidelines consistently, regardless of speaker and without regard to political viewpoints.”
“In accordance with our p**********l e******n integrity policy, we removed this video from the Newsmax TV channel,” the spokesperson added.
The set of policies cited is aimed at preventing spam, s**ms, and deceptive practices, the California-based company says. Included is a policy implemented late last year. Google said in announcing the policy that it would remove “content that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. P**********l e******n.”
Trump during the Newsmax interview alleged he won the 2020 e******n, among other claims.
Trump made similar claims in interviews with Fox News this week. Those remain on YouTube.
The former president also spoke with One America News. That network hasn’t uploaded videos for approximately one month.
Newsmax later posted a video of host Greg Kelly, who interviewed Trump, summarizing and playing portions of the interview. That video remains live.
=======================
[b]YouTube has grossly violated the president's Constitutional First Amendment Rights.
Those Hi Tech Industries could not suppress the Constitutional rights of any individual, much more so with the president who could impart valuable information to the people.
You Tube and other Hi Tech Industries, like Tweeter, FB, could not remove the 1st amendment rights of the people when it affects constitutional rights. The guidelines of those Hi-Tech Industries must be subordinate under the provisions of the constitution. Anything over that is unconstitutional and unenforceable. [/quote]
Feb 20, 2021 18:24:00 #
Kevyn wrote:
It is interesting to see morons pontificate about ... (show quote)
===================
Are you dumb? So you believe that Hi Tech Industries or anybody among the black race could create their own guidelines how to behave or how to carry their activities. Therefore they are above the law. That was what Barack Obama did violating so many provisions of the constitution. He basically replaced it.
No one is allowed to behave above the law. The constitution is our guideline to behave, and it has generous provisions for our freedom. That is the very essence of our constitutional-republic, freedom.
If that freedom is used not within its guideline, then that person violate the law, and subject to punishment. If you or anybody behave above the law, therefore you are subjected to punishment and compliance.
Repeat, are you dumb?
Feb 20, 2021 18:53:17 #
ChJoe wrote:
Trump's lawyers presented the evidence but it was "thrown out" for some sort of procedural error and so the evidence was never heard by a court.
A court doesn’t need to hear the same lies and nonsense over and over.
Feb 20, 2021 19:11:00 #
ChJoe wrote:
Trump's lawyers presented the evidence but it was "thrown out" for some sort of procedural error and so the evidence was never heard by a court.
Actually courts repeatedly patiently listed to the best case trump's attorneys could make, their cases being about making a case about how fraud could have happened, judges repeatedly asked if they had evidence supporting how much fraud could be proved, the answer was no sir we do not. More than one judge directly asked the attorneys if they personally could say there was in fact fraud, again attorneys answered no sir I cannot...because if they could not prove it they could lose their license to practice law.
There was no oroof of fraud, only proving how fraud could have occurred. These attorneys literally seemed to believe that they could make a plausible case for how fraud could have happened and the judge was supposed to reverse the e******n because of it.
Feb 20, 2021 20:47:54 #
PeterS wrote:
You, of course, have proof of this. So where is it and why hasn't it been presented before?
=======================
Presented when? Kevyn, are you so complicit with all these crimes of your c*******t party?
Why do you love this party? For handouts? That handouts will not last long. Once it is consumed then what you'll do will be working at the farm producing for the elites.
For now, if you honestly work, you can keep what you earned after paying taxes. Not when Biden becomes a c*******t dictator. He is now starting though. He'll keep everything you have and ration your food like an animal. E.g. a pig.
Feb 21, 2021 01:34:11 #
kemmer wrote:
A court doesn’t need to hear the same lies and nonsense over and over.
Lies? Trump could fill stadiums with people outside and slojoe couldn’t fill a room! He’s a corrupt piece of s**t
The e******n was absolutely stolen. The democrats have ALWAYS been noted for fraud! Not even one month in office and he’s already a disaster!
Feb 21, 2021 08:37:59 #
PeterS wrote:
You, of course, have proof of this. So where is it and why hasn't it been presented before?
====================
Because your eyes were closed and you have been sleeping. Did you have a nightmare?
Feb 21, 2021 12:41:59 #
kemmer wrote:
When Trump ditches that ridiculous e******n f***d shtick, maybe reputable media might carry his pathetic whining about losing the e******n.
===================
kemmer, you don't know what you are talking about cause of your gayness. You are just complicating yourself. You need to silent up to hide your ignorance.
Feb 21, 2021 12:58:03 #
[quote=Radiance3]YouTube Takes Down New Trump Interview
BY ZACHARY STIEBER February 20, 2021 Updated: February 20, 2021 biggersmaller Print
YouTube took down a newly recorded interview with former President Donald Trump in Google’s latest action against conservatives.
A Newsmax spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email that the company was told the Feb. 17 interview was removed because it violated YouTube’s community guidelines.
A Google spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email: “We have clear Community Guidelines that govern what videos may stay on YouTube, and we enforce our Community Guidelines consistently, regardless of speaker and without regard to political viewpoints.”
“In accordance with our p**********l e******n integrity policy, we removed this video from the Newsmax TV channel,” the spokesperson added.
The set of policies cited is aimed at preventing spam, s**ms, and deceptive practices, the California-based company says. Included is a policy implemented late last year. Google said in announcing the policy that it would remove “content that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. P**********l e******n.”
Trump during the Newsmax interview alleged he won the 2020 e******n, among other claims.
Trump made similar claims in interviews with Fox News this week. Those remain on YouTube.
The former president also spoke with One America News. That network hasn’t uploaded videos for approximately one month.
Newsmax later posted a video of host Greg Kelly, who interviewed Trump, summarizing and playing portions of the interview. That video remains live.
=======================
[b]YouTube has grossly violated the president's Constitutional First Amendment Rights.
Those Hi Tech Industries could not suppress the Constitutional rights of any individual, much more so with the president who could impart valuable information to the people.
You Tube and other Hi Tech Industries, like Tweeter, FB, could not remove the 1st amendment rights of the people when it affects constitutional rights. The guidelines of those Hi-Tech Industries must be subordinate under the provisions of the constitution. Anything over that is unconstitutional and unenforceable. [/quote]
"E******n Integrity" certainly they're not referring to this last e******n.
BY ZACHARY STIEBER February 20, 2021 Updated: February 20, 2021 biggersmaller Print
YouTube took down a newly recorded interview with former President Donald Trump in Google’s latest action against conservatives.
A Newsmax spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email that the company was told the Feb. 17 interview was removed because it violated YouTube’s community guidelines.
A Google spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email: “We have clear Community Guidelines that govern what videos may stay on YouTube, and we enforce our Community Guidelines consistently, regardless of speaker and without regard to political viewpoints.”
“In accordance with our p**********l e******n integrity policy, we removed this video from the Newsmax TV channel,” the spokesperson added.
The set of policies cited is aimed at preventing spam, s**ms, and deceptive practices, the California-based company says. Included is a policy implemented late last year. Google said in announcing the policy that it would remove “content that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. P**********l e******n.”
Trump during the Newsmax interview alleged he won the 2020 e******n, among other claims.
Trump made similar claims in interviews with Fox News this week. Those remain on YouTube.
The former president also spoke with One America News. That network hasn’t uploaded videos for approximately one month.
Newsmax later posted a video of host Greg Kelly, who interviewed Trump, summarizing and playing portions of the interview. That video remains live.
=======================
[b]YouTube has grossly violated the president's Constitutional First Amendment Rights.
Those Hi Tech Industries could not suppress the Constitutional rights of any individual, much more so with the president who could impart valuable information to the people.
You Tube and other Hi Tech Industries, like Tweeter, FB, could not remove the 1st amendment rights of the people when it affects constitutional rights. The guidelines of those Hi-Tech Industries must be subordinate under the provisions of the constitution. Anything over that is unconstitutional and unenforceable. [/quote]
"E******n Integrity" certainly they're not referring to this last e******n.
Feb 21, 2021 12:59:11 #
Radiance3 wrote:
===================
kemmer, you don't know what you are talking about cause of your gayness.
kemmer, you don't know what you are talking about cause of your gayness.
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
You are OPP’s biggest joke.
Feb 21, 2021 18:40:57 #
kemmer wrote:
When Trump ditches that ridiculous e******n f***d shtick, maybe reputable media might carry his pathetic whining about losing the e******n.
Read the 1st Amendment. C****es forbid freedom of speech.
Feb 21, 2021 19:42:42 #
woodguru wrote:
The first step to defining whether lies and deceiv... (show quote)
There were anomalies and allegations of fraud that were not allowed to be examined. The v****g machines experienced error rates astronomically higher than was legally permitted. The rejection rate of absentee/mail b****ts was a fraction of what it had been historically. It is ridiculous to believe that there was no fraud. The only question is how much fraud took place. There should be an audit of the e******n results. This needs to be done after every e******n to determine what worked and what didn't and what could be done to improve the e******n process and e******n security. Any fraud that is found should be prosecuted and the guilty should receive the maximum penalty.
Feb 21, 2021 23:13:52 #
woodguru wrote:
Actually courts repeatedly patiently listed to the... (show quote)
Then why has the Supreme Court agreed to hear from the lady attorney?
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.