YouTube Takes Down New Trump Interview
Feb 20, 2021 14:34:17 #
YouTube Takes Down New Trump Interview
BY ZACHARY STIEBER February 20, 2021 Updated: February 20, 2021 biggersmaller Print
YouTube took down a newly recorded interview with former President Donald Trump in Google’s latest action against conservatives.
A Newsmax spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email that the company was told the Feb. 17 interview was removed because it violated YouTube’s community guidelines.
A Google spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email: “We have clear Community Guidelines that govern what videos may stay on YouTube, and we enforce our Community Guidelines consistently, regardless of speaker and without regard to political viewpoints.”
“In accordance with our p**********l e******n integrity policy, we removed this video from the Newsmax TV channel,” the spokesperson added.
The set of policies cited is aimed at preventing spam, s**ms, and deceptive practices, the California-based company says. Included is a policy implemented late last year. Google said in announcing the policy that it would remove “content that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. P**********l e******n.”
Trump during the Newsmax interview alleged he won the 2020 e******n, among other claims.
Trump made similar claims in interviews with Fox News this week. Those remain on YouTube.
The former president also spoke with One America News. That network hasn’t uploaded videos for approximately one month.
Newsmax later posted a video of host Greg Kelly, who interviewed Trump, summarizing and playing portions of the interview. That video remains live.
=======================
[b]YouTube has grossly violated the president's Constitutional First Amendment Rights.
Those Hi Tech Industries could not suppress the Constitutional rights of any individual, much more so with the president who could impart valuable information to the people.
You Tube and other Hi Tech Industries, like Tweeter, FB, could not remove the 1st amendment rights of the people when it affects constitutional rights. The guidelines of those Hi-Tech Industries must be subordinate under the provisions of the constitution. Anything over that is unconstitutional and unenforceable.
BY ZACHARY STIEBER February 20, 2021 Updated: February 20, 2021 biggersmaller Print
YouTube took down a newly recorded interview with former President Donald Trump in Google’s latest action against conservatives.
A Newsmax spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email that the company was told the Feb. 17 interview was removed because it violated YouTube’s community guidelines.
A Google spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email: “We have clear Community Guidelines that govern what videos may stay on YouTube, and we enforce our Community Guidelines consistently, regardless of speaker and without regard to political viewpoints.”
“In accordance with our p**********l e******n integrity policy, we removed this video from the Newsmax TV channel,” the spokesperson added.
The set of policies cited is aimed at preventing spam, s**ms, and deceptive practices, the California-based company says. Included is a policy implemented late last year. Google said in announcing the policy that it would remove “content that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. P**********l e******n.”
Trump during the Newsmax interview alleged he won the 2020 e******n, among other claims.
Trump made similar claims in interviews with Fox News this week. Those remain on YouTube.
The former president also spoke with One America News. That network hasn’t uploaded videos for approximately one month.
Newsmax later posted a video of host Greg Kelly, who interviewed Trump, summarizing and playing portions of the interview. That video remains live.
=======================
[b]YouTube has grossly violated the president's Constitutional First Amendment Rights.
Those Hi Tech Industries could not suppress the Constitutional rights of any individual, much more so with the president who could impart valuable information to the people.
You Tube and other Hi Tech Industries, like Tweeter, FB, could not remove the 1st amendment rights of the people when it affects constitutional rights. The guidelines of those Hi-Tech Industries must be subordinate under the provisions of the constitution. Anything over that is unconstitutional and unenforceable.
Feb 20, 2021 14:45:32 #
[quote=Radiance3]YouTube Takes Down New Trump Interview
BY ZACHARY STIEBER February 20, 2021 Updated: February 20, 2021 biggersmaller Print
YouTube took down a newly recorded interview with former President Donald Trump in Google’s latest action against conservatives.
A Newsmax spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email that the company was told the Feb. 17 interview was removed because it violated YouTube’s community guidelines.
A Google spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email: “We have clear Community Guidelines that govern what videos may stay on YouTube, and we enforce our Community Guidelines consistently, regardless of speaker and without regard to political viewpoints.”
“In accordance with our p**********l e******n integrity policy, we removed this video from the Newsmax TV channel,” the spokesperson added.
The set of policies cited is aimed at preventing spam, s**ms, and deceptive practices, the California-based company says. Included is a policy implemented late last year. Google said in announcing the policy that it would remove “content that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. P**********l e******n.”
Trump during the Newsmax interview alleged he won the 2020 e******n, among other claims.
Trump made similar claims in interviews with Fox News this week. Those remain on YouTube.
The former president also spoke with One America News. That network hasn’t uploaded videos for approximately one month.
Newsmax later posted a video of host Greg Kelly, who interviewed Trump, summarizing and playing portions of the interview. That video remains live.
=======================
[b]YouTube has grossly violated the president's Constitutional First Amendment Rights.
Those Hi Tech Industries could not suppress the Constitutional rights of any individual, much more so with the president who could impart valuable information to the people.
[color=red]You Tube and other Hi Tech Industries, could not remove the rights of the people when it affects constitutional rights. The guidelines of those Hi-Tech Industries must be subordinate under the provisions of the constitution. Anything over that is unconstitutional and unenforceable. [/quote]
When Trump ditches that ridiculous e******n f***d shtick, maybe reputable media might carry his pathetic whining about losing the e******n.
BY ZACHARY STIEBER February 20, 2021 Updated: February 20, 2021 biggersmaller Print
YouTube took down a newly recorded interview with former President Donald Trump in Google’s latest action against conservatives.
A Newsmax spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email that the company was told the Feb. 17 interview was removed because it violated YouTube’s community guidelines.
A Google spokesperson told The Epoch Times via email: “We have clear Community Guidelines that govern what videos may stay on YouTube, and we enforce our Community Guidelines consistently, regardless of speaker and without regard to political viewpoints.”
“In accordance with our p**********l e******n integrity policy, we removed this video from the Newsmax TV channel,” the spokesperson added.
The set of policies cited is aimed at preventing spam, s**ms, and deceptive practices, the California-based company says. Included is a policy implemented late last year. Google said in announcing the policy that it would remove “content that misleads people by alleging that widespread fraud or errors changed the outcome of the 2020 U.S. P**********l e******n.”
Trump during the Newsmax interview alleged he won the 2020 e******n, among other claims.
Trump made similar claims in interviews with Fox News this week. Those remain on YouTube.
The former president also spoke with One America News. That network hasn’t uploaded videos for approximately one month.
Newsmax later posted a video of host Greg Kelly, who interviewed Trump, summarizing and playing portions of the interview. That video remains live.
=======================
[b]YouTube has grossly violated the president's Constitutional First Amendment Rights.
Those Hi Tech Industries could not suppress the Constitutional rights of any individual, much more so with the president who could impart valuable information to the people.
[color=red]You Tube and other Hi Tech Industries, could not remove the rights of the people when it affects constitutional rights. The guidelines of those Hi-Tech Industries must be subordinate under the provisions of the constitution. Anything over that is unconstitutional and unenforceable. [/quote]
When Trump ditches that ridiculous e******n f***d shtick, maybe reputable media might carry his pathetic whining about losing the e******n.
Feb 20, 2021 15:02:44 #
kemmer wrote:
When Trump ditches that ridiculous e******n f***d shtick, maybe reputable media might carry his pathetic whining about losing the e******n.
When I watched Trump fill up stadiums, with people still outside, and Biden couldn’t fill up a room and the shenanigans of different states it just doesn’t pass the smell test with me! The e******n was definitely stolen.
Feb 20, 2021 15:12:50 #
WaddlEroad wrote:
When I watched Trump fill up stadiums, with people still outside, and Biden couldn’t fill up a room and the shenanigans of different states it just doesn’t pass the smell test with me! The e******n was definitely stolen.
I think it's "interesting" that Biden says he doesn't want a crowd at his rallies and press conferences because of C***d, yet he had a crowd at his inauguration.
Yup...we have a hypocrite for a president now.
Feb 20, 2021 15:17:02 #
It is interesting to see morons pontificate about Twitter or YouTube violating anyone’s first amendment rights.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
You tube is not congress, they can’t make or enforce laws. They are incapable of violating anyone’s first amendment rights. They however have first amendment rights of their own that protect them from the government, in this case the president, or now disgraced ex president from forcing them to host content they don’t want to.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
You tube is not congress, they can’t make or enforce laws. They are incapable of violating anyone’s first amendment rights. They however have first amendment rights of their own that protect them from the government, in this case the president, or now disgraced ex president from forcing them to host content they don’t want to.
Feb 20, 2021 15:34:04 #
Kevyn wrote:
It is interesting to see morons pontificate about ... (show quote)
Yes, Youtube has the right to slant anything they want to. And they slant way to the left. It's all part of the new "America Last" program of our new President's administration. (I don't say it is his program because he doesn't know his a$$ from his elbow), but you know - the "Make America Socialist" program...
Feb 20, 2021 15:44:56 #
EmilyD wrote:
I think it's "interesting" that Biden says he doesn't want a crowd at his rallies and press conferences because of C***d, yet he had a crowd at his inauguration.
Yup...we have a hypocrite for a president now.
Yup...we have a hypocrite for a president now.
=================
C***d19 was also the justifications for the Mail in B****ts. Then they have the reason to add more b****ts to Biden. Those b****ts with duplicate names, and no signatures were included. They filled boxes of those b****ts and when they see Biden is losing they pulled those boxes filled with questionable b****ts count them to make Biden win. That was one of their strategies, out of so many fraudulent means.,
Feb 20, 2021 15:51:15 #
WaddlEroad wrote:
When I watched Trump fill up stadiums, with people still outside, and Biden couldn’t fill up a room and the shenanigans of different states it just doesn’t pass the smell test with me! The e******n was definitely stolen.
That's all you got, stadiums filled with c***d denying fools when Biden has a party of people intelligent enough not to go to a stadium?
Your smeller is broken if you could listen to the horse crap trump regurgitated non stop...why go to a trump rally to hear the same exact BS and rhetoric every time?
Feb 20, 2021 15:52:55 #
EmilyD wrote:
I think it's "interesting" that Biden says he doesn't want a crowd at his rallies and press conferences because of C***d, yet he had a crowd at his inauguration.
Yup...we have a hypocrite for a president now.
Yup...we have a hypocrite for a president now.
That wasn't a crowd, unless you put it against trumps inauguration "crowd" in a non C***d era.
Feb 20, 2021 15:56:02 #
Radiance3 wrote:
=================
C***d19 was also the justifications for the Mail in B****ts. Then they have the reason to add more b****ts to Biden. Those b****ts with duplicate names, and no signatures were included. They filled boxes of those b****ts and when they see Biden is losing they pulled those boxes filled with questionable b****ts count them to make Biden win. That was one of their strategies, out of so many fraudulent means.,
C***d19 was also the justifications for the Mail in B****ts. Then they have the reason to add more b****ts to Biden. Those b****ts with duplicate names, and no signatures were included. They filled boxes of those b****ts and when they see Biden is losing they pulled those boxes filled with questionable b****ts count them to make Biden win. That was one of their strategies, out of so many fraudulent means.,
Absolutely! When Trump could fill up a stadium, with people still outside, and Biden couldn’t fill up a room you know something stinks to high heaven!
Feb 20, 2021 15:59:35 #
Kevyn wrote:
It is interesting to see morons pontificate about Twitter or YouTube violating anyone’s first amendment rights.
The first step to defining whether lies and deceiving people are freedom of speech...
Ever hear of t***h in advertising laws? Yes, there are laws designed to protect people from unscrupulous companies that would lie to people to sell their products. The argument by the right that wanted to protect a manufacturer's rights was that this infringed on their freedom of speech.
Lying and deceiving people into believing purely untrue facts is dangerous...Facebook and youtube are trying to establish battlegrounds against the things we know are lies. The fact that tens of millions of people already believe something does not make ot true, in fact it proves the need to regulate FOX and other media outlets the same way.
Feb 20, 2021 16:00:30 #
woodguru wrote:
That's all you got, stadiums filled with c***d denying fools when Biden has a party of people intelligent enough not to go to a stadium?
Your smeller is broken if you could listen to the horse crap trump regurgitated non stop...why go to a trump rally to hear the same exact BS and rhetoric every time?
Your smeller is broken if you could listen to the horse crap trump regurgitated non stop...why go to a trump rally to hear the same exact BS and rhetoric every time?
How many people attended Biden's inauguration at the Capitol? 2,000. How many attended the parties afterward? tens of thousands. The inauguration was just a show. He doesn't give a crap about C***d. If he did, he wouldn't open the borders up.
Feb 20, 2021 16:04:17 #
[quote=Kevyn]It is interesting to see morons pontificate about Twitter or YouTube violating anyone’s first amendment rights.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
You tube is not congress, they can’t make or enforce laws. They are incapable of violating anyone’s first amendment rights. They however have first amendment rights of their own that protect them from the government, in this case the president, or now disgraced ex president from forcing them to host content they don’t want to.[/quote
Disgraced for what? Tell me how he was disgraced. How are they not violating first amendment rights? Australia is thinking about banning fb from their country along with other countries because they have decided they can pick and choose what’s allowed to post.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
You tube is not congress, they can’t make or enforce laws. They are incapable of violating anyone’s first amendment rights. They however have first amendment rights of their own that protect them from the government, in this case the president, or now disgraced ex president from forcing them to host content they don’t want to.[/quote
Disgraced for what? Tell me how he was disgraced. How are they not violating first amendment rights? Australia is thinking about banning fb from their country along with other countries because they have decided they can pick and choose what’s allowed to post.
Feb 20, 2021 16:12:48 #
Kitten Courageous
Loc: The Derelict Ship Maggie's Revenge
A private enterprise is not a government enterprise. Private companies are not obligated to provide anything offered in the Constitution. Only the government grants you Free Speech, BUT not all speech is free.
Feb 20, 2021 16:28:34 #
Kevyn wrote:
It is interesting to see morons pontificate about ... (show quote)
How many times have we heard you l*****ts proclaim that the NFL was violating Kaepernik's first amendment rights? If that is the case, the by definition, when Twitter censors opinions, they are also violating the first amendment.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.