One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Can You Guess What the Increase in Gun Sales Has Done to Crime?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
Aug 1, 2014 15:51:29   #
Ve'hoe
 
Except I suppose that your facts are garbage...here are two actual examples that debunk the "logic" that you used.

"Massachusetts has a national reputation as a bastion of gun control, but crimes and injuries related to firearms have risen — sometimes dramatically — since the state passed a comprehensive package of gun laws in 1998.

Murders committed with firearms have increased significantly, aggravated assaults and robberies involving guns have risen, and gunshot injuries are up, according to FBI and state data."

"Murder and violent crime rates were supposed to soar after the Supreme Court struck down gun control laws in Chicago and Washington, D.C.
Politicians predicted disaster. "More handguns in the District of Columbia will only lead to more handgun violence," Washington’s Mayor Adrian Fenty warned the day the court made its decision.

Chicago’s Mayor Daley predicted that we would "go back to the Old West, you have a gun and I have a gun and we'll settle it in the streets . . . ."

The New York Times even editorialized this month about the Supreme Court's "unwise" decision that there is a right for people "to keep guns in the home."

But Armageddon never happened. Newly released data for Chicago shows that, as in Washington, murder and gun crime rates didn't rise after the bans were eliminated -- they plummeted. They have fallen much more than the national crime rate.
Not surprisingly, the national media have been completely silent about this news.
One can only imagine the coverage if crime rates had risen. In the first six months of this year, there were 14% fewer murders in Chicago compared to the first six months of last year – back when owning handguns was illegal. It was the largest drop in Chicago’s murder rate since the handgun ban went into effect in 1982. "



PeterS wrote:
>>snip<<

Nearly all the decline in the firearm homicide rate took place in the 1990s; the downward trend stopped in 2001 and resumed slowly in 2007. The victimization rate for other gun crimes plunged in the 1990s, then declined more slowly from 2000 to 2008. The rate appears to be higher in 2011 compared with 2008, but the increase is not statistically significant. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall also dropped in the 1990s before declining more slowly from 2000 to 2010, then ticked up in 2011.

The household gun ownership rate has fallen from an average of 50 percent in the 1970s to 49 percent in the 1980s, 43 percent in the 1990s and 35 percent in the 2000s, according to the survey data, analyzed by The New York Times.


>>end<<

Patty, there are a couple problems with the logic you are showing here. 1) Gun sales, according to the FBI, were steady during the 1990's and only showed a marked increase during the 2000's . At the same time, the greatest decline in gun violence was during the 90’s, when gun sales were steady, and gun violence was steady when gun sales showed the greatest increase during the 2000's. Shouldn’t the opposite have happened--gun violence was steady when gun sales were steady and gun violence declined when gun sales increased? And 2) actual household ownership of guns has declined meaning that gun ownership is increasing amongst fewer households. How does fewer (paranoid) gun owners buying more guns make gun violence go down?
>>snip<< br br i Nearly all the decl... (show quote)

Reply
Aug 1, 2014 15:53:08   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Rainrider wrote:
Oh really????? Never would have thought that one up. LOL Ok so I am being what you call it, an a@@. yep that sounds like what I would call it.
In all fairness however, we should also look at what GUN FREE ZONES have cost in both lives and quality of life.
As for lives lost. Well we all know that there has never been a mas-shooting at any of the following. Target range, police convention, gun show, cop shop, or Sharif department. So what do they have in common? Guns? Yep big scarey black ones, little scarey pink ones, and all manner of scary things.
Now the gun free zones, they have nothing scary around, so the bad guy is not scared to go in there. It also leads them to know they can can shoot for some time before someone comes along with a scary thing to scare them to death with.
Has anyone but me noticed that when some place is declared gun free, folks start getting robed there?
Ok sorry I know this post is so full of sarcasm it drips with it. I pray it doesn't get on any one. LOL
Oh really????? Never would have thought that one ... (show quote)



Sarcasm has its value if for no other reason than to express your point without using the kind of language that will get you thrown off the site. That is almost as bad as AuntiE's frying pan!

Reply
Aug 1, 2014 15:56:59   #
Patty
 
No gun crimes were 1.6 million in 93 and .6 million in 2011. Unintention firearms incidents are down 58%. If 43% of US homes say they have firearms in their homes you can probably add another 20% to that since most people will not answer that question and rightfully so since it is no ones business. You should have watched the video before commenting.
PeterS wrote:
>>snip<<

Nearly all the decline in the firearm homicide rate took place in the 1990s; the downward trend stopped in 2001 and resumed slowly in 2007. The victimization rate for other gun crimes plunged in the 1990s, then declined more slowly from 2000 to 2008. The rate appears to be higher in 2011 compared with 2008, but the increase is not statistically significant. Violent non-fatal crime victimization overall also dropped in the 1990s before declining more slowly from 2000 to 2010, then ticked up in 2011.

The household gun ownership rate has fallen from an average of 50 percent in the 1970s to 49 percent in the 1980s, 43 percent in the 1990s and 35 percent in the 2000s, according to the survey data, analyzed by The New York Times.


>>end<<

Patty, there are a couple problems with the logic you are showing here. 1) Gun sales, according to the FBI, were steady during the 1990's and only showed a marked increase during the 2000's . At the same time, the greatest decline in gun violence was during the 90’s, when gun sales were steady, and gun violence was steady when gun sales showed the greatest increase during the 2000's. Shouldn’t the opposite have happened--gun violence was steady when gun sales were steady and gun violence declined when gun sales increased? And 2) actual household ownership of guns has declined meaning that gun ownership is increasing amongst fewer households. How does fewer (paranoid) gun owners buying more guns make gun violence go down?
>>snip<< br br i Nearly all the decl... (show quote)

Reply
 
 
Aug 1, 2014 16:11:19   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
Patty wrote:
No gun crimes were 1.6 million in 93 and .6 million in 2011. Unintention firearms incidents are down 58%. If 43% of US homes say they have firearms in their homes you can probably add another 20% to that since most people will not answer that question and rightfully so since it is no ones business. You should have watched the video before commenting.



Patty,
Notice that Peter S and a number like him assume that most gun owners are paranoid.

Nest time a pack of coyotes is standing in my driveway I think I will call him to come and talk the beasts into going away. How do you think that would work?

Reply
Aug 1, 2014 16:32:54   #
Patty
 
Maybe he can quote numbers from one of his proggy websites and magically turn them into laughing hyienas just rolling on the ground laughing. That might work.
no propaganda please wrote:
Patty,
Notice that Peter S and a number like him assume that most gun owners are paranoid.

Nest time a pack of coyotes is standing in my driveway I think I will call him to come and talk the beasts into going away. How do you think that would work?

Reply
Aug 1, 2014 17:10:45   #
lpnmajor Loc: Arkansas
 
Patty wrote:
Maybe he can quote numbers from one of his proggy websites and magically turn them into laughing hyienas just rolling on the ground laughing. That might work.


Hey, here's another thing criminals forget to factor when planning a crime ( I am assuming a modicum intelligence exists in them :shock: ). How many are unaware of the deadly consequences of attempting to assault military veterans? I've known a few folk who could drop you with a single finger ( I can attest to it's effectiveness personally ) and/or k**l you with a rock thrown from 25 feet.

I have noticed a remarkable lack of crime in areas frequented by Vets and neighborhoods where they live. I remember a VFW in Florida that armed men attempted to rob, one night in 1983. The would be criminals walked into the police station, on their own feet, wearing their under under britches on their heads and one finger stuck up their asses. It seems that, after a short discussion, the criminals found that humiliation easier to live with than the alternative we gave them.

It may be that, any reduction in crime rates ( which I don't see ), could be due to the marked increase in the number of Veterans.

Reply
Aug 1, 2014 17:17:21   #
Patty
 
lpnmajor wrote:
Hey, here's another thing criminals forget to factor when planning a crime ( I am assuming a modicum intelligence exists in them :shock: ). How many are unaware of the deadly consequences of attempting to assault military veterans? I've known a few folk who could drop you with a single finger ( I can attest to it's effectiveness personally ) and/or k**l you with a rock thrown from 25 feet.

I have noticed a remarkable lack of crime in areas frequented by Vets and neighborhoods where they live. I remember a VFW in Florida that armed men attempted to rob, one night in 1983. The would be criminals walked into the police station, on their own feet, wearing their under under britches on their heads and one finger stuck up their asses. It seems that, after a short discussion, the criminals found that humiliation easier to live with than the alternative we gave them.

It may be that, any reduction in crime rates ( which I don't see ), could be due to the marked increase in the number of Veterans.
Hey, here's another thing criminals forget to fact... (show quote)


:thumbup: :thumbup: :thumbup:
Some are just not to bright either,



Reply
 
 
Aug 1, 2014 17:31:10   #
semper-fi Loc: Corrupticut
 
Old_Gringo wrote:
I would perceive, if that is true, the reason the libs would want the practice stopped, would be because the criminals would know who was unarmed and be an easy target. (Sure used "would" a lot didn't I?)


UH OH Long Timer, you know what they say about folks when they start repeating themselves don't you?? :D :)

Reply
Aug 1, 2014 17:38:24   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
semper-fi wrote:
UH OH Long Timer, you know what they say about folks when they start repeating themselves don't you?? :D :)


I do appear to suffer that affliction don't I? :lol:

Reply
Aug 1, 2014 18:25:53   #
Ve'hoe
 
Actually,,, I would rather have the coyotes than peterS

no propaganda please wrote:
Patty,
Notice that Peter S and a number like him assume that most gun owners are paranoid.

Nest time a pack of coyotes is standing in my driveway I think I will call him to come and talk the beasts into going away. How do you think that would work?

Reply
Aug 1, 2014 18:35:27   #
Workinman Loc: Bayou Pigeon
 
Patty wrote:
A Pew Research study has shown what every sensible gun-owner already knows is true.

As gun sales rise, crime levels fall. No matter how hard liberal-minded gun control freaks try to spin the numbers, they just can’t get around the simple t***h that responsible gun-ownership is a huge deterrent to crime.

Unsurprisingly, one of the main reasons for increases in gun crime is the creation of more frivolous gun laws.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=AimbTtuOhY4
A Pew Research study has shown what every sensible... (show quote)




Patty I haven't even looked and I know crime has gone down! Now I will look at the rest. :mrgreen:

Reply
 
 
Aug 1, 2014 19:35:44   #
semper-fi Loc: Corrupticut
 
Old_Gringo wrote:
I do appear to suffer that affliction don't I? :lol:


There's a cure for that you know you know you know. :-) :XD: :mrgreen: :thumbup:

Reply
Aug 1, 2014 20:56:46   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
semper-fi wrote:
There's a cure for that you know you know you know. :-) :XD: :mrgreen: :thumbup:


Si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, si, but what is it it it it it it?

Reply
Aug 1, 2014 23:15:26   #
Rainrider Loc: Lovington NM
 
no propaganda please wrote:
Patty,
Notice that Peter S and a number like him assume that most gun owners are paranoid.

Nest time a pack of coyotes is standing in my driveway I think I will call him to come and talk the beasts into going away. How do you think that would work?


What do I have to be paranoid about if I have a gun?? I mean for real a good 44mag give me a big reason not to be.

Reply
Aug 1, 2014 23:34:33   #
PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.
 
Rainrider wrote:
What do I have to be paranoid about if I have a gun?? I mean for real a good 44mag give me a big reason not to be.


That isn't a gun, that's a flaming cannon. :lol: :lol: :lol:

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 4 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.