One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Did Joe Biden Answer All The Town Hall Questions?
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
Oct 17, 2020 11:10:52   #
moldyoldy
 
TommyRadd wrote:
Thank you for proving my point that all you do is read from the leftist teleprompter/script and don’t apply true critical thinking skills.

Where did I say or imply that a Christian or Deist, having the God-given, Constitutionally protected right to freely and openly practice his or her religion, equates to a “right” or authority” to make you or anyone else “practice” said religion?

Why is it so hard for you to acknowledge: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof
Thank you for proving my point that all you do is ... (show quote)


Claiming repeatedly that this is a Christian country belies the claims of freedom of religion espoused. Keep your religion to yourself.

| Reply
Oct 17, 2020 11:12:26   #
debeda
 
tbutkovich wrote:
He led off so many of his answers by prefacing his response with the words: “It depends!” For example, if asked a question like “Would You Pack The Supreme Court” and he leads the response with, “It depends” This answer is neither a “yes” or a “no!” He does this to escape from the question.

The answer prefaced with “It Depends” is ambiguous and hence must be declared a non-response. He does this because he does not want to alienate his juxtaposed radical or moderate bases. He doesn’t answer in order to avoid political controversy. He is conning the public by pulling a Nancy Pelosi. “You will know where I stand on the issue after I get elected.” What the hell kind of answer is that?

Anyone who falls for this BS is playing “Russian Roulette” with their vote!
He led off so many of his answers by prefacing his... (show quote)


To me that's typical dem double speak. It's like the entire democratic party has become the Chicago/Illinois democratic party. Promise everyone everything, not necessarily specifically but by inference, then do whatever the heck the party want once you're in. It continues to work for them because they are also masters at voter fraud and voter pressure. City and town cops, for instance, have always been required to stump for dems. Firemen, union workers, city workers, etc. Which is why, being born and raised here, I'm so jaded when it comes to democrats.

| Reply
Oct 17, 2020 11:13:37   #
debeda
 
Gatsby wrote:
Biden was reading all of his "canned" responses off the tele-prompter, blame his programmers.

At least Biden can still read, comprehension escaped Biden at "partial birth", only his brain was aborted.


🤯🤯🤯🤯🤯🤣🤣🤣🤣

| Reply
Oct 17, 2020 11:13:54   #
debeda
 
bilordinary wrote:
But he has such a nice smile and calming voice, no reasonable person would be unable to vote for him.


😖😖😖😖😖😖😖😖C'mon, man🙄😖

| Reply
Oct 17, 2020 11:14:54   #
debeda
 
moldyoldy wrote:
It depends on how the gop acts to push this unqualified woman on the court.


What disqualifies her, specifically?

| Reply
Oct 17, 2020 11:16:42   #
debeda
 
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
It seems to me that "Packing the Court" has acquired a somewhat negative connotation and I believe that answering it in the affirmative is seen as cutting your throat. That is why I think Biden doesn't want to say, yes on it. Therefore, I think that an "It depends" answer is equivalent to saying "Yes, I intend to support that." He is trying to avoid anything which he thinks is going to look bad for him, like saying it is not anyone's right to know what he is thinking. It didn't get him many points.
It seems to me that "Packing the Court" ... (show quote)


Very true. Some of the dems best tools are obfuscation, misdirection and being nonspecific. I don't think old Joe has the mental acuity to pull that off anymore.

| Reply
Oct 17, 2020 11:17:20   #
debeda
 
TexaCan wrote:
Thank God for the unreasonable..............and that Basketfull of Deplorables! 👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

May our basket grow in size and number! 😎


AMEN!!!

| Reply
Oct 17, 2020 11:19:33   #
debeda
 
moldyoldy wrote:
She refused to answer most of the questions. One easy yes or no question she could not answer. She has spent most of her time in a class room.


Was it one of those "Do you still beat your children, yes or no" questions?

| Reply
Oct 17, 2020 11:21:15   #
debeda
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Is this person supposed to be able to rule on the constitution or on the Bible? Her stated beliefs make her unable to be an impartial judge.


So it comes down to religion for you? Would a devout person of any faith be disqualified then?

| Reply
Oct 17, 2020 11:23:20   #
debeda
 
TexaCan wrote:
Give one example in her entire career that she has made a ruling based on the Bible instead of the Constitution or the Law! Do you not realize that every judge has personals beliefs, but that does not mean that they will judge on those beliefs. What you have expressed is based only on your opinion, not a fact, unless you can prove it!


Yeah. And PS? The constitution was written based on mostly Christian principles of fairness, respect for personal sovereignty and creating an upright, peaceful society.

| Reply
Oct 17, 2020 11:37:08   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
moldyoldy wrote:
Claiming repeatedly that this is a Christian country belies the claims of freedom of religion espoused. Keep your religion to yourself.


False accusation. Furthermore, now you are, unconstitutionally, imposing your religious convictions on me and my practice (“free exercise”) of my beliefs!

Where did I claim “repeatedly” that “this is a Christian nation”?

In fact, there is no such thing at the present time:

“Jesus answered, "My Kingdom is not of this world. If my Kingdom were of this world, then my servants would fight, that I wouldn't be delivered to the Jews. But now my Kingdom is not from here." John 18:36

| Reply
Oct 17, 2020 11:39:43   #
debeda
 
TommyRadd wrote:
False accusation. Furthermore, now you are, unconstitutionally, imposing your religious convictions on me and my practice (“free exercise”) of my beliefs!

Where did I claim “repeatedly” that “this is a Christian nation”?

In fact, there is no such thing at the present time:

“Jesus answered, "My Kingdom is not of this world. If my Kingdom were of this world, then my servants would fight, that I wouldn't be delivered to the Jews. But now my Kingdom is not from here." John 18:36
False accusation. Furthermore, now you are, uncons... (show quote)


Bravo, well said Tommy👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

| Reply
Oct 17, 2020 12:13:14   #
moldyoldy
 
debeda wrote:
So it comes down to religion for you? Would a devout person of any faith be disqualified then?


It should be about law not faith.

| Reply
Oct 17, 2020 12:14:56   #
moldyoldy
 
TommyRadd wrote:
False accusation. Furthermore, now you are, unconstitutionally, imposing your religious convictions on me and my practice (“free exercise”) of my beliefs!

Where did I claim “repeatedly” that “this is a Christian nation”?

In fact, there is no such thing at the present time:

“Jesus answered, "My Kingdom is not of this world. If my Kingdom were of this world, then my servants would fight, that I wouldn't be delivered to the Jews. But now my Kingdom is not from here." John 18:36
False accusation. Furthermore, now you are, uncons... (show quote)


I am not saying you specifically, but those of your ilk.

| Reply
Oct 17, 2020 12:23:22   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
moldyoldy wrote:
It should be about law not faith.


Science proves that human life begins at conception. Leftists “believe” otherwise, with no evidence to the contrary other than their personal “religious” values.

The Constitution is clear:

“ We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.

That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed...”

To be clear , in their day, the word “men” was understood as both males and mankind in general.

Why does your leftist camp seek the termination of the life of living unborn humans if your overriding moral conviction is “it should be about law and not faith”? What is it other than your “beliefs” that relegates living human beings to nothing but inconvenient tissue mass? And why does your party insist that we who agree with science on the matter must pay for murdering unborn humans with our tax dollars?

You, sir, are the epitome of a hypocrite!

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2020 IDF International Technologies, Inc.