Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
When the Marys arrived at the tomb, what time was it and was the cave open or closed???
Canuckus, I, personally, do not at this particular moment in time, care in the least about either the precise time, or whether the cave was open or closed, however...
The Scripture is the Word of God given by inspiration to men chosen by God, who wrote in human words in history, reflecting their individual personalities. This dual nature of both divine inspiration and human context makes the interpretation both challenging and necessary.
The Holy Spirit guided these inspired authors of His Holy Word to employ linguistical devices appropriate to the historical setting and culture in which they lived.
The Bible as the Word of God has eternal relevance that demands 1) attention and 2) obedience.
When critics of the Bible claim there are contradictions within its pages, they very often fail to define a contradiction, to examine the context and to properly apply the Law of non-contradiction.
In logic, the law of non-contradiction (LNC) (also known as the law of contradiction, principle of non-contradiction (PNC), or the principle of contradiction) states that contradictory propositions cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time, e. g. the two propositions "A is B" and "A is not B" are mutually exclusive. Formally this is expressed as the tautology ¬(p ∧ ¬p).
Because the principle of non-contradiction is a metaphysical law of being, not a principle limited to particular essences (natures), it applies to all possible things, even those transcending physical reality.
According to Aristotle, first philosophy, or metaphysics, deals with ontology and first principles, of which the principle (or law) of non-contradiction is the firmest. Aristotle says that without the principle of non-contradiction we could not know anything that we do know.
A contradiction occurs when two (or more) different statements on a topic cannot both be true at the same time and in the same sense. The statements "I am preparing my homework," and "I am not preparing my homework" cannot both be true at the same time and in the same way. They are mutually exclusive.
However, "Norman saw two people exit the vintage 1972 blue Chevrolet Camaro," and "Bernard saw three people exit the vintage 1972 blue Chevrolet Camaro" are not contradictory: These statements are not mutually exclusive because both statements can be equally true at the same time.
Norman may have been at an angle where he was able to observe only two people, while Bernard was at a different angle enabling him to see three people. Thus, both statements can be true at the same time and in the same sense with neither excluding the other.
Acts 10 and Acts 11 are excellent examples of where the first chapter tells the story for narration purposes and the second is in "orderly sequence."
Do the Gospels disagree on who discovered the empty tomb?
New Testament critics often suggest that the gospels present contradictory narratives regarding Jesus' resurrection. One such rather weak argument involves the detail of who it was that discovered Jesus' empty tomb.
The claim is that each gospel lists a different set of women and that the story, therefore, cannot be trusted. This argument, however, breaks down on the slightest examination. While each of the four gospels includes unique details on the matter, they all are perfectly consistent with one another on who it was who first found the stone rolled away and the body of Jesus missing. The gospels are definitely in agreement on this.
Compare the following verses; the list of names provided in each gospel of which women arrived at the tomb that Sunday morning:
"Now on the first day of the week Mary Magdalene came early to the tomb," (John 20:1).
"Now after the Sabbath, as it began to dawn toward the first day of the week, Mary Magdalene and the other Mary came to look at the grave," (Matthew 28:1).
"When the Sabbath was over, Mary Magdalene, and Mary the mother of James, and Salome, bought spices, so that they might come and anoint Him," (Mark 16:1).
Luke does not list the names at this point in the story. Instead, he just mentions "the women who had come with Him out of Galilee," (Luke 23:49, 55) and states that:
"But on the first day of the week, at early dawn, they came to the tomb bringing the spices which they had prepared," (Luke 24:1).
However, he later clarifies:
"Now they were Mary Magdalene and Joanna and Mary the mother of James; also the other women with them were telling these things to the apostles," (Luke 24:10).
Without any deep meditation at all, it is clear that these are not entirely different lists but rather longer or shorter versions of the same list. One gospel may have more names than another, but they don't have conflicting names. Some critics specifically argue that John implies that Mary Magdalene was alone, but even this isn't actually true! While hers is the only name given, we read in literally the very next verse:
"So she ran and came to Simon Peter and to the other disciple whom Jesus loved, and said to them, 'They have taken away the Lord out of the tomb, and we do not know where they have laid Him,'" (John 20:2).
Mary doesn't say "I" but rather "'we' do not know where they have laid him." She is clearly speaking on behalf of a group. While John does not explicitly mention the other women, he plainly assumes that they were there. Thus, when we compare these lists, a few things become immediately apparent:
1) All four gospels state that women came to Jesus' tomb early in the morning.
2) All four gospels state that Mary Magdalene was among them.
3) Three of the four gospels explicitly mention that another woman named Mary was also there.
4) Three of the four gospels imply or explicitly acknowledge that other women besides the two Marys were
also present.
5) None of the gospels claim or imply that they are offering an exhaustive list.
The gospels are actually in complete harmony on this matter. One author might have known more names than another. One author may have had a specific reason for emphasizing one particular woman over the others. There is no conflict between these verses, they are all communicating the same thing!
Rather than an example of a contradiction, this is a minor example of the gospel's eye witnesses reporting the same event in slightly different words without any disagreement at all.
No mountain, hardly a mole-hill.
Go ye and do likewise. With prayer, study, and reliance upon the Holy Spirit, you are more than competent to resolve your questions in God's Word.