This is sure to frost the right wing cult...
Sep 25, 2020 02:08:27 #
Weasel wrote:
NO problem here. As long as we have 9 justices on the job the day of the P**********l Inauguration.
As for adding more to the bench, If the people want that, I'm sure President Trump will accommodate those wishes.
As for adding more to the bench, If the people want that, I'm sure President Trump will accommodate those wishes.
Sep 25, 2020 02:13:26 #
kemmer wrote:
The Republicans of course will scream bloody murder but with a Democrat in the WH and a Democratic Senate and House, tough s**t.
Ain't gonna happen!!
Sep 25, 2020 02:15:53 #
marinevet73 wrote:
The only problem with having 9 judges on the court at e******n time is that if the new judge has any principles, they would have to recuse themselves from the case, and bingo, your back to 8. Of course, that assumes the new judges has any principles. Compare that to RBG. She had principles.
Why would she have to recuse herself?? RBG had a lot of l*****t, Democratic principals, but not necessarily for the Constitution!
Sep 25, 2020 02:17:10 #
drlarrygino wrote:
RBG had one principle and it was set forward by Hitlery Rotten Clinton when she instructed Billy Boob to nominate the a******n loving RGB with the promise to keep aborting and murdering as many innocent babies as possible. RGB never wavered from that principle and Hitlery was smiling until RGB's death. At least 40 million babies were murdered under RGB's watch.
SO SAD!!!
Sep 25, 2020 02:19:00 #
JFlorio wrote:
You just spout BS. Prove it. All depends on how the question is asked. Also, you fools always talk about science. Well, science has now proven a fetus feels pain and is a life.
The Dem's only spout Science when they agree with it, otherwise they ignore it!!Sep 25, 2020 02:19:41 #
America 1 wrote:
There are many choices to prevent.
They have a choice and if that choice results in pregnancy,
why is it not their responsibility to pay for the a******n?
They have a choice and if that choice results in pregnancy,
why is it not their responsibility to pay for the a******n?
Sep 25, 2020 02:29:47 #
marinevet73 wrote:
So is your only concern for a******n is who pays f... (show quote)
Trying to compare a******n with war or capital punishment is a cop-out!
Trying to justify your opinion with arguments against the E*****rial College which is the LAW OF THE LAND is unconscionable!
Sep 28, 2020 09:37:22 #
Auntie Dee wrote:
Trying to compare a******n with war or capital punishment is a cop-out!
Trying to justify your opinion with arguments against the E*****rial College which is the LAW OF THE LAND is unconscionable!
Trying to justify your opinion with arguments against the E*****rial College which is the LAW OF THE LAND is unconscionable!
IMHO: One can justify ANY opinion. In my various jobs I have had to justify many things both pro and con.
The E*******l College has a very definite reason for being; it prevents the large metropolitan areas, with their super populations of under-educated and "government-dependent-by-choice" masses of legals and/or i******s, from being able to swamp an e******n and put more sparsely populated states and parts of the country at a serious disadvantage. It is an equalizer. Those who wish to eliminate the E*******l College either have a socialist agenda or don't understand the purpose of the E*******l College. The E*******l College is a very important tool to prevent chaos like is going on in places where where B*M is playing their games from spreading their errant i***tology throughout the country. The Deep State progressive democrats use other similar tools for destroying our e******n system as well, like massive untraceable mail in v****g b****ts, no v**er photo IDs, allowing locked up felons and i*****l a***ns to v**e, and the mobs' ideas of "v****g early and often," and I'd rather not be forced to live under their socialist/f*****t rule.
To keep the USA free, we need to quit continually screwing around trying to destroy or rewrite our Constitution, and actually pay attention to it as the "law of the land!" The Constitution is fine just as it is, and the Supreme Court needs to do their job and follow it, not legislate their own agendas from the bench.
We also need to protect our borders, language and culture, because without these things there will be no USA. Would you rather live in a lawless "no mans land" between Canada and Mexico, who will most likely enforce their borders? That's what the Deep State is working toward. Will Canada or Mexico be their next target to conquer, taking the place of the once sovereign USA?
I've yet to hear one of these Deep State operatives state "exactly" what they want, but their actions indicate that they simply want to rule the world under a New World Order and a Potentate of some sort. We fought a war to get out from under a "King" and now the Deep State people want to put us back under a "King," go figure!
And as to worrying about a******n, it will be a moot point under their Agendas 21 and 30 as they depopulate the planet using genocide and mass murder to attain their arbitrary "ideal population" and their two class system of an Elite ruling class and their Working class s***es that they use for their support.
Definitely not my preference! Have a nice day.
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.