marinevet73

The only problem with having 9 judges on the court at e******n time is that if the new judge has any principles, they would have to recuse themselves from the case, and bingo, your back to 8. Of course, that assumes the new judges has any principles. Compare that to RBG. She had principles.

Big Kahuna

KKKemmer is a little _ _ _ _ ( hint -last word in his post).

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

You have no idea what you are talking about as usual.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

What drugs are you on? Wh**ever it is, makes you really dumb.

marinevet73

Vitamin C and Vitamin E. You dumb F.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Try something else. You’re still dumb.

Big Kahuna

RBG had one principle and it was set forward by Hitlery Rotten Clinton when she instructed Billy Boob to nominate the a******n loving RGB with the promise to keep aborting and murdering as many innocent babies as possible. RGB never wavered from that principle and Hitlery was smiling until RGB's death. At least 40 million babies were murdered under RGB's watch.

Big Kahuna

I think Marionette is on crack.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

Pretty unhinged or just plain dumb.

marinevet73

RGB had a principle that women have rights also. That governed he judicial life. She also pled for men who were harmed by laws that were being applied on a sexual basis. She won that one also.

The majority of Americans believe that women have a choice if they want to continue a pregnancy. A******n is a result of that. I petsonally don't like a******n. But that should be the women's choice, not mine or yours.

RBG had principles, whether you like or dislike Roe v Wade. The majority of Americans (over 70%), agree with her.

JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida

You just spout BS. Prove it. All depends on how the question is asked. Also, you fools always talk about science. Well, science has now proven a fetus feels pain and is a life.

America 1 Loc: South Miami

There are many choices to prevent.
They have a choice and if that choice results in pregnancy,
why is it not their responsibility to pay for the a******n?

Abel

Politicians!

marinevet73

So is your only concern for a******n is who pays for it? I have only know two women who have had an a******n and in both instances they paid for their own. In those instances my involvement was helping their boyfriend pay for it. One was a premarital with the boyfriend. The other was caused by a third party and the boyfriend collected some of the funds from the other guy. In both instances, I was helping a friend.

I think in many instances, some women who have repeat a******ns it is because they know they can't afford to take care of the baby. I think when they rely on charity to get an a******n it is probably in the governments financial interests to accommodate the sbortion in the long run.

If a child grows up with only one non involved parent (or even two non involved parents, for that mstter) the government will likely spend more money on the dependent in later years than paying for the cost of an a******n today.

In my mind. It shouldn't be just a cost consideration. Part of it is a question of quality of life issue.

I'm not sure I see it as murder. The philosophical question is when does life begin. I personally think it's at birth. But my mind isn't closed to other arguments, particularly at conception.

The real point in my mind is if it is murder. I don't think it is. But, let's assume that it is. Governments have been k*****g people over the whole millennium. Any person who has ever advocated for going to war is guilty of advocating for murder. That's what war is. On its simplest element.

Likewise, if you advocated for capital punishment, you have advocated for murder. In my mind, if you are anti a******n because it is murder, then if you ever supported a war or capital punishment, your argument is compleyely diluted and meaningless. If you have been anti war each and every time it has come up, snd you have been anti capital punishment from day one, no matter what the person has done, then I have a great respect for your anti a******n position.

Since the majority of Americsns are in favor if allowing Rowe v Wade as the law of the land i find it unconscionable that the two minority elected presidentswill have put 4 conservative justices on the bench, maybe 5. That will be a true injustice. That is the minority controlling the majority. That is not a good thing in the long term for the US.

Those are my thoughts on a******n.

America 1 Loc: South Miami

Repeat a******ns, how about being responsible for your actions.
It's senseless when there are so many options.
Doing the same thing over and over with the same results.