One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Morality? What morality?
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
Mar 26, 2020 17:47:57   #
Lt. Rob Polans ret.
 
whitnebrat wrote:
Ummm ... one of the criteria I posed was that the employer mandated your coming to work. Perhaps I didn't make myself clear ... you are infectious with this v***s for three days before you get physically sick. This leads to mass infection in the workplace. Mass testing is the only effective remedy for this particular disease's elimination.


No, in that case say you're sick.

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 17:48:58   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Voice of Reason wrote:
Let's hope the v**ers do the right thing in September.


Even my stupid brother is v****g this time.

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 17:49:57   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Lt. Rob Polans ret. wrote:
Either way he should the pipe down for awhile.


Fat chance!

Reply
 
 
Mar 26, 2020 18:03:32   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
BigMike wrote:
Even my stupid brother is v****g this time.


Good, that's important. Remember, everybody who dies from c****av***s will be v****g Democrat in September.

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 18:39:31   #
jwrevagent
 
Voice of Reason wrote:
Thanks. Sorry to hear about your condition, hopefully you're controlling it well enough. A few years back I was told I'm pre-diabetic. Scared the crap outta me because I don't have the personality to deal with all that monitoring and worrying. Fortunately it turns out I'm not, the CDC changed the definition to make it look like there's a bigger 'diabetes crisis' than there is.


I know. I asked my endocrinologist why they keep lowering the number at which you are considered to be diabetic. Went from 200 fasting glucose to 100 fasting glucose. I suspect that when everyone is diagnosed with diabetes, and on insulin perhaps they will be happy. But insulin costs have risen exponentially. My daughter in law is insulin dependent and the cost is what keeps that family close to the poverty line. They have insurance from my son's employer, but it pays next to nothing. My doctor claims that the number is lower because they found that people with higher numbers who are not warned have complications later in life and more severe ones than others may have. A spurious argument if I have ever heard one. I am not insulin dependent, controlled with diet and exercise. I think you are right about the diabetes crisis.

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 19:45:54   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
Voice of Reason wrote:
Good, that's important. Remember, everybody who dies from c****av***s will be v****g Democrat in September.


Oops, meant November. Brain fart I guess. Although if I were a liberal it would be the fault of my keyboard, or Trump.

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 19:46:49   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
jwrevagent wrote:
I know. I asked my endocrinologist why they keep lowering the number at which you are considered to be diabetic. Went from 200 fasting glucose to 100 fasting glucose. I suspect that when everyone is diagnosed with diabetes, and on insulin perhaps they will be happy. But insulin costs have risen exponentially. My daughter in law is insulin dependent and the cost is what keeps that family close to the poverty line. They have insurance from my son's employer, but it pays next to nothing. My doctor claims that the number is lower because they found that people with higher numbers who are not warned have complications later in life and more severe ones than others may have. A spurious argument if I have ever heard one. I am not insulin dependent, controlled with diet and exercise. I think you are right about the diabetes crisis.
I know. I asked my endocrinologist why they keep l... (show quote)


Yup. The more crises they can create, the more funding they receive.

Reply
 
 
Mar 26, 2020 19:59:22   #
teabag09
 
Rose42 wrote:
No but there are questions that need to be addressed. This can’t go on indefinitely. At what point
do we pass the point where food shortages and utility disruptions become the norm? Where we have a harder time with the basics - such as sanitation - that we take for granted? Eventually people will start to rebel. Crime has already gone up.

No easy answers but I hope there is someone thinking further down the road.


Rose, you've hit the most important button. If the work force is sitting at home, milk, eggs, bread, meat, pharmaceuticals, TOILET PAPER, electricity and water and everything else we rely on for survival are all gone.

What's the answer? I don't know but I think this has been really over blown. The flu sickens and k**ls many more every year. This stuff isn't affecting younger people but mainly we seniors with other conditions. I believe it's a planned situation. Mike

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 20:18:43   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

Yeah and Jeff scumbag Bezos wants Americans to donate to his employees ?

What the Freak ?


He’s an ass****

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 20:19:22   #
Wonttakeitanymore
 
Kevyn wrote:
Businesses do not want to help their employees, the only reason they have employees is to make them money. If they could do so with no employees you can bet they would.


And no one would be employed ace!

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 20:41:55   #
tbutkovich
 
whitnebrat wrote:
Scenario:
Office - 100 people. Employer mandates in-house work. One employee comes to work with C****av***s. Infects 10 others. Those 10 infect ten others each within a week. Entire office is now sick and unable to work. Does this make sense?


Her, I am in Scottsdale Arizona. All schools are closed. All restaurants and businesses are closed. Costco, Safeway, Walmart are open. Everyone including myself go to the store to shop and we wash our hands, wear gloves, use yellow dial soap to clean our hands, maintain social distance, don’t touch our faces. Have not contracted c****a v***s. If I went to work, I would follow the same practice, if I feel ill, I will stay home. If the c****a v***s symptoms occur, I seek medical attention. If I test negative. I demand my doctor give me the malaria drug combination.

Except for perhaps the major cities, it seems like many other regions could go back to work and businesses could re-open. I think the current exercise of teaching people to shelter in place, stay clean, avoid socializing has got every one’s attention and they are putting it into practice.

We can do measured things to restart our economy. To shelter people for an extremely long duration will be devastating to the financial well being of this country.

Reply
 
 
Mar 26, 2020 21:39:19   #
Navigator
 
Kevyn wrote:
Businesses do not want to help their employees, the only reason they have employees is to make them money. If they could do so with no employees you can bet they would.


Employers not only want to help their employees, they MUST help their employees and the more help they give them, the more the employees can help the employer make money, the ONLY reason the employer has employees. Where have you been all your life. When you hire someone to mow your lawn do you hire that person for the purpose of giving them $30 or do you give the person $30 to mow your lawn b/c you want your lawn mowed.

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 23:00:17   #
elledee
 
BigMike wrote:
Anyone who wanted to make money and not be DEPENDENT would do the same.

You're saying there's something wrong with expecting an EMPLOYEE to make money for his EMPLOYER?


your responding as if kevie has a clue to what he's talking...hang in there

Reply
Mar 26, 2020 23:13:11   #
Navigator
 
elledee wrote:
your responding as if kevie has a clue to what he's talking...hang in there


I do not enjoy banging my head against a wall but I can't seem to refrain from responding to some of the absolute idiocy so regularly displayed on OPP.

Reply
Mar 27, 2020 05:14:46   #
tbutkovich
 
I***ts “believe they have a right to be provided other people’s money” irregardless of the situation. They do not have to earn it. They would like to sit in a corner smoking weed, while everyone else works.

They would like to appoint someone like the government collect via taxes all the money, and place it on the “table of plenty” The government would like to collect the money so they can siphon off some of that money for their own self interests.

The government would then have all those freeloaders and working people assemble at the “table of plenty.” They would all sing a couple of verses of Koom By Yah! at the start of the ceremony. Those who sat idly by the whole year would take their unearned share, go down to the corner store, buy some more weed and repeat the sequence once again.

They call it in Bernies words:

“Democratic Socialism!” which is widely supported by the many freeloaders in this country including Bernie who never really had a real job having spending most of his life as a career politician.

If you can get enough elected Democrats in office and those that support Democratic Socialism, this policy could become practice. More and more free stuff could be passed out at the table of plenty.

After a few years, those working would get tired of sharing their hard earned dollars, but the policy would still be in force. Their only choice would be to quit working and join the other freeloaders and smoke weed. Soon the table of plenty would become the table of nothing. Everyone coming to the table would receive their fair share of nothing because nothing multiplied by any number is still nothing. No longer would the song Koom-By-Yah fill the chambers.

Yes, under “Democratic Socialism,” eventually you will run out of other people’s money!

Another failed policy being promoted by the I***tic Democrat Party.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.