One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Morality? What morality?
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 next>>
Mar 25, 2020 22:45:38   #
whitnebrat Loc: Blue dot in a sea of red
 
I post this without comment ...
https://www.huffpost.com/entry/billionaires-workers-coronavirus_n_5e7b92f0c5b62a1870d68b11

| Reply
Mar 25, 2020 23:10:05   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 


I'm not a billionaire.

I want people back at work even if it kills them...

...it won't though. Not any more people than usually die.

| Reply
Mar 25, 2020 23:15:18   #
tbutkovich
 
That’s a classic example of a left wing article that ignores the real truth. Our president and businesses do not want to kill people, they want to help their employees.

Shall we have everyone stay sequestered until every single one of our 360 million people are tested? How long shall we let the economy be on hold? Why not keep it shut down til all the flu in the nation has been cured as well? You can’t have it both ways.

We also we have a cure for the virus but not a vaccine. This means we can treat those that get the virus if someone gets it in the workplace. This isn’t business trying to kill its employees. Why not tell the employees if they feel uncomfortable going back to work, stay home!

Amazing how the left, who deliberately kills the unborn has a concern for workers whose chance of getting the virus is small and if they were to get it can still receive an available treatment.

Huffington Post writer doesn’t realize that the economy must restart soon in spite of the risk.

They print these stupid articles like a spider spins a web so when one person dies in the workplace, they can beat on their chest and say: “I told you so!”

| Reply
Mar 25, 2020 23:15:56   #
Sicilianthing
 


>>>

Yeah and Jeff scumbag Bezos wants Americans to donate to his employees ?

What the Freak ?

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 00:53:20   #
Kevyn
 
tbutkovich wrote:
That’s a classic example of a left wing article that ignores the real truth. Our president and businesses do not want to kill people, they want to help their employees.

Shall we have everyone stay sequestered until every single one of our 360 million people are tested? How long shall we let the economy be on hold? Why not keep it shut down til all the flu in the nation has been cured as well? You can’t have it both ways.

We also we have a cure for the virus but not a vaccine. This means we can treat those that get the virus if someone gets it in the workplace. This isn’t business trying to kill its employees. Why not tell the employees if they feel uncomfortable going back to work, stay home!

Amazing how the left, who deliberately kills the unborn has a concern for workers whose chance of getting the virus is small and if they were to get it can still receive an available treatment.

Huffington Post writer doesn’t realize that the economy must restart soon in spite of the risk.

They print these stupid articles like a spider spins a web so when one person dies in the workplace, they can beat on their chest and say: “I told you so!”
That’s a classic example of a left wing article th... (show quote)

Businesses do not want to help their employees, the only reason they have employees is to make them money. If they could do so with no employees you can bet they would.

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 02:34:20   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Kevyn wrote:
Businesses do not want to help their employees, the only reason they have employees is to make them money. If they could do so with no employees you can bet they would.


You aren't thinking...you're parroting. Quit it.

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 02:39:37   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Kevyn wrote:
Businesses do not want to help their employees,


Assinine, fkd-up, bllsht assumption...no...presumption!

Quote:
the only reason they have employees is to make them money.


WHY ELSE would anyone have employees?

Quote:
If they could do so with no employees you can bet they would.


Anyone who wanted to make money and not be DEPENDENT would do the same.

You're saying there's something wrong with expecting an EMPLOYEE to make money for his EMPLOYER?

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 05:58:24   #
American Vet
 
Kevyn wrote:
Businesses do not want to help their employees, the only reason they have employees is to make them money. If they could do so with no employees you can bet they would.


You really should not put your ignorance on display like this, Kevyboy. Does someone need to explain that to you?

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 11:24:05   #
whitnebrat Loc: Blue dot in a sea of red
 
Scenario:
Office - 100 people. Employer mandates in-house work. One employee comes to work with Coronavirus. Infects 10 others. Those 10 infect ten others each within a week. Entire office is now sick and unable to work. Does this make sense?

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 11:43:42   #
tbutkovich
 
Whitnebrat:

Employee should not report to work if they have symptoms. All employees must wash hands. All employees must maintain six foot distance. You can work if you are careful. Is your solution to wait until everyone has been tested in every job before they go back to work? You seem to think you have a math formula that can be applied to all working environments. Can you explain how you arrived at your formula?

Sounds like you are one of those that does not want to return to work.

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 11:59:38   #
Rose42
 
whitnebrat wrote:
Scenario:
Office - 100 people. Employer mandates in-house work. One employee comes to work with Coronavirus. Infects 10 others. Those 10 infect ten others each within a week. Entire office is now sick and unable to work. Does this make sense?


No but there are questions that need to be addressed. This can’t go on indefinitely. At what point
do we pass the point where food shortages and utility disruptions become the norm? Where we have a harder time with the basics - such as sanitation - that we take for granted? Eventually people will start to rebel. Crime has already gone up.

No easy answers but I hope there is someone thinking further down the road.

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 12:20:05   #
whitnebrat Loc: Blue dot in a sea of red
 
tbutkovich wrote:
Whitnebrat:

Employee should not report to work if they have symptoms. All employees must wash hands. All employees must maintain six foot distance. You can work if you are careful. Is your solution to wait until everyone has been tested in every job before they go back to work? You seem to think you have a math formula that can be applied to all working environments. Can you explain how you arrived at your formula?

Sounds like you are one of those that does not want to return to work.
Whitnebrat: br br Employee should not report to w... (show quote)


Ummm ... one of the criteria I posed was that the employer mandated your coming to work. Perhaps I didn't make myself clear ... you are infectious with this virus for three days before you get physically sick. This leads to mass infection in the workplace. Mass testing is the only effective remedy for this particular disease's elimination.

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 13:46:45   #
tbutkovich
 
whitnebrat wrote:
Ummm ... one of the criteria I posed was that the employer mandated your coming to work. Perhaps I didn't make myself clear ... you are infectious with this virus for three days before you get physically sick. This leads to mass infection in the workplace. Mass testing is the only effective remedy for this particular disease's elimination.


When your sick you stay home. Just ignore the employer’s mandate. If he were to fire you for failure to report, hit the employer with a hefty lawsuit.

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 13:46:59   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
whitnebrat wrote:
Ummm ... one of the criteria I posed was that the employer mandated your coming to work. Perhaps I didn't make myself clear ... you are infectious with this virus for three days before you get physically sick. This leads to mass infection in the workplace. Mass testing is the only effective remedy for this particular disease's elimination.


Instead of simply parroting whatever some leftwing rag like Huffpo writers think, you should try exercising some critical thinking of your own.

What does testing show? Lets say you get tested and the results are negative. What does that mean? It means you didn't have the virus WHEN THE SWAB WAS TAKEN. That's all it means. What doesn't it mean? It doesn't mean you don't have the virus NOW.

Testing, for those without symptoms, is meaningless unless they develop a test which gives instant results and can be taken hourly. Which would mean producing and distributing these miraculous tests by the billions. For free.

| Reply
Mar 26, 2020 13:55:13   #
Voice of Reason Loc: Earth
 
tbutkovich wrote:
When your sick you stay home. Just ignore the employer’s mandate. If he were to fire you for failure to report, hit the employer with a hefty lawsuit.


No, you must follow the leftist criteria that states employers hate their employees and want them all dead. Why? Because that's what leftists believe. Just as they believe corporations want to kill all their customers, because that creates profit, somehow.

| Reply
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2020 IDF International Technologies, Inc.