Since trump just sided with Hong Kong and pissed China off, the chance of a new trade deal may have just vanished like the t***h when trump or his con supporters try to spin a lie.

That said, if trump is telling the t***h that China's economy is much worse than the U.S economy, and that China is paying billions and billions and billions of dollars into the treasury, the question becomes why should trump ever end his tariffs on China, in fact why not increase both the rate of tariffs and expand the number of products affected by the trump tariffs.

In a few years or less, trump could bankrupt China, and lower taxes here even further. And pay down the ever increasing trump monthly deficit and ever increasing national debt.

Sounds like a plan that all trump cons should be able to support, so why won't trump do it?

I just went on Netflix this morning. The first thing that popped up was "The Irishman." I watched about 30 minutes of this DiNiro POS, and came to a realization. Robert and his liberal ilk celebrate that which is the worst in humanity. He and the rest of of his philosophical compadres h**e Trump because he stands for trade between willing individuals, not thugs like trade unions and government. I truly think the liberal commentators on this site are thugs and thieves. Celebrating the likes of thieves like Warren and Bernie and the people DeNiro portrays is unconscionable. The same people the liberals on this site glorify, I disdain. Trump is the first president in a century to actually believe in America as a philosophy. And yes, I think Reagan paid lip service and caved. Is Trump perfect? Uh, no. But he's by far the best in my 45 years of v****g.

Hey, hockey pick, I ain't crying. You like to mix it up? So be it. It takes complete i***t to deny the good Trump had done. Only a stupid fool would fuss about more of all minorities working than ever before. Does your incopintant brain want them back on food stamps? Or are you just lying about those poor i*****l i*******ts? You want them over here but not to have a job? How ridiculous can you be? You know what? Trump ain't the first president to use tarriffs...he didn't invent them.
People only bought Chinese stuff because it was cheap. No matter who pays the tarriffs, it will hit the Chinese,..
People will stop buying the over priced crap that China puts out. China will be the one to get hurt. Are Americans gonna die cause they can't buy a cheap ass toy from China.Your news sources are liars, your dimwitocrats are liars, and i***tic supporters who don't even know what they support are happy to lie too. You people are pissed because Trump sided with Hong Kong instead of a c*******t regime. That's totally a reversal from your tantrums about the Kurds. So do you support people trying to be free or not. If you can't make up your mind, you need to STFU, so intelligent people can actually debate on OPP. I have theroized that liberals don't pick their noses because if they did, they would lose what little brain they have.

I said, " I have found that when people do what Obama does they are usually deliberately confusing their marks before they screw them over. "

You said
" In MY long life I have found that to be the exception rather than the rule. Maybe I'm just less prone to being fooled because when people try to fool me with big words I can usually see right through it. "

I had some more clever remarks in mind, but I will just leave it there.

I said, " I have studied Samuel Johnson the great 18th English century literary figure and sometimes he would use obscure language, but you could still grasp his meaning because he valued clarity above all else. "
You said,

" My bet is that you were simply more interested in what Samuel Johnson was saying so you took the effort to learn what he meant. " Of course that is true. Johnson, not being a politician had no reason to attempt deception. Obama being a politician was more interested in winning than he was in the t***h.

I said,
" Obama deliberately uses imprecise language so that when his ideas fail he could always claim that he did not mean what you thought he said. Used car salesmen and crooked politicians do that. "

You said,
" I'm not going to say this technique isn't used in politics but I don't think it's an accurate caricature of Obama's communication to the public. I think in most cases he was just talking to the American people on an adult level. "

You've already admitted that you did not understand everything he said. I say that he looked into the TV cameras and deliberately lied about Obamacare. Now you may be higher educated than the average v**er and you did not get 100 % of what he said. Imagine how much less many other citizens understood when he spoke. Add that to the fact that I say he lied, and the inescapable conclusion is that Obama lied his ass off and used big words and twisted logic to deceive everyone, but me.

He wasn't able to deceive me. I knew the Obamacare numbers did not and could not add up. It did not matter because v**ers like you had already given him the power to enact Obamacare.