When Your Party Gets Busted Lying...Do You Even Care? (Page 8): :sm24: :sm24: :sm24: :sm24:...

4430 Loc: Little Egypt ** Southern Illinory

Seth wrote:

If this was indeed the case, the Democrats wouldn'... (show quote)

eden

See my responses in brackets.

Seth wrote:

If this was indeed the case, the Democrats wouldn't have been expending their every waking moment trying to find something, anything they could use to impeach Trump. The only thing they haven't done yet is pull on a rubber glove and stick a finger up his rectum.

(No he hires porn stars for those kind of shenanigans)

Now they've settled on a really shoddy attempt at impeachment that's going to backfire big time.

(“Shoddy”? Hmmmm seems legal if a little gleeful. Must have hit a nerve looking at Trumps shrill angry defensiveness. Keynote here: if you are not guilty...for GODS sake STOP acting guilty. Palling around with suspicious looking Russian “businessmen” and shady inept lawyers like Giuliani is also not helpful)

I'm sure you only read "progressive" news and "information" sites or newspapers and probably watch anti-Trump "news" networks, and those don't give both sides of the story; if you did, you'd read about (or "watch" about) all the evidence and all the revelations coming to light that are going to not only absolve Trump of the baseless accusations the Democrats are offering up, but also destroy weaselly Adam Schitt's political career and likely force Pelosi either out of her leadership slot or into retirement.

(I have a cable bundle that excludes Fox, MSNBC CNN and any other for-profit opinion shows masquerading as “news”. PBS and NPR have food for the healthy brain but their news segments are probably too dry to generate a political pulse although I suspect many of their commentators trend left. The Economist magazine, a dry somewhat conservative and terribly British publication nonetheless puts out good analytical articles about American politics although scanning them for partisan fervor will put you to sleep. If Trump only read The Wall Street Journal, a decidedly conservative publication, he would cringe at their editorials excoriating his Presidency but
luckily he doesn’t read (phew!).
The contrast between Adam Schiff and Trump is stark to say the least. A former Federal Prosecutor Schiff is calm, measured and factual and if he gives an opinion he labels it as such. He, along with Pelosi counseled patience amidst the chorus of cries for impeachment from the hostile left of his party, favoring to proceed only when the witnesses coming forward made it obvious that something had to be done.
His estimated net worth is less than mine,
and lastly he is a Vegan, another contrast to the cowburger gulping Trump.😁
It is easy to discern who Trump fears the most by the level of vicious name calling and angry tirades throwing big words he does not understand like “treason”.
As I have previously stated, I am not a Democrat. There are people in both parties that I respect for their principles and fortitude and on the left one of those is Adam Schiff. I hope he doesn’t disappoint me.)

Watch and see...

If this was indeed the case, the Democrats wouldn'... (show quote)

eden

See my responses in brackets.[/quote]

Seth wrote:
If this was indeed the case, the Democrats wouldn't have been expending their every waking moment trying to find something, anything they could use to impeach Trump. The only thing they haven't done yet is pull on a rubber glove and stick a finger up his rectum.

(No he hires porn stars for those kind of shenanigans)

Now they've settled on a really shoddy attempt at impeachment that's going to backfire big time.

(“Shoddy”? Hmmmm seems legal if a little gleeful. Must have hit a nerve looking at Trumps shrill angry defensiveness. Keynote here: if you are not guilty...for GODS sake STOP acting guilty. Palling around with suspicious looking Russian “businessmen” and shady inept lawyers like Giuliani is also not helpful)

I'm sure you only read "progressive" news and "information" sites or newspapers and probably watch anti-Trump "news" networks, and those don't give both sides of the story; if you did, you'd read about (or "watch" about) all the evidence and all the revelations coming to light that are going to not only absolve Trump of the baseless accusations the Democrats are offering up, but also destroy weaselly Adam Schitt's political career and likely force Pelosi either out of her leadership slot or into retirement.

(I have a cable bundle that excludes Fox, MSNBC CNN and any other for-profit opinion shows masquerading as “news”. PBS and NPR have food for the healthy brain but their news segments are probably too dry to generate a political pulse although I suspect many of their commentators trend left. The Economist magazine, a dry somewhat conservative and terribly British publication nonetheless puts out good analytical articles about American politics although scanning them for partisan fervor will put you to sleep. If Trump only read The Wall Street Journal, a decidedly conservative publication, he would cringe at their editorials excoriating his Presidency but
luckily he doesn’t read (phew!).
The contrast between Adam Schiff and Trump is stark to say the least. A former Federal Prosecutor Schiff is calm, measured and factual and if he gives an opinion he generally labels it as such. He, along with Pelosi counseled patience amidst the chorus of cries for impeachment from the hostile left of his party, favoring to proceed only when the witnesses coming forward made it obvious that something had to be done.
His estimated net worth is less than mine,
and lastly he is a Vegan, another contrast to the cowburger gulping Trump.😁
It is easy to discern who Trump fears the most by the level of vicious name calling and angry tirades throwing big words he does not understand like “treason”.
As I have previously stated, I am not a Democrat. There are people in both parties that I respect for their principles and fortitude and on the left one of those is Adam Schiff. I hope he doesn’t disappoint me.)

Watch and see...
eden

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

eden wrote:

Funny how this talking point about failing to acce... (show quote)

Which adversaries have benefited?

eden

BigMike wrote:

You like to think of yourself as superior. How silly.

You give away your feeling of inferior.
How silly. 😊

eden

nwtk2007 wrote:

Which adversaries have benefited?

Russia, China, North Korea, Iran.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

eden wrote:

You give away your feeling of inferior.
How silly. 😊

You're riposte is late...I can tell you this though, I never had to attack Obama on a personal level because that stuff doesn't matter.

He was a g*******t. That's what I oppose...and I won't get lost in insignificant details

Go ahead and continue underestimating us. Think you're way smart...think your guys are way smart and we're waaaay dumb in comparison.

So far not one trick you've used has worked. Here's some news.

Motion to Compel...Flynn was bait!

"I caught them all." DT...

Better do pushups before the next 2 IG Reports...360 days until e******n day...

Optics are everything...timing is everything.

BigMike Loc: yerington nv

eden wrote:

See my responses in brackets.

Seth wrote:
If this was indeed the case, the Democrats wouldn't have been expending their every waking moment trying to find something, anything they could use to impeach Trump. The only thing they haven't done yet is pull on a rubber glove and stick a finger up his rectum.

(No he hires porn stars for those kind of shenanigans)

Now they've settled on a really shoddy attempt at impeachment that's going to backfire big time.

(“Shoddy”? Hmmmm seems legal if a little gleeful. Must have hit a nerve looking at Trumps shrill angry defensiveness. Keynote here: if you are not guilty...for GODS sake STOP acting guilty. Palling around with suspicious looking Russian “businessmen” and shady inept lawyers like Giuliani is also not helpful)

I'm sure you only read "progressive" news and "information" sites or newspapers and probably watch anti-Trump "news" networks, and those don't give both sides of the story; if you did, you'd read about (or "watch" about) all the evidence and all the revelations coming to light that are going to not only absolve Trump of the baseless accusations the Democrats are offering up, but also destroy weaselly Adam Schitt's political career and likely force Pelosi either out of her leadership slot or into retirement.

(I have a cable bundle that excludes Fox, MSNBC CNN and any other for-profit opinion shows masquerading as “news”. PBS and NPR have food for the healthy brain but their news segments are probably too dry to generate a political pulse although I suspect many of their commentators trend left. The Economist magazine, a dry somewhat conservative and terribly British publication nonetheless puts out good analytical articles about American politics although scanning them for partisan fervor will put you to sleep. If Trump only read The Wall Street Journal, a decidedly conservative publication, he would cringe at their editorials excoriating his Presidency but
luckily he doesn’t read (phew!).
The contrast between Adam Schiff and Trump is stark to say the least. A former Federal Prosecutor Schiff is calm, measured and factual and if he gives an opinion he generally labels it as such. He, along with Pelosi counseled patience amidst the chorus of cries for impeachment from the hostile left of his party, favoring to proceed only when the witnesses coming forward made it obvious that something had to be done.
His estimated net worth is less than mine,
and lastly he is a Vegan, another contrast to the cowburger gulping Trump.😁
It is easy to discern who Trump fears the most by the level of vicious name calling and angry tirades throwing big words he does not understand like “treason”.
As I have previously stated, I am not a Democrat. There are people in both parties that I respect for their principles and fortitude and on the left one of those is Adam Schiff. I hope he doesn’t disappoint me.)

Watch and see...
eden

See my responses in brackets. br br Seth wrote: b... (show quote)

Declass will blow the cover of half of Washington. Those like Ryan who were smart and got out get a reprieve. You'll lose the House. Ginsberg will croak. Repubs keep the Senate. Trump is reelected. End of the 2nd part of the Trilogy. Part 3 begins with 2020.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

eden wrote:

Russia, China, North Korea, Iran.

How so?

eden

BigMike wrote:

You're riposte is late...I can tell you this thoug... (show quote)

Omg now you are being defensive . Don’t make it worse...ok?

Seth

BigMike wrote:

It's a good way to prioritize prosecutions if limited court availability is a problem.

Which is why we won't hear a peep out of them.

Fig. A: A peep 🐣-- "Peep!"

Seth

eden wrote:

See my responses in brackets.

Seth wrote:
If this was indeed the case, the Democrats wouldn't have been expending their every waking moment trying to find something, anything they could use to impeach Trump. The only thing they haven't done yet is pull on a rubber glove and stick a finger up his rectum.

(No he hires porn stars for those kind of shenanigans)

Now they've settled on a really shoddy attempt at impeachment that's going to backfire big time.

(“Shoddy”? Hmmmm seems legal if a little gleeful. Must have hit a nerve looking at Trumps shrill angry defensiveness. Keynote here: if you are not guilty...for GODS sake STOP acting guilty. Palling around with suspicious looking Russian “businessmen” and shady inept lawyers like Giuliani is also not helpful)

I'm sure you only read "progressive" news and "information" sites or newspapers and probably watch anti-Trump "news" networks, and those don't give both sides of the story; if you did, you'd read about (or "watch" about) all the evidence and all the revelations coming to light that are going to not only absolve Trump of the baseless accusations the Democrats are offering up, but also destroy weaselly Adam Schitt's political career and likely force Pelosi either out of her leadership slot or into retirement.

(I have a cable bundle that excludes Fox, MSNBC CNN and any other for-profit opinion shows masquerading as “news”. PBS and NPR have food for the healthy brain but their news segments are probably too dry to generate a political pulse although I suspect many of their commentators trend left. The Economist magazine, a dry somewhat conservative and terribly British publication nonetheless puts out good analytical articles about American politics although scanning them for partisan fervor will put you to sleep. If Trump only read The Wall Street Journal, a decidedly conservative publication, he would cringe at their editorials excoriating his Presidency but
luckily he doesn’t read (phew!).
The contrast between Adam Schiff and Trump is stark to say the least. A former Federal Prosecutor Schiff is calm, measured and factual and if he gives an opinion he generally labels it as such. He, along with Pelosi counseled patience amidst the chorus of cries for impeachment from the hostile left of his party, favoring to proceed only when the witnesses coming forward made it obvious that something had to be done.
His estimated net worth is less than mine,
and lastly he is a Vegan, another contrast to the cowburger gulping Trump.😁
It is easy to discern who Trump fears the most by the level of vicious name calling and angry tirades throwing big words he does not understand like “treason”.
As I have previously stated, I am not a Democrat. There are people in both parties that I respect for their principles and fortitude and on the left one of those is Adam Schiff. I hope he doesn’t disappoint me.)

Watch and see...
eden

See my responses in brackets. br br Seth wrote: b... (show quote)

Wow, you are like anti-matter to matter, your character judgement is as convoluted as AOC's thought process.

But yes, watch and see.

eden

Seth wrote:

Wow, you are like anti-matter to matter, your character judgement is as convoluted as AOC's thought process.

But yes, watch and see.

Notably you do not refute any of my points but maybe it’s just time for lunch. 😊

Seth

eden wrote:

Notably you do not refute any of my points but maybe it’s just time for lunch. 😊

Your points are all backwards logic or reverse t***h, which is why I referred to them as anti-matter. My refutations would simply be the opposites, so why waste words?

eden

Seth wrote:

Your points are all backwards logic or reverse t***h, which is why I referred to them as anti-matter. My refutations would simply be the opposites, so why waste words?

Why indeed.