One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Fact-checking 5 claims about the impeachment inquiry
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
Oct 13, 2019 13:48:37   #
JoyV
 
PeterS wrote:
(1) When you are 30 points up (when Trump asked Zelensky a favor), the only place you can go is down. Currently, Biden and Warren are tied for the lead. Since you apparently have a crystal ball, why don't you tell the president who is going to be the nominee?

(2) Snip>>> "Rudy very much knows what's happening and he's a very capable guy. If you would speak to him, that would be great (here Trump is asking president Z to speak to Rudy Giuliani who has taken the lead in investigating Biden and his son). The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing, there is a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so wh**ever you can do with the attorney general would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it...it sounds horrible to me. (here Trump directly asks President Z to look into Joe Biden)

Brackets are my comments. In statement one Trump asks Z to work with Rudy Giuliani, who is Trump's lead investigator on Biden and in statement two, Trump asks Z directly to look into Joe Biden. As I told CD, I can't make you comprehend this--but there is no more direct way to ask someone to investigate someone, who at the time was 30 points up and leading the Democratic field.

The rest of your statements about the house are nonsense, and in general, are relevant to conservatives but conservatives only make up about 35% of the country, not the majority. As hard as it is for you to comprehend there are far more Americans in this country than just you...

I can assure you that my impeachment tolerance is nowhere near exhaustion and won't be until he is packed up and leaving via the nearest uber.
(1) When you are 30 points up (when Trump asked Ze... (show quote)

Rudy Giuliani was once a very capable guy. But ever since Trump was elected, he has made statements of what Trump really means often opposite of Trump's own words. He has undermined Trump on numerous occasions whether intentionally or not.

Reply
Oct 13, 2019 13:56:17   #
JoyV
 
PeterS wrote:
(1) When you are 30 points up (when Trump asked Zelensky a favor), the only place you can go is down. Currently, Biden and Warren are tied for the lead. Since you apparently have a crystal ball, why don't you tell the president who is going to be the nominee?

(2) Snip>>> "Rudy very much knows what's happening and he's a very capable guy. If you would speak to him, that would be great (here Trump is asking president Z to speak to Rudy Giuliani who has taken the lead in investigating Biden and his son). The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing, there is a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so wh**ever you can do with the attorney general would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it...it sounds horrible to me. (here Trump directly asks President Z to look into Joe Biden)

Brackets are my comments. In statement one Trump asks Z to work with Rudy Giuliani, who is Trump's lead investigator on Biden and in statement two, Trump asks Z directly to look into Joe Biden. As I told CD, I can't make you comprehend this--but there is no more direct way to ask someone to investigate someone, who at the time was 30 points up and leading the Democratic field.

The rest of your statements about the house are nonsense, and in general, are relevant to conservatives but conservatives only make up about 35% of the country, not the majority. As hard as it is for you to comprehend there are far more Americans in this country than just you...

I can assure you that my impeachment tolerance is nowhere near exhaustion and won't be until he is packed up and leaving via the nearest uber.
(1) When you are 30 points up (when Trump asked Ze... (show quote)


Trump specifically referred to the Ukrainian corruption investigation in the phone call, which you conveniently left out of your quote. This investigation was not specifically about H****r. It was a corruption investigation involving many Ukrainian companies including the one H****r was on the board of.

Secondly, Rudy was investigating Biden's involvement relating to his public brag about threatening a foreign government BEFORE Biden entered the p**********l race. The investigation was not instituted to bring down a campaign rival as Biden was not yet running.

Reply
Oct 13, 2019 14:06:01   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Kevyn wrote:
Where do you get the idea that congress can not issue subpoenas in the process of investigation, they can. And “impeachment exhaustion” give us a break, what the country is experiencing is exhaustion with the Cheeto faced S**tgibbon’s criminal buffoonery.


Because it's an inquiry, not an investigation. They can issue strongly worded letters with implied threats of future action like sending an account to a collection agency but they do not have subpoena power.

Reply
 
 
Oct 13, 2019 14:09:05   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Good information...

I found the fourth somewhat presumptuous on Chairwoman Pelosi's part...


It truly is presumptuous. She also knows it. And, since Trump started looking into that Biden/Ukraine corruption long before Biden announced, it is a reach to imply some sort of quid pro quo existed as relates to Biden the candidate. If there was actually any implied secretive quid pro quo it was to get Ukraine to look into corruption; investigate it and prosecute it. Biden could have even sniffed that out and decided to run as a shield defense.

Reply
Oct 13, 2019 14:10:49   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
PeterS wrote:
"We don't ask foreign governments for help in our e******ns" And what is presumptuous about that?


The presumption is to imply that is what Trump was trying to get. Had she known about Giuliani and Trump looking into the Biden affair as early as they had been, even Nancy might have refrained from that claim.

Reply
Oct 13, 2019 14:13:19   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
PeterS wrote:
(1) When you are 30 points up (when Trump asked Zelensky a favor), the only place you can go is down. Currently, Biden and Warren are tied for the lead. Since you apparently have a crystal ball, why don't you tell the president who is going to be the nominee?

(2) Snip>>> "Rudy very much knows what's happening and he's a very capable guy. If you would speak to him, that would be great (here Trump is asking president Z to speak to Rudy Giuliani who has taken the lead in investigating Biden and his son). The former ambassador from the United States, the woman, was bad news so I just want to let you know that. The other thing, there is a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so wh**ever you can do with the attorney general would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it...it sounds horrible to me. (here Trump directly asks President Z to look into Joe Biden)

Brackets are my comments. In statement one Trump asks Z to work with Rudy Giuliani, who is Trump's lead investigator on Biden and in statement two, Trump asks Z directly to look into Joe Biden. As I told CD, I can't make you comprehend this--but there is no more direct way to ask someone to investigate someone, who at the time was 30 points up and leading the Democratic field.

The rest of your statements about the house are nonsense, and in general, are relevant to conservatives but conservatives only make up about 35% of the country, not the majority. As hard as it is for you to comprehend there are far more Americans in this country than just you...

I can assure you that my impeachment tolerance is nowhere near exhaustion and won't be until he is packed up and leaving via the nearest uber.
(1) When you are 30 points up (when Trump asked Ze... (show quote)


Tell us peter, why do you Trump h**ers avoid the FACT that Trump's favor was distinctly to look into Crowdstrike?? Do you think there is some sort of code Trump was using that means something mentioned later in the conversation was actually the thing the favor was all about?? Right! LOLOL!!!!!!!

Reply
Oct 13, 2019 14:14:47   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Plenty of more direct ways...

One could outright pay for a dossier on one's political opponents


Yep, and then use it in its never verified form to convince FISA judges to issue warrants to spy on e******n opposition and later a sitting president!

Reply
 
 
Oct 13, 2019 14:15:35   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
JoyV wrote:
Rudy Giuliani was once a very capable guy. But ever since Trump was elected, he has made statements of what Trump really means often opposite of Trump's own words. He has undermined Trump on numerous occasions whether intentionally or not.


Only in the minds of the Trump h**ers.

Reply
Oct 13, 2019 14:16:45   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
JoyV wrote:
Trump specifically referred to the Ukrainian corruption investigation in the phone call, which you conveniently left out of your quote. This investigation was not specifically about H****r. It was a corruption investigation involving many Ukrainian companies including the one H****r was on the board of.

Secondly, Rudy was investigating Biden's involvement relating to his public brag about threatening a foreign government BEFORE Biden entered the p**********l race. The investigation was not instituted to bring down a campaign rival as Biden was not yet running.
Trump specifically referred to the Ukrainian corru... (show quote)


Maybe Trump is clairvoyant and knew Biden would enter the race and have no chance of winning anyway! LOLOL!!!!

Reply
Oct 13, 2019 14:18:29   #
debeda
 
JoyV wrote:
Trump specifically referred to the Ukrainian corruption investigation in the phone call, which you conveniently left out of your quote. This investigation was not specifically about H****r. It was a corruption investigation involving many Ukrainian companies including the one H****r was on the board of.

Secondly, Rudy was investigating Biden's involvement relating to his public brag about threatening a foreign government BEFORE Biden entered the p**********l race. The investigation was not instituted to bring down a campaign rival as Biden was not yet running.
Trump specifically referred to the Ukrainian corru... (show quote)



Reply
Oct 13, 2019 14:18:50   #
debeda
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Because it's an inquiry, not an investigation. They can issue strongly worded letters with implied threats of future action like sending an account to a collection agency but they do not have subpoena power.


Right on

Reply
 
 
Oct 13, 2019 15:54:23   #
PeterS
 
JIM BETHEA wrote:
Congress can use subpoena powers for legitimate reasons but not for POLITICAL ABUSE...The Constitution does say this.....

Political abuse to one is defence of the constitution to the next guy. I'm sorry that Trump doesn't like to be investigated but it all comes with being a crook.

Reply
Oct 13, 2019 16:09:03   #
PeterS
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Tell us peter, why do you Trump h**ers avoid the FACT that Trump's favor was distinct to look into Crowdstrike?? Do you think there is some sort of code Trump was using that means something mentioned later in the conversation was actually the thing the favor was all about?? Right! LOLOL!!!!!!!

Because on page 4 of the phone call Trump directly asks him to open an investigation into Joe and H****r.

Trump: The other thing, There's a lot of talk about Biden's son, that Biden stopped the prosecution and a lot of people want to find out about that so wh**ever you can do with the Attorney General would be great. Biden went around bragging that he stopped the prosecution so if you can look into it... It sounds horrible to me.

Previously Trump asked Z to talk to Guiliani and Barr in reference to this.

Reply
Oct 13, 2019 16:11:29   #
PeterS
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Maybe Trump is clairvoyant and knew Biden would enter the race and have no chance of winning anyway! LOLOL!!!!

Or maybe Trump was simply trying to dig up dirt on a potential opponent.

Reply
Oct 13, 2019 16:38:45   #
Augusta
 
H****r B***n met with top Chinese government fund leaders alongside managing partner Devon Archer and James Bulger, the nephew of notorious mobster Whitey Bulger. The meeting took place just hours before Vice President Biden would meet with Hu Jintao, then China's president, in Washington as part of a nuclear security summit. A second meeting that year between H****r B***n and other top Chinese officials would occur in Taiwan, just two weeks after Vice President Biden opened up strategic talks with China in Washington. In 2013, the younger Biden would be part of an official U.S. delegation to China. Ten days later, Rosemont entities inked a $1 billion deal with the Bank of China. The deal was eventually increased to $1.5 billion. H****r B***n’s deals with China would go on to have serious national security implications for the United States. One such deal was with the automotive subsidiary of Aviation Industry Corporation of China (AVIC), a major Chinese military contractor accused of frequently stealing U.S. military technology. A private equity firm managed by H****r B***n struck a deal with China's state-owned bank in 2013 at the same time that Joe Biden was in the country to meet with Chinese President Xi Jinping.

As first reported by The Hill, H****r B***n, who arrived in China aboard Air Force Two alongside his father and the rest of the U.S. delegation, was at the time in control of Rosemont Seneca Partners LLC., a private equity firm.

That firm that would go on to strike a deal with the state-owned Bank of China to create a $1 billion joint investment fund.

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 3 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.