Singularity

Have I seriously affirmed my right to harm anyone who disagrees with my opinion?

To the extent DJT has championed the right to proceed to cage and neglectfully pschologically abuse or allow the death in custody of human children removed from the protection of their parents with whom we have a territorial dispute, for the expressed intention of making their parents and other families in their same situation change their behavior out of a very real fear of harm or death?

Makes your reasoning re the a******n question moot as well. If you can't reason that out, let me know. Ill draw you a picture.

Radiance3

==========
Coincidentally, I agree with debeda about her assertions on bigotry. Bigot and r****t both stand as an adjective describing a person's behavior.

**Bigot, a person who is intolerant towards those holding other opinion.

**R****t, a person who shows or feels discrimination or prejudice against people of other races, or who believes that a particular race is superior to another.

It is a scientific fact that no two people are alike. Some are dumb, stupid, mean, violent, and dishonest. And if you describe them factually, the LEFT consider you a "R****t" That is what is happening in our country these days.

You could not state any differences of people without being called a "r****t". And if you do, the left will join together and fight using physical violence, verbal and assaults.

If I am an employer, I need to select the most qualified applicant that fits the needs of my business. And it happens most of the time are the Whiteys and Asians, facts. So I chose them. Am I a r****t for doing this?

How about bigotry? Due to philosophy and ideology, different racial groups have also different standards of expectations. Fact: Those who are more knowledgeable and intelligent, are able to frame, analyze or assert an opinion that fits mostly the subject matter involved. And to the left, if you do that, you are a bigot.

These terms are all destructive to facts, that hinders progress. If we need to advance, we must factually decide that NO two people are alike. I will choose the best regardless of race.

President Trump is neither a r****t or a bigot. His expectations have different standards than most of those who don't understand what is better choice.
The president works hard, and results of his achievement show. It benefits all race, b****s, brown, yellow, or white. However, when it comes to performance, different levels are graded due to the differences of all people involved. The best is chosen.
I will do the same. I have done this a number of times. Where on the subject matter of performance evaluation of staff members. Some grades exceeded expectations, the worst is failed to meet expectations, or needed improvements. Am I a r****t and a bigot for doing this? Yes, one employee accused me of being a r****t. But I've proven I was not. I prevailed.

Singularity

These words describe the motive behind the decision to hurt someone we disagree with or differ from.

You have said mean h**eful things that intentionally hurt me in the past. Things that would have had no conceivable redeeming quality of helping the situation except to allow you to feel superior. I have seen you do that with others. I have seen that done to you. Some things I have done may be viewed by others in the same light.

Its not so much who is right and who is wrong but whether this tactic is acceptable for any of us when we look at it in the colder light of day, or whether patience and rejection of this human tendency is preferred.

Or continued violence to each other's person.

A mythical teacher one went so far as to describe name calling as a capital offense!
Matt 5:22

Hug

Please draw me a picture.

Radiance3

==========
There was no superiority here. We must accept that no two people are alike, regardless of race or color.
I have been stating facts. You could not solve a problem if you don't lay out facts to resolve.

And to resolve matters in disagreement, we must put the equation in the perspective that could balance the situation. For me the t***h will set you free.

Singularity

Can't find a crayon, you'll have to make do with a word picture. Sorry.

If you can send a born baby to its possible death, alone without its parent, to a concentration camp or back to the situation of almost certain death they are fleeing,

When they or their parents desperately prefer to stay, because in their experience, the concentration camps are safer than what they are fleeing, then

Another woman, under approval of a government agency could, on the same principle, cause the eviction of her child from her uterus whether or not the environment to which they arrive would be comfortable or inimical to life.

How is it different? Each relocation might result in death of the baby. In one case, you claim its not your problem and approve the government support of that policy. Why not both?

Did find some pictures after all.....

So can you tell me the difference?

Singularity

it seems a fine point but it is crucial. It is he INTOLERANCE of perceived differences that motivates and energizes HARM to another person that defines bigotry. It is the HARMING of another person with this as motive, that we are all needing to talk about here.

BIGOTRY IS THE MOTIVE,

HARM IS THE CHOSEN ACTION.

One can be silent and deny their internal intolerance a v**e as they choose to affirm life and liberty to others.

Or one can submit to the desire and cause harm to others.

Which one do we wish to be?

Radiance3

================
Concerned about death of a baby? What about the 60 million aborted and k**led babies by PP since 1973? And worst is they require the innocent taxpayers to pay for their baby k*****gs.

What about the 553 thousand homeless and abandoned in most democrat controlled states? E.g, New York, California, Washington state, Chicago, etc. These are the topnotch where homeless are so pervasive.

Families and children, those sick and destroyed by Mexican drugs. They have also children. No bed to lay their heads, cold, hungry and sick. These hypocrite democrat-socialists complain about the treatment of i*****l a***ns. Fact of the matter is they are given beds, food, and medical care. But the homeless of our country, they don't care. Many of the homeless have served and sacrificed for our country, only poisoned by Mexican drugs.

For politicians, there are a number of ways helping the homeless. But they don't attempt doing that but instead, hypocritically complain how the tens of millions of illegal invaders are treated.

What are their priorities? They care only for their own to stay in their position forever. Or to get re-elected by being hypocrites.

nwtk2007 Loc: Texas

Just scanning this thread and I'm going to disagree with your assessment of Trump having a history of r****m. I think Trump sees one color; the color of money.

http://youtu.be/J5lcART6TTE

Singularity

Yes I hear you say its awful about those aborted babies having been evicted from the wombs. You want to ban that for any reason.

My question is why you can advocate or allow for harm to born babies that could be just as dreadful by evicting them from the country. I want to ban THAT for any reason.

AND FIND ANOTHER WORKABLE SOLUTION TO THE BORDER CRISES THAN VIOLENCE AGAINST CHILDREN.

That does NOT include open borders.

Michael Rich Loc: Lapine Oregon

By definition, you are a flaming bigot.

Singularity

many esoteric sk**ls....

Singularity

You just demonstrated your own bigotry.

Good job.

debeda

No, not at all. I was yanking your chain cuz you used the line "I gave you enough rope". Lots of positioning in that phraseology

debeda

Well put, Radiance