One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
We have a difference in morality...
Page 1 of 14 next> last>>
Jul 1, 2019 05:31:27   #
PeterS
 
yup...



Reply
Jul 1, 2019 06:29:51   #
Rose42
 
PeterS wrote:
yup...


Nope.

When you callously disregard life at its most innocent and champion sexual perversion in children you are not on any moral high ground.

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 06:33:14   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
PeterS wrote:
yup...


Yeah, let’s talk about l*****t morality verses conservative morality.

Rule of law to l*****ts means giving i*****l a***ns sanctuary cities and guaranteed healthcare, including the same for rapists, drug dealers and violent gang members, while our inner cities, run by l*****ts and their policies, live in squalor like 3rd world countries, whose cities have maps where the worst piles of human waste are accumulating on the streets, and young students, who should be graduating with high scholastic marks, can’t read and write let alone understand the principles of freedom, liberty and social and personal responsibility. And you l*****ts only care about belittling and denigrating and “resisting” our President Trump’s attempts at diplomacy with our enemies which trumps your disregard for US citizens every day of the week. It’s called giving them “face.” If all Trump did was to go around claiming Putin were utter evil, what could possibly be the ice breaker at a negotiation table?

You l*****t folks can’t even understand there are only two biological sexes, which are determined by c********es not by choice. And so, in full rejection of what has been the basic building blocks of society throughout the history of mankind, you would rather allow perverts the “liberty” and “right” to go into bathrooms not allocated to their biological sex and now our children are at risk of being molested in what should be safe places to relieve themselves. And now you’re even glorifying biological men in sports competitions with biological women, whom said men are being given awards for “beating” women, and you call that “progress”?

Our founders, who every one of them had high moral standards, did their level best to assure us all the “right to freedom of speech” and what have you l*****t nut jobs done with it? You’ve decided it best to stretch it to the point where people who still accept the scientific fact that it takes one man and one woman to procreate our species should be disdained as “bigots” and so you are hellbent on criminalizing our “freedom of speech” to call a man, woman, boy or girl by their biologically determined pronouns. Yeah, you l*****ts are so lovingly tolerant that nothing less than denying us our free speech will suffice for you in your battle to normalize perversion and criminalize the open expression of the by-far-superiority of biological normalcy.

You l*****t nut jobs insist on t***sforming the USA, a veritable bastion of liberty and freedom, into an ever more and more socialist country by putting more and more government programs and unelected politicians and government employees in charge of an ever expanding government knowing full well big government has always been antithetical to our Constitutional Republic, let alone that socialist and c*******tic ideologies have proven to be the most murderous ideologies know to mankind. And this is why you must vilify our President at every opportunity. Trump’s willingness to not destroy 150 people in reaction to a strike against an unmanned drone, regardless of his other human character flaws, far outweighs your pathetic sense of justice or morals.

You make champions of people like the Clintons who ran an international pay-for-play operation while selling out our government in the process to the highest bidder. And you want to preach to us about morals? Trump’s accumulation of wealth, although questionable it maybe, still far outweighs the morals of the leaders you champion. So instead of pointing fingers at each other’s politicians, why aren’t we as a people agreeing to hold all our politicians to at least the same moral standards as they hold the rest of us to? L*****ts have their extremists in Bernie Sanders and more socialism and big government, conservatives, in the other hand, create things like the tea party which was designed to hold our politicians responsible to our convictions. So the l*****t answer is more mob rule while the conservative answer is less governmental imposition and more oversight and accountability of our government.

You have t***sferred “freedom of religion” of the right of people to practice their religion into your manufactured illogical “freedom from religion”, and you can’t even see that you have become the oppressors of freedom of religion you claim to be against.

The same goes for freedom of speech, where your colleges and universities, rather than being bastions of free thinking and open discussion of opposing points of view now protest and reject the free discussion of conservative positions as evil and bigoted and you can’t even see how bigoted that is to hold your “convictions”.

The same goes for the right to bear arms, wherein the constitution of the USA recognizes the God-given right of people to keep and bare arms, both for self protection and protection against tyrannical governments, but your politicians seek every opportunity to infringe if not outright remove that fundamental right of a free people. And you are surprised that your “morals,” I should say total lack of anything resembling a moral compass, are scary indeed to us conservatives who love our freedoms and liberties and <gasp> our families consisting of one man and one woman.

And last but not least your party, no, your ideological leftism, is guilty of murdering more living human beings than can accurately be counted through a******n and you only show your willingness to grow worse and worse in justifying the snuffing out of human life up to the moment of birth if not even after that. And you can’t understand or fathom our outrage? Yeah, that is a serious difference in morals.

When you can show you have even the most basic of understanding of these fundamental yet simple concepts of social morals, then, perhaps we could find some common ground.

Until then, I’m more than willing to contend for the morals held by conservatives. We are obviously in a war over morals, and with every ignorant post you l*****ts post, and every “regressive” step you take to eradicate true morals, you only make my resolve stronger to speak out against the moral outrage that is leftism now going under the false banner, or we could say false f**g, of “progressivism”. If you can’t even be honest with yourself about your identity, how could anyone ever expect you to be honest about your goals and agenda?

And we know this is the real reason you l*****ts are waging an all out war against our duly elected President.
So be it, if it takes a “monster” like Trump to wake people up to your excesses: I will continue to support him, not as my pastor, or other “spiritual” mentor or model, but for the simple purpose of making sure folks with such twisted morals as those in your l*****t camp can be silenced and defeated at every attempt of influencing this world with their amoral corruption.

Reply
 
 
Jul 1, 2019 06:34:30   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
PeterS wrote:
yup...


When you aren't smart enough to realize that a large percentage of the adults are not the children's parents, we have a difference in intelligence.

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 06:52:43   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
When you aren't smart enough to realize that a large percentage of the adults are not the children's parents, we have a difference in intelligence.


I’d agree, except, they do hear it, but in their minds, the ends justify the means, therefore, it’s back to being primarily a morality issue. In this case simple dishonesty on their part.

Case in point: they do realize that the criminals they protect in sanctuary cities will offend again, but the end justifies the means. Their amorality rules their agenda.

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 07:34:25   #
ACP45 Loc: Rhode Island
 
PeterS wrote:
yup...


Peter, don't your realize that those "innocent young kids" are being used as pawns by the cartels, and NGO's -

"Flores encourages UAC [unaccompanied alien children] to enter the United States illegally and encourages the parents of UAC to hire smugglers to bring them to the United States because they know that those children are almost guaranteed to be released into their custody. Further – and this is the worst part – it encourages people to bring their own children – why are those kids going through hell? Why are people bringing their kids with them – or the people who they claim to be their kids with them – to make that perilous journey to the United States? Because they know it is likely that they are going to be released within 20 days of getting to this country if they travel with children.”

- "Then, the Flores Settlement Agreement comes into effect in 2016. We can’t hold families, can’t hold unaccompanied – or we can’t hold accompanied alien children for more than 20 days. Families come in with kids and the number gets bumped up again. We see a huge surge coming again in 2016.

Most of those aliens did not evade apprehension, but turned themselves in to the first law enforcement officers that they came to. Why did they do that? Because they wanted to take advantage of the loopholes in our i*********n l*ws that they knew were going to facilitate the release into the United States."

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 07:35:47   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
TommyRadd wrote:
I’d agree, except, they do hear it, but in their minds, the ends justify the means, therefore, it’s back to being primarily a morality issue. In this case simple dishonesty on their part.

Case in point: they do realize that the criminals they protect in sanctuary cities will offend again, but the end justifies the means. Their amorality rules their agenda.


Every day, children of US citizens are separated from their parents when their parents are criminals. Why should foreigners get preferential treatment?

Reply
 
 
Jul 1, 2019 07:39:47   #
waltmoreno
 
PeterS wrote:
yup...


Typical psychopathic behavior! Accuse your opponent of the very offense you yourself are exponentially guilty of.
All psychopath’s do this as they have no empathy or conscience and seek the status of victim to elevate their stature among the uninformed.

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 07:53:46   #
Liberty Tree
 
PeterS wrote:
yup...


Over 60 million murdered unborn children for any reason tells us all about your lack of morality.

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 07:54:16   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Every day, children of US citizens are separated from their parents when their parents are criminals. Why should foreigners get preferential treatment?


I agree with you 100%!

Their false moral outrage is just that: false moral outrage.

They attempt to use “morality” against the moral just like they attempt to use “freedom of speech” against the ones who gave them freedom of speech.

In any given example, all they have is a poor substitute, a counterfeit of the original.

Without an understanding of the purpose behind the morals, they are left with nothing but a false pretense for claiming morals.

In every area of morality, they are nothing but a facade “a false, superficial, or artificial appearance or effect.”

The parable of the king’s new clothes couldn’t be more applicable to these “pretend moralists”.

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 07:58:27   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
waltmoreno wrote:
Typical psychopathic behavior! Accuse your opponent of the very offense you yourself are exponentially guilty of.
All psychopath’s do this as they have no empathy or conscience and seek the status of victim to elevate their stature among the uninformed.


Which also explains why it is impossible to get through to them through reasoning, which also explains why they go into “mental breakdown” mode and thus run in escape to their safe spaces at the hint of intellectual inspection of the shortcomings of their ideologies!

Reply
 
 
Jul 1, 2019 08:03:42   #
PeterS
 
Liberty Tree wrote:
Over 60 million murdered unborn children for any reason tells us all about your lack of morality.
And once they are born you people could give an absolute flying fuk...



Reply
Jul 1, 2019 08:04:34   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
What do you want to bet that PeterS won’t be engaging herein intellectually with any of the counter arguments to his most feeble attempt at a boast of moral superiority?

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 08:07:47   #
TommyRadd Loc: Midwest USA
 
PeterS wrote:
And once they are born you people could give an absolute flying fuk...


Not true at all and you know it. Our response is to get the i***t l*****t politicians v**ed out of office and get constitutional conservatives v**ed in.

Creating an environment of liberty and justice for all is among the most caring things anyone can do.

Creating a mob-rule government that steals from wage earners to support the entitlement-minded masses is hardly “true” compassion.

Reply
Jul 1, 2019 08:43:43   #
Parky60 Loc: People's Republic of Illinois
 
PeterS wrote:
And once they are born you people could give an absolute flying fuk...

And you "give an absolute flying fuk" enough to murder them in the womb....

Reply
Page 1 of 14 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.