What I'm saying is, if someone is trying to dish on a political opponent, hear them out and turn them in. Unless they're just nuts then laugh at them.
Hope all is well Rumi I havent been on much, was working on a grassroots thing ALTHOUGH it didn't matter because our POS new dem governor and his POS dem state supermajority passed the late term a******n law in Illinois, and then was crowing about it. I am beside myself

Once again,the president,the secretary of state,the FBI,the CIA,were certainly within their jurisdictional boundaries to investigate and surveil any citizen seen fraternizing with known enemies of the U.S..Had they not did this,they would not have been doing their jobs.

As for Trump,admitting he would except and welcome the espionage congruities and use it against a competing political opponent,(remember Trump Jr.said this particular circumstances arose,and he did not)this is an admission that he would collude.Trump and his supporters are not in accord with that age old saying of. - `A rose by any other name is still a rose", - his supporters contending that there is no such thing as collusion in the Constitution[Which shackles those law enforcement officials that are annointed the duties of pursuing such high crimes and misdemeanors and applying the appropriate punitivness,]from using the word Collusion,they will have to settle for the more mundane,words of Conspiracy,
or Treason; of course Trump,in all is majestic brilliance probaly can't see it that way.The country that supplies info,with the intention of manipulating an e******n so that their preferred candidate wins is violating and breaking Constitutional laws. ( in this case,Trump is the preferred candidate) .Whether they commit this act because they feel as though their preference is the less formidable candidate,or whether their preference has some kind of unknown allegiance to the provider of said information is academic,laws have been broken.