debeda wrote:
What I'm saying is, if someone is trying to dish on a political opponent, hear them out and turn them in. Unless they're just nuts then laugh at them.
Hope all is well Rumi I havent been on much, was working on a grassroots thing ALTHOUGH it didn't matter because our POS new dem governor and his POS dem state supermajority passed the late term a******n law in Illinois, and then was crowing about it. I am beside myself
What I'm saying is, if someone is trying to dish o... (
show quote)
No, do not hear them out. To do so is unethical. Contact authorities at first approach to avoid any accusation of impropriety.
rumitoid wrote:
Well, then, God speed for her.
She got tired of putting a spin on all of Trump's dumb stupidity,she reached her breaking point.He mucked up so virociously,she no longer in all good faith could hold her head up high and maintain any type of dignity.,I'm surprised she did that as long as she did.I figured she must be desperate for a job,or either just as big as Jack -off as Trump.
rumitoid wrote:
No, do not hear them out. To do so is unethical. Contact authorities at first approach to avoid any accusation of impropriety.
That's what Jr did,supposedly.He said the Russian made a similar offer,and says he didn't use it and that's as far as it went.It kind of makes one wonder;A Russian is openly trying to influence U.S. e******ns,Admittedly Jr. Knew of it,and he did not turn the Russian in,he said nothing about until it was inquired about while he and his daddy were being scrutinized.You also have to wonder why he said anything about it-he didn't have to,no one would have known the better.
rumitoid wrote:
Wow. Please do not beat around the bush, hoho, say what's on your mind.
Despite the standard definition of Liberal and what is commonly accepted as the characteristics of Progressives, your descriptions of their characteristics are the opposite of what the Right almost always accuses them. How can you defend calling them "heartless degenerates" when the usual moniker and major condemnation is "bleeding heart"?
You whine about them being sickeningly PC tolerant of all manner of social behavior and now claim that they are intolerant?
You say they have no standards or moral code, following anything novel or new discovery, but now say that they are "rigid, uncompromising, inflexible."
You cannot have it both ways. Make up your mind, not to just what suits you this moment of h**e and anger but consistently.
Your rancid hyperbole about the character of people who see differently from you, however right or wrong, is a fierce judgment against your Christian faith. Love your enemy. This display of yours of such loathsome enmity for others is something you need to pray on long and hard and find a confessor.
Wow. Please do not beat around the bush, hoho, say... (
show quote)
O Snap! Brain fart. Momentary lapse of reason. It simply slipped my mind that democrats, or liberals, or progressives, or socialists, or wh**ever label is fashionable these days are the most perfect human beings on earth.
Why, hell they were born to rule. They are without blemish, flawless. They make no mistakes, no wrong decisions, no poor choices, and when they pass judgement on someone, it is final, condemnation is absolute.
Tread lightly, folks, keep your heads bowed, don't say a cross word about these godly creatures. We are in the presence of saints here.
rumitoid wrote:
Wow. Please do not beat around the bush, hoho, say what's on your mind.
Despite the standard definition of Liberal and what is commonly accepted as the characteristics of Progressives, your descriptions of their characteristics are the opposite of what the Right almost always accuses them. How can you defend calling them "heartless degenerates" when the usual moniker and major condemnation is "bleeding heart"?
You whine about them being sickeningly PC tolerant of all manner of social behavior and now claim that they are intolerant?
You say they have no standards or moral code, following anything novel or new discovery, but now say that they are "rigid, uncompromising, inflexible."
You cannot have it both ways. Make up your mind, not to just what suits you this moment of h**e and anger but consistently.
Your rancid hyperbole about the character of people who see differently from you, however right or wrong, is a fierce judgment against your Christian faith. Love your enemy. This display of yours of such loathsome enmity for others is something you need to pray on long and hard and find a confessor.
Wow. Please do not beat around the bush, hoho, say... (
show quote)
Great job of describing yourself!!!!!
rumitoid wrote:
Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano said there’s not much room for interpretation when it comes to President Donald Trump’s claim that he’d “listen” if a foreign power offered dirt on a political rival.
“He would be committing a felony,” Napolitano told host Shepard Smith on Thursday.
Trump this week said “there’s nothing wrong with listening” to dirt on an opponent, no matter what the source.
“They have information,” he said in an ABC interview. “I think I’d take it.”
Napolitano said that would be a crime, and there’s “no wiggle room” as the Federal E******n Commission has in previous cases decided that opposition research is considered a “thing of value.”
Under the law, a candidate can’t receive anything of value from a foreign national related to a U.S. e******n.
And that means Trump would be committing a crime.
“The president of the United States of America is prepared to commit a felony to get reelected,” he said. “That was my reaction, and it was not a happy one.”
Napolitano also said that whoever gives the president that info would also be committing a felony.
Fox News senior judicial analyst Andrew Napolitano... (
show quote)
If this had ACTUALL happened (like with hilLIARy) it would be a big deal --- but it didn't it was a hypothetical question with a hypothetical answer. So now you are suggesting some one should go to jail for something that DID NOT happen. Do you realize how unhinged you sound. You really need to see a psychotherapist about you TDS !!!!!!
To bring back a little history, they know so much that's not true.
archie bunker wrote:
You know this because?
Because you don't know it's dirt until you listen and on top of that it's hypothetical!
rumitoid wrote:
Do you have a clue to ethics? The very offer is a breach of his office. Why would he offer to listen to dirt on a political opponent? Upon contact with a foreign national offering it is where you call the FBI and refuse to listen, not see if it is juicy enough for gain. Jeez louise, get some moral spine and not cowtow to that brute Trump all the time out of h**e for liberals.
If you want to reply, then
register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.