One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
AG Barr Is About To Declassify Docs That Implicate Barry In The Spying On Trump
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
Jun 3, 2019 13:19:42   #
Louie27 Loc: Peoria, AZ
 
kemmer wrote:
I remember Trump telling the Russian ambassador that all was OK now that he'd gotten rid of Comey and his investigation. Tellingly, no American press was allowed in the room, only the Russian press.


I don't remember those words as being proven. I also remember Obama telling a Russian diplomat that he would have more, I think the word was, latitude, once he has won the e******n. That seems like a plot against the American people, by Obama and for the Russians.

Reply
Jun 3, 2019 14:40:47   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Who'da thunk you'd find magic in cow crap?


Dung beetles, maybe?



Reply
Jun 3, 2019 14:41:30   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Louie27 wrote:
I don't remember those words as being proven. I also remember Obama telling a Russian diplomat that he would have more, I think the word was, latitude, once he has won the e******n. That seems like a plot against the American people, by Obama and for the Russians.


Seems like some folks have very selective memories.

Reply
Jun 3, 2019 16:27:51   #
Pariahjf
 
Just because there's no crime doesn't mean he's not guilty. In this case, it's either going to be conspiracy or intent----his actions proved his intent, and people get sentenced in other criminal cases based on INTENT----even if there was no crime.
Intent to manufacture narcotics, intent to distribute narcotics, intent to commit perjury----they haven't committed the crimes YET, but their actions show that at some point that they will. Read the report!!!

Reply
Jun 3, 2019 17:08:57   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
Pariahjf wrote:
Just because there's no crime doesn't mean he's not guilty. In this case, it's either going to be conspiracy or intent----his actions proved his intent, and people get sentenced in other criminal cases based on INTENT----even if there was no crime.
Intent to manufacture narcotics, intent to distribute narcotics, intent to commit perjury----they haven't committed the crimes YET, but their actions show that at some point that they will. Read the report!!!


The report said categorically there was NO collusion. How do you obstruct the investigation of a non-crime, that the investigators KNEW was a non-crime, when the warrants for the investigation were obtained on perjured testimony?

Reply
Jun 3, 2019 17:15:09   #
Pariahjf
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
The report said categorically there was NO collusion. How do you obstruct the investigation of a non-crime, that the investigators KNEW was a non-crime, when the warrants for the investigation were obtained on perjured testimony?



Maybe you should be asking that question to prosecutors who get convictions on intent (with no crime) all the time.

Reply
Jun 3, 2019 18:26:35   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Kevyn wrote:
Our intelligence apparatus was spying on the Russians and in the process found that Trump and his henchmen were in bed with Putin. This is night and day different than “spying on Trump” it is simply doing their job of protecting our nation. Sadly they failed and a T*****r now lives in the White House.


Yer drivin in reverse there boy.
The CIA and FBI and DOJ set this up to make it look like they were spying on Russians so that they could prevent Trump from being elected. There was no Russian spying, and no Russian hacking. It was Seth Rich who sent a thumbnail to Wikileaks. No hack. No Russians.

Reply
Jun 3, 2019 18:28:43   #
Brad1040
 
In bed with Putin. Where do you get this crap?

Reply
Jun 3, 2019 18:35:34   #
bahmer
 
Brad1040 wrote:
In bed with Putin. Where do you get this crap?


Brad1040 there are three tabs below each post and they are as follows. | Reply | Quote Reply | Report Issue The Reply allows you to only reply to someones quote which is hat you have been using. The Quote reply tab allows you to reply as well but also brings in the other persons handle as well as there quote. Thay way we all know who you are responding to and what they said which makes following a whole lot easier. And finally there is the report issue tag and that is to report an issue to administration. Please use the quote reply in the future thanks.

Reply
Jun 4, 2019 01:08:18   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Kevyn wrote:
Who the hell is “my boy” the Mueller report exposes 11 instances of obstruction of justice. Plenty of obstruction and not a word in the report about collusion one way or the other and we still haven’t seen the important parts of the heavily redacted report.


Whoever told you that is a legal numb nut.

Reply
Jun 4, 2019 01:09:11   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Pariahjf wrote:
Maybe you should be asking that question to prosecutors who get convictions on intent (with no crime) all the time.


Gee...let's drop the hammer on Klinton, then!

Reply
Jun 4, 2019 01:11:14   #
BigMike Loc: yerington nv
 
Pariahjf wrote:
Just because there's no crime doesn't mean he's not guilty. In this case, it's either going to be conspiracy or intent----his actions proved his intent, and people get sentenced in other criminal cases based on INTENT----even if there was no crime.
Intent to manufacture narcotics, intent to distribute narcotics, intent to commit perjury----they haven't committed the crimes YET, but their actions show that at some point that they will. Read the report!!!


Horses**t. This isn't the Soviet Union or Red China. You guys have lost your minds.

Reply
Jun 4, 2019 08:10:16   #
Smedley_buzkill
 
BigMike wrote:
Horses**t. This isn't the Soviet Union or Red China. You guys have lost your minds.


He doesn't seem to realize that intent to commit a crime, and refusal to enable a witch hunt past a certain point are not the same thing. Liberals have trouble with nuances.

Reply
Jun 4, 2019 08:32:39   #
Mikeyavelli
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
He doesn't seem to realize that intent to commit a crime, and refusal to enable a witch hunt past a certain point are not the same thing. Liberals have trouble with nuances.


The kommiecrats are going to pass a law saying that if the current president puts his feet on the floor while getting out of bed, that is an impeachable offence. They are going to get Trump on something, anything, because Trump isn't fighting back.

Reply
Jun 4, 2019 08:35:48   #
nwtk2007 Loc: Texas
 
BigMike wrote:
BCP has it covered! Copied at 8:36 into discussion...

Black Conservative Patriot

Published on Jun 1, 2019

https://youtu.be/LFfEGaW6QQE?t=516


It's coming. I hear, actually from a less reliable source, there are sealed indictments accompanying that release.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 4 of 5 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.