One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Finland Government Collapses
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
Apr 28, 2019 12:08:06   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
Smedley_buzk**l wrote:
Right up until the system collapses. Finland has a very homogenous population of 5.5 million. Maybe you think their system will work in an extremely diverse nation of 330 million. Why is our healthcare expensive? Maybe because we have 8% of the world's population and more than 75% of the lawyers? I have a family member who is a physician, never had a claim filed against him and his malpractice insurance is around $150,000. By the time he pays for this, pays on his lease, and his staff and all the other expenses, he has to make around $250,000 before he buys a baloney sandwich. Juries that award outrageous multi-million dollar claims and think they are sticking it to the system don't seem to realize they are screwing themselves. The only real winners are the lawyers.
Right up until the system collapses. Finland has a... (show quote)




It would seem that big pharma and the owners of medical care and medical insurance are also big winners.

Darn that means the only losers are the American citizens..

coincidence??,,, we are also the only industrialized nation which does not have a national health care plan..



Reply
Apr 28, 2019 12:36:11   #
son of witless
 
permafrost wrote:
I could not tell you, did not know we were going to look at Japans population..


The relevance of my point is this. We are discussing the problem of Finland's Socialist Health Care system. The side I agree with points to yet another failure of Socialism, whereas your side declares that Finlamd's problem is not Socialism, but an aging population. Okay. So I brought up Japan because as far as I can tell they have the oldest population on earth. I believe their's is also a Socialist Medical system and it has not collapsed. Not yet, anyway.

So if Japan has an even older population than Finland and both have Socialist Health Care, perhaps Japan has figured out solutions that would work in Finland, or maybe Japan has unique factors which cannot be duplicated elsewhere.

Reply
Apr 28, 2019 12:54:02   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
son of witless wrote:
The relevance of my point is this. We are discussing the problem of Finland's Socialist Health Care system. The side I agree with points to yet another failure of Socialism, whereas your side declares that Finlamd's problem is not Socialism, but an aging population. Okay. So I brought up Japan because as far as I can tell they have the oldest population on earth. I believe their's is also a Socialist Medical system and it has not collapsed. Not yet, anyway.

So if Japan has an even older population than Finland and both have Socialist Health Care, perhaps Japan has figured out solutions that would work in Finland, or maybe Japan has unique factors which cannot be duplicated elsewhere.
The relevance of my point is this. We are discussi... (show quote)



Perhaps Japan has, if you find some, please post it..

As for Finland, as I see it we were discussing that the Govt which resigned could not agree to the compromises needed to make the program work. not the program itself..

Again, the out going government was right leaning, not socialist..



Reply
 
 
Apr 29, 2019 10:06:05   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
Kevyn wrote:
It was thoroughly covered in the Times and the Washington Post.


I never seen it. Not even of FOX!

Reply
Apr 29, 2019 11:02:16   #
MR Mister Loc: Washington DC
 
son of witless wrote:
Isn't Japan's population even older than Finland ? I wonder why they seem to do better on costs ?


The difference is Finland does not make Lexus cars or Sony TV's.

Reply
Apr 29, 2019 19:27:38   #
son of witless
 
permafrost wrote:
Perhaps Japan has, if you find some, please post it..

As for Finland, as I see it we were discussing that the Govt which resigned could not agree to the compromises needed to make the program work. not the program itself..

Again, the out going government was right leaning, not socialist..


Did the Right Leaning Government create the program, or did it inherit it ? Just as in Amerika, once you give the Publik free stuff it can be impossible to take it back. Perhaps the Right Leaning Guvment, inherited the program, could not eliminate it, could not politically convince the publik to endure the painful steps to reform it, and therefore quit.

Reply
Apr 30, 2019 09:21:31   #
permafrost Loc: Minnesota
 
son of witless wrote:
Did the Right Leaning Government create the program, or did it inherit it ? Just as in Amerika, once you give the Publik free stuff it can be impossible to take it back. Perhaps the Right Leaning Guvment, inherited the program, could not eliminate it, could not politically convince the publik to endure the painful steps to reform it, and therefore quit.



That is a good question. I could not find any thing about dates or which parties involved but this shows it was the policy for some time..

Seems the need for reform was pretty much agreed on, but the how-to was the devil..




https://www.politico.eu/article/finlands-government-collapses-over-failed-health-care-reform/

Sipilä resigned a month ahead of Finland's parliamentary e******n | Ludovic Marin/AFP via Getty Images

Finland’s government collapses over failed health care reform
PM Juha Sipilä resigns.

By ELINE SCHAART, LILI BAYER AND KATIE JENNINGS 3/8/19, 9:47 AM CET Updated 4/19/19, 1:13 AM CET
Finland's Prime Minister Juha Sipilä resigned Friday morning, one month ahead of an e******n.

"The social welfare and health care reform was one of our government's most important objectives," Sipilä said at a press briefing. "The snapshot of the situation that I got from the parliament obliged me to examine if there was a possibility of continuing the reform process. There wasn't."

My conclusion was that my government had to hand in our note of resignation," he added. "I take my responsibility."

Finland has a decentralized system of health and social welfare programs, where much of the administration is left to local municipalities. This arrangement has led to widespread geographic variation when it comes to quality and access to health care services.

The reform was meant to address these inequalities and reduce the growing cost of the country's health care system, which has come under increasing stress from an ageing population. It included centralization of the administration at a regional level.

Last month, Sipilä spoke to POLITICO about the “very difficult” social and health care changes, calling them the country’s “biggest reform since the Second World War.”

“The publicity and discussion and debate during the process we have had in Finland, it has been painful, and it shows that people are afraid of change,” he said.

There has been general agreement among political parties of the need to reform the system. However, the parties differ when it comes to the finer details, which has led to the current impasse.



Sipilä’s Center Party had agreed to some reforms pushed for by the center-right National Coalition Party that would allow for more privatization of health care services, but this move was fiercely opposed by the left-leaning and Green parties, Laura Kalliomaa-Puha, a professor of social welfare law at Tampere University, said.

“It has been politically extremely difficult,” Kalliomaa-Puha said.

“Prime Minister Sipilä will request to resign because the health care reform cannot be accomplished during this government term,” Antti Kaikkonen, the head of Sipilä’s Center Party’s parliamentary group wrote on Twitter. He added: "If anyone asks what political responsibility means, then I would say this is an example of that."

According to local media, President Sauli Niinistö asked Sipilä to remain in office as a caretaker PM until an April 14 parliamentary e******n.

Reply
 
 
Apr 30, 2019 18:33:08   #
son of witless
 
permafrost wrote:
That is a good question. I could not find any thing about dates or which parties involved but this shows it was the policy for some time..

Seems the need for reform was pretty much agreed on, but the how-to was the devil..




https://www.politico.eu/article/finlands-government-collapses-over-failed-health-care-reform/

Sipilä resigned a month ahead of Finland's parliamentary e******n | Ludovic Marin/AFP via Getty Images

Finland’s government collapses over failed health care reform
PM Juha Sipilä resigns.

By ELINE SCHAART, LILI BAYER AND KATIE JENNINGS 3/8/19, 9:47 AM CET Updated 4/19/19, 1:13 AM CET
Finland's Prime Minister Juha Sipilä resigned Friday morning, one month ahead of an e******n.

"The social welfare and health care reform was one of our government's most important objectives," Sipilä said at a press briefing. "The snapshot of the situation that I got from the parliament obliged me to examine if there was a possibility of continuing the reform process. There wasn't."

My conclusion was that my government had to hand in our note of resignation," he added. "I take my responsibility."

Finland has a decentralized system of health and social welfare programs, where much of the administration is left to local municipalities. This arrangement has led to widespread geographic variation when it comes to quality and access to health care services.

The reform was meant to address these inequalities and reduce the growing cost of the country's health care system, which has come under increasing stress from an ageing population. It included centralization of the administration at a regional level.

Last month, Sipilä spoke to POLITICO about the “very difficult” social and health care changes, calling them the country’s “biggest reform since the Second World War.”

“The publicity and discussion and debate during the process we have had in Finland, it has been painful, and it shows that people are afraid of change,” he said.

There has been general agreement among political parties of the need to reform the system. However, the parties differ when it comes to the finer details, which has led to the current impasse.



Sipilä’s Center Party had agreed to some reforms pushed for by the center-right National Coalition Party that would allow for more privatization of health care services, but this move was fiercely opposed by the left-leaning and Green parties, Laura Kalliomaa-Puha, a professor of social welfare law at Tampere University, said.

“It has been politically extremely difficult,” Kalliomaa-Puha said.

“Prime Minister Sipilä will request to resign because the health care reform cannot be accomplished during this government term,” Antti Kaikkonen, the head of Sipilä’s Center Party’s parliamentary group wrote on Twitter. He added: "If anyone asks what political responsibility means, then I would say this is an example of that."

According to local media, President Sauli Niinistö asked Sipilä to remain in office as a caretaker PM until an April 14 parliamentary e******n.
That is a good question. I could not find any thin... (show quote)


I think that since the left believes this program can be salvaged, that they should be given the chance. The l*****ts were successful in blocking the Center Right Party in it's reforms, I would sit back allow the whole thing to collapse totally. The L*****ts reforms will likely hasten that considerably.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 3
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.