Mr, This is old news and was all over the legitimate press in early March..

Kevyn short post covers this very well..


It is not as bad as it sounds as the e******ns, now over, were expected to replace the center-right government with some more poised to compromise..

this Link has a pretty good report on the whole problem..

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/03/08/finlands-government-resigns-after-healthcare-reform-fails.html


Finland’s government resigned on Friday after ditching plans to reform the healthcare system, a key policy, the Finnish president’s office said, throwing the country into political limbo.

The president approved Prime Minister Juha Sipila’s resignation and asked his government to continue as a care-taker government until a new cabinet has been appointed.

The collapse of the government comes just one month before parliamentary e******ns are due, after Sipila failed to push through the reforms. The changes were crucial to the three-party governing coalition’s plan to balance public finances.

Financial constraints are colliding with the healthcare costs imposed by Finland’s fast-ageing population. But cutting those costs is a major political obstacle in a Nordic country that historically has provided an extensive -- and expensive -- healthcare system.

Sipila resigned “because the healthcare reform cannot be accomplished during this government term,” Antti Kaikkonen, the head of Sipila’s Center Party’s parliamentary group, wrote on Twitter. Several governments have tried to push through reforms in different forms over the past 12 years.

“Since e******ns were already set for 14 April, the resignation of the government is not a big deal at all at this point. Still, it does create some ugly headlines,” Nordea’s chief analyst wrote on Twitter.

According to the government, the reform could have curbed the annual growth of Finland’s public social and healthcare expenses to 0.9 percent from the current estimate of 2.4 percent between 2019 and 2029.

Sipila had previously said he would dissolve his center-right coalition government if it failed to push through its healthcare and local government reform.

Don't look now seriously, the media really don't want you to look but Finland, the Democrat Socialists most favored nation, their example of the country America should emulate, just saw its government collapse and its Prime Minister and Cabinet resign due to the unsustainable costs of universal health care.

This happened last week. Did you hear about it from our great MSM in the news? Didn't think so.

https://legali**********n.com/2019/03/finland-government-collapses-over-universal-health-care-costs-bernie2020-hardest-hit/

This comes less than a year after Finland k**led its experiment with a universal basic income, replacing it with mandatory job training and work requirements for people on government benefits.

There's more at the link, along with a few ironic tweets from Bernie Sanders, lavishing praise on Finland. In one, he demands, If Finland can provide everyone with health care, send everyone to college for free and provide affordable child care, why can't the US?

Well, Finland can't. Neither can you, Bernie.

DID YOU EVER WONDER IF BERNIE WANTS THE SAME FOR AMERICA?

What? People aging? Here's a little newsflash for you: People, everywhere, whether it be Finland, the United States or Timbuktu, all age. Not only that, but they all age at precisely the same rate. At this time next year, we will all, all of us, every single one, be precisely one year older, hence we will have aged by a year, same as everybody else in the universe. That the whole universe, with a 'U'.

The fact that the Finnish government blamed the collapse of their socialist healthcare system on people aging is preposterous. As if they designed a system that was incapable of understanding that people get older.

Here's another newsflash for you: It did not collapse because people age, it collapsed because it was designed on an unsustainable basis, a basis we here in the free world call socialism, an economic and political theory advocating governmental ownership and administration of the means of production and distribution of goods.

Socialism only has one problem:

https://www.reddit.com/r/CapitalismVSocialism/comments/4es1yn/can_you_name_one_successful_socialist_country/

Does that clear it up for you?