Do you seriously believe Barr would jeopardize his own career and reputation?

Why don’t you have anything to say about Rosenstein being with Barr going over the report and helping formulate the conclusions drawn?

Why didn’t Mueller want to see the finished product by Barr having refused to do so on two separate occasions when Barr offered him the opportunity?

Why haven’t the Democrats that Barr offered to allow review the report but not being able to copy any of it and not leaking any of it, refuse his offer? The only reason they want the Unredacted report is to try to find something against Trump even at this late date...

I am pointing to one topic, and it's a topic that clearly divides people by partisan lines...and I'm sorry but in this case the right has taken their stand based on ignorance and rhetoric that came out before the report did. Now it's time to read the report because the early ignorance based positions are clearly wrong.

So at this time an argument between the right and the left is being engaged by a right that refuses to read the actual points that were made where Trump could easily be successfully indicted and prosecuted just with what can be read in the redacted report. The person arguing that there is nothing there who has refused to read the report is being well beyond ignorant and deeply in the realm of stupid.

So simply recognize that by definition, if you are refusing to read the report you are coming from the ignorant side of things... no, the l*****t arguing that the report has many examples of clear obstruction of justice that could easily be successfully indicted and prosecuted. Congress has the ability to use the case for obstruction as the key tool for impeachment on the grounds that the law was broken to a degree that it requires prosecution after an impeachment.

So Rose, read at least the section on McGahn, it is fully developed and proved to the degree any decent prosecutor could successfully prosecute. Trump's stupidity is not understanding that white house attorneys do not work for him, they work for the country and it's people first as a priority. To ask a white house attorney or intelligence head to lie to the people is breaking the law, and Trump does that as a rule.

Barr has an established reputation covering up white house scandal in the Contra affair, his personal hand was in pardoning five people who were criminally involved, thereby making the case go away.

Barr crossed the line of complete fabrication in terms of what he represented about the Mueller report. Mueller clearly represented that it was not the DOJ's position to prosecute and he meant Barr as well. Barr represented that it was his decision to exonerate or state that crimes had been found, and that is not true.

Barr made a joke out of the non partisan position that needs to be maintained by the DOJ and AG.

Dems refused the offer because they are going to be able to get the unredacted report with no terms such as Barr was offering. The right likes to represent that the left leaks classified information, but the right has as a standard operating procedure taken classified information right to the press or white house. Nunes and his midnight run admitted he thought the white house and president needed to know what was known about him.

Personally I think Barr is seriously screwed when we see what has been redacted for no reason except that it was toxic to Trump. I think that his color coding is about fighting types of information, and when one type is "lost" to court releases, the other "colors" might be safe until other arguments are made against them, and then we'll see things that didn't really fit the designated reason for redaction.

Are these the questions?

Do you seriously believe Barr would jeopardize his own career and reputation?

Woodguru showed in a previous post what Barr cares about his reputation.

Why don’t you have anything to say about Rosenstein being with Barr going over the report and helping formulate the conclusions drawn?

Rosentein was on his way out, I guess they made him an offer he could not refuse. Now he is another Barr.

Why didn’t Mueller want to see the finished product by Barr having refused to do so on two separate occasions when Barr offered him the opportunity?

Mueller prepared the finished product, with summaries. Barr changed the results summary.

Why haven’t the Democrats that Barr offered to allow review the report but not being able to copy any of it and not leaking any of it, refuse his offer? The only reason they want the Unredacted report is to try to find something against Trump even at this late date...

Barr has lied from the beginning. He does not want the actual facts to come out. The unredacted report will show all the crimes of criminal one.

So Rosenstein the one appointed and running the show is now just another Barr because he agreed with Bars summary?? Okkk got it..

Mueller chose not to review Barrs summary which means he wasn’t worried about it knowing he had answered in his summary finding and Barr would recite him ... ok, got it.. How do you know Barr changed Mueller's summary???

Barr offered the report to dems contingent upon no copying, or leaking info contained in it.. They refused to read it because he invoked privilege keeping the report confidential..Thats all they want it for to begin with is to leak and twist what they can of it...