Funny that the point is made about whether you take it upon yourself to actually read and understand it though isn't it? This is proof of who prefers ignorance and which side goes with the reality, it doesn't get clearer than this. Who is going to win an argument, the one quoting the facts or the one repeating the rhetoric that is clueless about the facts? By the way, that isn't a trick or even tricky question, it's obvious.

Do yourselves a favor, read just the section that deals with McGahn, he refused to do what Trump wanted him too, and it got far worse when Trump then wanted him to take his objections out of the record, which he also refused to do.

Trump is treading violating a law that could result in him being put in jail for ten years by telling McGahn and the security clearance guy not to testify before the senate. There is a specific law regarding influencing testimony that he is directly violating multiple times with different people.Talk about stupid, that is Trump interfering with people who are now civilians testifying.

The Mueller report is the proof of two distinct factions, on one side we have people who can see that obviously the report is long and heavily detailed, it can't possibly be read in a weekend.

Yet we have seen a narrative come out before the report was even released, Barr literally lied and misrepresented both what the report did in fact say, and put a spin to what it was saying that it did not. Of course right wing media and those in the GOP who have covered for Trump when they were in control of the house are running that narrative, nothing there, full exoneration, might as well burn it, we don't need it anymore.

Meanwhile, despite the narrative that people are s**k of this and want it over, books on the actual report and breakdowns of the case that Mueller made against Trump, cases of actual evidence necessary to fully indict and prosecute. Mueller didn't say there wasn't enough evidence to indict, he said it was the policy of the DOJ not to, and that includes it not being Barr's position to take a political stance either.

People owe it to themselves and this country to learn everything they can about what the report actually says, it is the only way anybody can be talking intelligently.

Anyone who has taken a position early on and refuses to engage in anything the report actually says is well beyond ignorance. I don't know what to say about anyone who argues the position that isn't basing arguments on what the report says, but what Barr, Trump, FOX, and right wing media sources. This is the issue where people can easily see and figure out who is lying to them, because it doesn't get better than being in black and white print.

The Mueller report is the proof of two distinct factions, on one side we have people who can see that obviously the report is long and heavily detailed, it can't possibly be read in a weekend.

Yet we have seen a narrative come out before the report was even released, Barr literally lied and misrepresented both what the report did in fact say, and put a spin to what it was saying that it did not. Of course right wing media and those in the GOP who have covered for Trump when they were in control of the house are running that narrative, nothing there, full exoneration, might as well burn it, we don't need it anymore.

Meanwhile, despite the narrative that people are s**k of this and want it over, books on the actual report and breakdowns of the case that Mueller made against Trump, cases of actual evidence necessary to fully indict and prosecute. Mueller didn't say there wasn't enough evidence to indict, he said it was the policy of the DOJ not to, and that includes it not being Barr's position to take a political stance either.

People owe it to themselves and this country to learn everything they can about what the report actually says, it is the only way anybody can be talking intelligently.

Anyone who has taken a position early on and refuses to engage in anything the report actually says is well beyond ignorance. I don't know what to say about anyone who argues the position that isn't basing arguments on what the report says, but what Barr, Trump, FOX, and right wing media sources. This is the issue where people can easily see and figure out who is lying to them, because it doesn't get better than being in black and white print.

Do you seriously believe Barr would jeopardize his own career and reputation?

Why don’t you have anything to say about Rosenstein being with Barr going over the report and helping formulate the conclusions drawn?

Why didn’t Mueller want to see the finished product by Barr having refused to do so on two separate occasions when Barr offered him the opportunity?

Why haven’t the Democrats that Barr offered to allow review the report but not being able to copy any of it and not leaking any of it, refuse his offer? The only reason they want the Unredacted report is to try to find something against Trump even at this late date...

The Mueller report is the proof of two distinct factions, on one side we have people who can see that obviously the report is long and heavily detailed, it can't possibly be read in a weekend.

Yet we have seen a narrative come out before the report was even released, Barr literally lied and misrepresented both what the report did in fact say, and put a spin to what it was saying that it did not. Of course right wing media and those in the GOP who have covered for Trump when they were in control of the house are running that narrative, nothing there, full exoneration, might as well burn it, we don't need it anymore.

Meanwhile, despite the narrative that people are s**k of this and want it over, books on the actual report and breakdowns of the case that Mueller made against Trump, cases of actual evidence necessary to fully indict and prosecute. Mueller didn't say there wasn't enough evidence to indict, he said it was the policy of the DOJ not to, and that includes it not being Barr's position to take a political stance either.

People owe it to themselves and this country to learn everything they can about what the report actually says, it is the only way anybody can be talking intelligently.

Anyone who has taken a position early on and refuses to engage in anything the report actually says is well beyond ignorance. I don't know what to say about anyone who argues the position that isn't basing arguments on what the report says, but what Barr, Trump, FOX, and right wing media sources. This is the issue where people can easily see and figure out who is lying to them, because it doesn't get better than being in black and white print.

Do you seriously believe Barr would jeopardize his own career and reputation?

Why don’t you have anything to say about Rosenstein being with Barr going over the report and helping formulate the conclusions drawn?

Why didn’t Mueller want to see the finished product by Barr having refused to do so on two separate occasions when Barr offered him the opportunity?

Why haven’t the Democrats that Barr offered to allow review the report but not being able to copy any of it and not leaking any of it, refuse his offer? The only reason they want the Unredacted report is to try to find something against Trump even at this late date...