The next big Democratic Idea: Expanding Supreme Court.. (Page 2): Obama nominated two far left judges. They only v**e with conservatives on things that do not affect the far left...

Liberty Tree

woodguru wrote:

How can you say that knowing that Obama did not nominate a far left judge? Dems are going to play it as close to the center as possible, you watch, and the GOP will fight even centrist judges just to oppose.

When was the last time a republican president ever came close to nominating a centrist judge?

Obama nominated two far left judges. They only v**e with conservatives on things that do not affect the far left agenda.

wolffy

woodguru wrote:

What's not said, and the right will never believe ... (show quote)

That's what they say now, but when they can, they will try to fill the seat with the most liberal l*****t judge they can find!!

snowbear37 Loc: MA.

proud republican wrote:

http://time.com/5550325/democrats-court-packing/

1. Expand the Supreme Court = get more hard left liberals on.

2, Allow 16 year old (kids) to v**e = liberal indoctrinated from grammar school.

3. Allow felons in jail to v**e = more liberal laws and less punishment.

4. Allow i*****l a***ns to v**e = more liberal v**es for entitlement programs and open borders.

Liberals want these people to v**e to ensure the liberal policies and agenda are achieved. The common thread is to dilute the number of responsible, conservative v**es.

TrueAmerican

woodguru wrote:

What's not said, and the right will never believe ... (show quote)

Riiggghhhttttt ha ha ha ha ha ha ignorant people say ignorant things !!!!!!

Seth

woodguru wrote:

What's not said, and the right will never believe ... (show quote)

Justices aren't supposed to be conservative, "liberal" OR centrist -- they're supposed to be guided by the letter of the Constitution.

You DO remember the Constitution, don't you?

Seth

Liberty Tree wrote:

Obama nominated two far left judges. They only v**e with conservatives on things that do not affect the far left agenda.

When I lived in North Carolina, the Democrats there were doing the same thing with judges.

The v**ers kept on electing letter-of-the-law conservatives to the bench, so the Dems kept expanding the number of judges...to no avail, LOL, because the v**ers didn't want to endure leftie legislators-from-the-bench.

The Democrats make a big stink about wanting "the people" to get what "the people" want, but if "the people" elect anyone the Dems don't want, their actions contradict their words as they attempt to nullify the will of "the people."

woodguru

proud republican wrote:

You guys dont want centrists,you want far left judges that will uphold your far,far left decisions...Anyways i dont think that this will ever happen...At least not in the next decade or so...

Do you want centrists? Do you want judges that have a long history of rulings and decisions that follow a well centered adherence to the law?

I'd be happy with a bench made up of 100% republicans as long as they have a long history of sticking to adhering to the law and precedence in terms of sentencing and decisions. We don't need judges that lean hard to either the left or the right.

proud republican Loc: RED CALIFORNIA

woodguru wrote:

Do you want centrists? Do you want judges that have a long history of rulings and decisions that follow a well centered adherence to the law?

I'd be happy with a bench made up of 100% republicans as long as they have a long history of sticking to adhering to the law and precedence in terms of sentencing and decisions. We don't need judges that lean hard to either the left or the right.

And yet that's exactly what you have at the 9th Circuit...

woodguru

Seth wrote:

Justices aren't supposed to be conservative, "liberal" OR centrist -- they're supposed to be guided by the letter of the Constitution.

You DO remember the Constitution, don't you?

The right leaning, the very notion that it is well accepted that they are hard leaning toward conservative values means that they are not well centered on the law, the constitution. If they were centrists they would not be ranked as leaning hard to the right.

A centrist judge is one who adheres to the rule of law, the constitution and what it is saying. Nobody is using a criteria for when judges are going with the constitution, although we have seen many cases where the hard right court has predictably ruled in favor of conservative values versus the constitution. The Scalia court made rulings that rank among the worst ever in the history of the court, they were bad and obviously drifted away from the constitution into ground that is called legislating from the bench. Of course the right sees opposing v**es to the right as liberal, not being capable of putting bias aside and understanding when bias rears it's ugly head.

woodguru

proud republican wrote:

And yet that's exactly what you have at the 9th Circuit...

Because they oppose Trump? A lot of people see 9th court challenges in cases that go before it as cases where Trump is correct to be challenged because he obviously is not adhering to the constitution. The right seems to think that if Trump does something it must be constitutional because the president can do wh**ever he wants.

This president has an ugly record in terms of refusing to listen to white house attorneys when they tell him he can't or shouldn't do something for reasons. So what is the result supposed to be when Trump defies white house counsel and is challenged by those who's job is actually to challenge executive oversight. He should be challenged and the courts should overrule his violations.

The EPA is doing things in a way that is ridiculous in terms of not doing things correctly, they should be opposed and courts should uphold these challenges.

Have you seen any single case where there are obviously violations or do you think this president should be able to do things regardless of legality?

woodguru

proud republican wrote:

And yet that's exactly what you have at the 9th Circuit...

I asked you if you wanted centrists, and you said that's what we have in the 9th.

77Reaganite Loc: Athens, GA, United States

proud republican wrote:

http://time.com/5550325/democrats-court-packing/

It's so they can an enact their socialistic Utopias on us by stuffing the courts because they can't pass it legislatively so they're going to pass it judiciously so that's why they need all these so-called activist judges so they can enact their game plan to destroy America that's what they want to do anyway they don't like the Constitution because it limits their powers on what they can do to us so they're going to try to skirt it every way they can but Trump is putting the stock to that because he's packing the court with his own judges so they better hope that Ruth Bader Ginsburg doesn't die because as soon as she does Trump get another Supreme Court nominee and that's the end of the socialistic tyrants and I know that that's why they're hell-bent on trying to stop him in 2020 but the crazy or that they're going to get the more they're going to push people over into the Trump campaign so good luck with that Democrats y'all done a real good job handing the president another term so good luck with that!

77Reaganite Loc: Athens, GA, United States

proud republican wrote:

http://time.com/5550325/democrats-court-packing/

Yeah they're going to have to stuff the courts because they can't pass anything legislatively because nobody wants their policies so they're going to try to force it on us whether we like it or not but good news Trump is stuff in the courts full of conservative judges so I'll tell the Democrats good luck with that! These people h**e the Constitution and since they can't win on their own merits and can't pass their own laws they have to use the courts in order to enact what they want us to do for them and other words they're going to try to make us servile through the courts

Seth

woodguru wrote:

Because they oppose Trump? A lot of people see 9th... (show quote)

The 9th Circus were the court that wanted G-d taken off our currency and out of the pledge of allegiance. They also have consistently ruled in favor of the farthest left "principles" known to man. They have been a dream come true for people like the ACLU and the SPLC.

Smedley_buzkill

woodguru wrote:

What's not said, and the right will never believe ... (show quote)

Any time a Liberal says Centrist they actually mean Left-wing activist.