For anyone confused...
Mar 19, 2019 19:26:41 #
SkptkSumthin wrote:
My concern is about stopping v**e f***d. That is very easy to understand, 'tho it
may be hard to accept.
may be hard to accept.
The effect of v***r f***d is quite minimal despite what the alt-right wants us to believe. Many of the initiatives that the alt-right promote to counter the minimal impact of what little v***r f***d actually does occur (much of it by accident), are primarily aimed at suppressing minority v**es, because they know that minorities tend to v**e Democratic. It is all about trying to rig the e******ns in favor of the Republicans.
Mar 19, 2019 21:30:35 #
Well, good: now your cards are on the table. Denying or minimizing the existence of
v***r f***d will not make the charge go away. The evidence is overwhelming.
Counties whose v**er rolls are 114% of eligible v**ers. Non citizens admitting they
registered and v**ed. E******n officials admitting they v**ed 4 times. The constant push to change the laws whose purpose was to minimize fraud, in order to make fraud easier to commit, and get away with (motor-v**er, e******n day registration, mail-in b****ts,
on-line v****g). And it's always Democrats behind it. No wonder they want to deny
it exists!
v***r f***d will not make the charge go away. The evidence is overwhelming.
Counties whose v**er rolls are 114% of eligible v**ers. Non citizens admitting they
registered and v**ed. E******n officials admitting they v**ed 4 times. The constant push to change the laws whose purpose was to minimize fraud, in order to make fraud easier to commit, and get away with (motor-v**er, e******n day registration, mail-in b****ts,
on-line v****g). And it's always Democrats behind it. No wonder they want to deny
it exists!
Mar 19, 2019 22:40:59 #
SkptkSumthin wrote:
Well, good: now your cards are on the table. Denyi... (show quote)
V**er rolls will always be greater than eligible v**ers numbers until you find a way to prevent deaths, dead people rarely have the courtesy to remove their names from the v**er rolls. Non-citizens registering and v****g, Please provide evidence of claim and perhaps we can figure out who may be responsible. I haven't seen any looking to change current laws to enable v***r f***d, have seen some trying to allow for v**er suppression but that isn't the same thing now is it? E******n officials v****g more than once, that will be problematic regardless what we do to try to prevent it. As for your claim that Democrats are behind it, that is only what your alt-right media tells you, they lie.
Mar 20, 2019 06:15:28 #
"V**er rolls will always be greater..." Which is why there is a law requiring counties to
periodically purge their v**er rolls of dead or otherwise inactive v**ers. But some counties
prefer not to go to much effort in that regard until sued by some good government group
like Judicial Watch, and then ordered by a judge. They like to keep those registrations
handy, just in case.
Here's a little something from Obama's second e******n, after which he could be more
flexible towards Putin:
https://www.wnd.com/2012/11/the-big-list-of-v**e-fraud-reports/
I've got a beauty saved from 2014, but I saved the article, not the link.
However, trouble though it may be, I will be happy to copy and paste it here.
Just ask.
As to only getting the information from "alt-right" sources, the Dem-supporting
mainstream media won't report it, so what do you expect? And they don't lie.
periodically purge their v**er rolls of dead or otherwise inactive v**ers. But some counties
prefer not to go to much effort in that regard until sued by some good government group
like Judicial Watch, and then ordered by a judge. They like to keep those registrations
handy, just in case.
Here's a little something from Obama's second e******n, after which he could be more
flexible towards Putin:
https://www.wnd.com/2012/11/the-big-list-of-v**e-fraud-reports/
I've got a beauty saved from 2014, but I saved the article, not the link.
However, trouble though it may be, I will be happy to copy and paste it here.
Just ask.
As to only getting the information from "alt-right" sources, the Dem-supporting
mainstream media won't report it, so what do you expect? And they don't lie.
Mar 20, 2019 11:04:40 #
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
The effect of v***r f***d is quite minimal despite what the alt-right wants us to believe. Many of the initiatives that the alt-right promote to counter the minimal impact of what little v***r f***d actually does occur (much of it by accident), are primarily aimed at suppressing minority v**es, because they know that minorities tend to v**e Democratic. It is all about trying to rig the e******ns in favor of the Republicans.
V***r f***d effect is only minimal to those who favor democrats. Real Americans want totally honest e******ns, ergo V**er ID. If you are against this, you are against t***h in e******ns and. Therefor a fraudulent American.
Mar 20, 2019 11:38:39 #
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
The effect of v***r f***d is quite minimal despite what the alt-right wants us to believe. Many of the initiatives that the alt-right promote to counter the minimal impact of what little v***r f***d actually does occur (much of it by accident), are primarily aimed at suppressing minority v**es, because they know that minorities tend to v**e Democratic. It is all about trying to rig the e******ns in favor of the Republicans.
"The effect of v***r f***d is quite minimal despite what the alt-right wants us to believe." - Common_Sense_Matters
Well surprise surprise, Common_Sense_Matters is against honest e******ns.
She says that getting honest v**e counts is "rigging" the e******ns.
Mar 20, 2019 11:51:23 #
SkptkSumthin wrote:
Well, good: now your cards are on the table. Denyi... (show quote)
THE BIG LIST of v**e f***d reports
108% of v****g population endorses Obama
Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2012/11/the-big-list-of-v**e-fraud-reports/#Wia8jRuHd0cra7qs.99
Mar 20, 2019 16:31:19 #
SkptkSumthin wrote:
"V**er rolls will always be greater..." ... (show quote)
Sorry, I don't do conspiracy theories, WND is so far alt-right, you can't believe a word they say, please provide something a bit more centered, a bit more legitimate.
As for your claim that MSM won't cover it due to their "bias", that is just hogwash, likely they won't cover it because it isn't factual. You don't think a right leaning "conservative" site would carry it if it were legit? If it only shows on alt-right sites, that is your first clue it is bogus, period.
Mar 20, 2019 16:33:07 #
eagleye13 wrote:
THE BIG LIST of v**e f***d reports
108% of v****g population endorses Obama
Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2012/11/the-big-list-of-v**e-fraud-reports/#Wia8jRuHd0cra7qs.99
108% of v****g population endorses Obama
Read more at https://www.wnd.com/2012/11/the-big-list-of-v**e-fraud-reports/#Wia8jRuHd0cra7qs.99
I have told you MANY times in the past, I don't do conspiracy theories, find a legitimate source that makes the same claim, I will read that source. Don't tell me there aren't any more centered right leaning sites, I know better than that.
Mar 20, 2019 16:35:18 #
eagleye13 wrote:
"The effect of v***r f***d is quite minimal despite what the alt-right wants us to believe." - Common_Sense_Matters
Well surprise surprise, Common_Sense_Matters is against honest e******ns.
She says that getting honest v**e counts is "rigging" the e******ns.
Well surprise surprise, Common_Sense_Matters is against honest e******ns.
She says that getting honest v**e counts is "rigging" the e******ns.
Well surprise, surprise, "eagleye" isn't any more above making false allegations than his alt-right media that he cherishes so. I am FOR HONEST e******ns, too bad Republicans aren't.
Edit: And no surprise, eagleye is too ignorant to get it through HER head that I am male.
Mar 21, 2019 00:44:50 #
I guess we're stuck in a confirmation bias tarpit. WND does very in-depth checking of
facts, but you're like my "progressive" sister, who refuses to read any "right-wing crap".
But of course, you are no doubt very proud of your openmindedness.
facts, but you're like my "progressive" sister, who refuses to read any "right-wing crap".
But of course, you are no doubt very proud of your openmindedness.
Mar 21, 2019 01:55:01 #
SkptkSumthin wrote:
I guess we're stuck in a confirmation bias tarpit. WND does very in-depth checking of
facts, but you're like my "progressive" sister, who refuses to read any "right-wing crap".
But of course, you are no doubt very proud of your openmindedness.
facts, but you're like my "progressive" sister, who refuses to read any "right-wing crap".
But of course, you are no doubt very proud of your openmindedness.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WorldNetDaily#Controversies
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/world-net-daily-wnd/
https://www.politifact.com/personalities/worldnetdaily/
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/2017/02/20/media-biasfact-check-makes-wnds-f**est-fact-checkers-list/
Found false:
https://www.factcheck.org/2018/11/h**e-crimes-hotline-headline-is-wrong/
https://www.factcheck.org/2012/12/no-government-401k-takeover/
https://www.factcheck.org/2009/11/homeland-security-adviser/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/kaganroo-court/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/morsi-you-in-court/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/david-wilkerson/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/hawaii-official-no-obama-birth-certificate/
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/catholic-school-statues/
Found mostly false:
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/chobani-ceo-importing-300-muslim-refugees-per-month/
Found Mostly true (does not mean true):
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/ben-carson-v**er-fraud/
Yeah, I don't think I would have much faith in a website with such low journalistic integrity.
Mar 21, 2019 02:38:26 #
You probably have more faith in WND than I have in Snopes.
Like I said, a confirmation bias tarpit.
What's your opinion if the Southern Poverty Law Center?
Like I said, a confirmation bias tarpit.
What's your opinion if the Southern Poverty Law Center?
Mar 21, 2019 02:59:36 #
SkptkSumthin wrote:
You probably have more faith in WND than I have in Snopes.
Like I said, a confirmation bias tarpit.
What's your opinion if the Southern Poverty Law Center?
Like I said, a confirmation bias tarpit.
What's your opinion if the Southern Poverty Law Center?
Haven't done research on it yet, but then I also haven't read any articles by SPLC either, probably because they are't a news site really. Pick one of the articles that Snopes fact checked that you think they improperly fact checked and I will do my own leg work and fact check their fact check, if I find they did a poor job, I will do the rest and perhaps change my mind.
Mar 21, 2019 03:24:06 #
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.