You don't need a behind the scenes advocate do you? But it would be hard going resurrecting the Tea Party, listening to Mark Meckler, I know he quit 2012 but he couldn't change, he quit because the Tea Party was designed to wash up the dishes, dirty cups and saucers after the Mad Hatters.

He's more retired than I am, if he ever went to work at all.

Nevertheless this could be the very first time, like a virgin touched by the struggle for the very first time, I recommend standing behind him never in front.

Eve did get Cain from the Lord * quote Contemporary English Version Genesis 4; 1-2.

Adam and Eve had a son. Then Eve said, "I'll name him Caine because I got him with the help of the Lord. Later she had another son and named him Able.
end quote.

So there is a certain amount of evidence to back your claims, but on the other hand the Lord was better fed with lamb rather than cereas and God praised Abel not Cain which could have been the mistake I was referring too and why the first born lambs became the Property of God in the form of Levites, this could be why the Pharisees began slaughtering them in the hope of getting rewarded by The Lord, I'm not sure and will investigate further.

Can't figure out where the niging Negroes come into it, but I suspect the Aliens had to do with it.

That's just like "YOU PEOPLE".I got that Lie from a Bible and you refute it in order to sustain your superiority.Haven't "YOU PEOPLE learned that we can use the word n****r any time we want,you on the hand are not even allowed to utter or write the first phonetic syllable of it- don't do it again
I don't, know about all that ambiguous jibberish you were relaying, I have always been given to understand Cain and Abel were flat out brothers,and that Cain k**led Abel out of a sibling rivalry no more no less.This was one of the many,many stories the Bible pervays in order to teach us about life and what we will encounter in it. in this case this was a lesson on envy,one of the six fatal sins. I don't know what that s**t was you were saying [ some of that"YOU PEOPLE " s**t I guess]

I don't know why you would refrain from calling black people n****rs,other than you are probably lying about that and"YOU PEOPLE" are massive ass ignorant hypocrites,you call and malign,and defame,and degrade,and degenerate, perjorisise, and Mame and murder, and pilfer them in every other conceivable way- by the way ,the term n****r has no mortal tangible physical value,no connotations ,it is strictly psychological,or spiritual,all the afforementioned demeanments carry mortal tangible physical consequences behind them.

Interesting you should bring that up. It seems that it is Republicans that want to have a government-issued v**er ID like most every other country in the civilized world, yet Democrats fight it. Why is that? It most certainly isn't r****t, it doesn't favor the rich, or exclude the poor, it doesn't vary by skin color or location and you take it with you when you go. You no longer need to worry about if you are still registered to v**e, or if you can v**e this year because you moved to close to e******n day, or if you forgot to cancel your v***r r**********n at an old address and someone is using your v**e there. It is no harder to get than an ID or Drivers license, and it assures the entire v****g public EVERY person gets 1 v**e regardless of race or income. The only people against it are politicians, why do you suppose that is? My Dad passed away 15 years ago since he has passed away I have repeatedly canceled his v***r r**********n, yet it keeps returning as a party he was never registered to. It would be so easy to turn in his card with his picture on it, and it is canceled permanently. On the off chance, I was of the mind to v**e his v**e my face wouldn't
match his picture so the card would be invalid. it is so simple.
Short video of W***e S*********ts explaining why we shouldn't have v**er ID, and the b****s who respond to their accusations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs

Interesting you should bring that up. It seems that it is Republicans that want to have a government-issued v**er ID like most every other country in the civilized world, yet Democrats fight it. Why is that? It most certainly isn't r****t, it doesn't favor the rich, or exclude the poor, it doesn't vary by skin color or location and you take it with you when you go. You no longer need to worry about if you are still registered to v**e, or if you can v**e this year because you moved to close to e******n day, or if you forgot to cancel your v***r r**********n at an old address and someone is using your v**e there. It is no harder to get than an ID or Drivers license, and it assures the entire v****g public EVERY person gets 1 v**e regardless of race or income. The only people against it are politicians, why do you suppose that is? My Dad passed away 15 years ago since he has passed away I have repeatedly canceled his v***r r**********n, yet it keeps returning as a party he was never registered to. It would be so easy to turn in his card with his picture on it, and it is canceled permanently. On the off chance, I was of the mind to v**e his v**e my face wouldn't
match his picture so the card would be invalid. it is so simple.
Short video of W***e S*********ts explaining why we shouldn't have v**er ID, and the b****s who respond to their accusations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs

Actually... Two of my dearest friends are black... Both from Africa (Ghana and Somaliland)... But you are correct... I have called b****s n****rs in the past and probably will in the future... Some individuals simply warrant the term...

I am actually stunned to find myself on agreement with your assessment of the term...
The term n****r is indeed a psychological construct... And has little true effect in the real world... Though the usage of it may indicate a prejudice or lack of education....

I am Canadian, of Scottish ancestory, and have no knowledge of any action I have personally undertaken that would in anyway "malign,and defame,and degrade,and degenerate, perjorize, and maim and murder, and pilfer " any individual of African decent... But perhaps I have unknowingly committed said actions... Such is life...

Interesting you should bring that up. It seems that it is Republicans that want to have a government-issued v**er ID like most every other country in the civilized world, yet Democrats fight it. Why is that? It most certainly isn't r****t, it doesn't favor the rich, or exclude the poor, it doesn't vary by skin color or location and you take it with you when you go. You no longer need to worry about if you are still registered to v**e, or if you can v**e this year because you moved to close to e******n day, or if you forgot to cancel your v***r r**********n at an old address and someone is using your v**e there. It is no harder to get than an ID or Drivers license, and it assures the entire v****g public EVERY person gets 1 v**e regardless of race or income. The only people against it are politicians, why do you suppose that is? My Dad passed away 15 years ago since he has passed away I have repeatedly canceled his v***r r**********n, yet it keeps returning as a party he was never registered to. It would be so easy to turn in his card with his picture on it, and it is canceled permanently. On the off chance, I was of the mind to v**e his v**e my face wouldn't
match his picture so the card would be invalid. it is so simple.
Short video of W***e S*********ts explaining why we shouldn't have v**er ID, and the b****s who respond to their accusations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs

What always gives me a grin about conservatives is that they are so ashamed of their own history that they will adopt liberal ideals and actions as their own all while denouncing what would be typical conservative behavior of the time. In today's conservatives mind, they are the abolitionists all while not understanding that as conservatives--by definition--they are tasked to maintaining status quo thus would be the Southern plantation owner--or siding with such--who were in a fight for their way of life.

JW and I got in this very debate several weeks ago where he took the position that historically conservatives were the ones who were progressive and were responsible for pushing for change throughout the history of this country. According to JW, conservatives thumbed your noses as status quo--at tradition--and instead stood up for change whether in the creation of this country, the civil war and freeing of the s***es, standing against Jim Crow laws, standing FOR workers rights and child labor laws. Standing for women's rights etc, etc, etc.

Now I understand why JW is taking the position that he is taking--if he didn't then he would have to admit that historically conservatives were the r****ts and the bigots...and the ones who were trying to maintain r****m and bigotry as a tradition in this country then...and today.

And as our countries number one bigot likes to say...that's just sad...