One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
For anyone confused...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next>>
Mar 15, 2019 22:12:48   #
Sicilianthing (suspended)
 
RT friend wrote:
You don't need a behind the scenes advocate do you? But it would be hard going resurrecting the Tea Party, listening to Mark Meckler, I know he quit 2012 but he couldn't change, he quit because the Tea Party was designed to wash up the dishes, dirty cups and saucers after the Mad Hatters.

He's more retired than I am, if he ever went to work at all.

Nevertheless this could be the very first time, like a virgin touched by the struggle for the very first time, I recommend standing behind him never in front.
You don't need a behind the scenes advocate do you... (show quote)


>>>

I dont care about the T party or Mark anymore we’ve all moved onto Plans B, C and D

God Help you all.

| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 22:44:49   #
dongreen76
 
RT friend wrote:
Eve did get Cain from the Lord * quote Contemporary English Version Genesis 4; 1-2.

Adam and Eve had a son. Then Eve said, "I'll name him Caine because I got him with the help of the Lord. Later she had another son and named him Able.
end quote.

So there is a certain amount of evidence to back your claims, but on the other hand the Lord was better fed with lamb rather than cereas and God praised Abel not Cain which could have been the mistake I was referring too and why the first born lambs became the Property of God in the form of Levites, this could be why the Pharisees began slaughtering them in the hope of getting rewarded by The Lord, I'm not sure and will investigate further.

Can't figure out where the niging Negroes come into it, but I suspect the Aliens had to do with it.

Eve did get Cain from the Lord * quote Contemporar... (show quote)


That's just like "YOU PEOPLE".I got that Lie from a Bible and you refute it in order to sustain your superiority.Haven't "YOU PEOPLE learned that we can use the word nigger any time we want,you on the hand are not even allowed to utter or write the first phonetic syllable of it- don't do it again
I don't, know about all that ambiguous jibberish you were relaying, I have always been given to understand Cain and Abel were flat out brothers,and that Cain killed Abel out of a sibling rivalry no more no less.This was one of the many,many stories the Bible pervays in order to teach us about life and what we will encounter in it. in this case this was a lesson on envy,one of the six fatal sins. I don't know what that shit was you were saying [ some of that"YOU PEOPLE " shit I guess]

| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 23:00:45   #
Canuckus Deploracus (a regular here)
 
con-green76 wrote:
That's just like "YOU PEOPLE".I got that Lie from a Bible and you refute it in order to sustain your superiority.Haven't "YOU PEOPLE learned that we can use the word nigger any time we want,you on the hand are not even allowed to utter or write the first phonetic syllable of it- don't do it again
I don't, know about all that ambiguous jibberish you were relaying, I have always been given to understand Cain and Abel were flat out brothers,and that Cain killed Abel out of a sibling rivalry no more no less.This was one of the many,many stories the Bible pervays in order to teach us about life and what we will encounter in it. in this case this was a lesson on envy,one of the six fatal sins. I don't know what that shit was you were saying [ some of that"YOU PEOPLE " shit I guess]
That's just like "YOU PEOPLE".I got that... (show quote)


Anyone can use the word nigger if they want to... It's not the most polite of terms and I would certainly refrain from calling most Blacks niggers, but it is illogical and Idiotic to claim that one group can use it and another can't...

Careful Con...

| Reply
Mar 16, 2019 00:22:52   #
RT friend (a regular here)
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

I dont care about the T party or Mark anymore we’ve all moved onto Plans B, C and D

God Help you all.


I was bit worried about Mark, I didn't think he was it, but thanks for pointing that out, a good radical Article 5 Convention proposition could come from someone who thinks along the lines of Jake Morphonious, never heard him mention any Amendments but his ideas are futuristic.

| Reply
Mar 16, 2019 04:47:38   #
dongreen76
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Anyone can use the word nigger if they want to... It's not the most polite of terms and I would certainly refrain from calling most Blacks niggers, but it is illogical and Idiotic to claim that one group can use it and another can't...

Careful Con...


I don't know why you would refrain from calling black people niggers,other than you are probably lying about that and"YOU PEOPLE" are massive ass ignorant hypocrites,you call and malign,and defame,and degrade,and degenerate, perjorisise, and Mame and murder, and pilfer them in every other conceivable way- by the way ,the term nigger has no mortal tangible physical value,no connotations ,it is strictly psychological,or spiritual,all the afforementioned demeanments carry mortal tangible physical consequences behind them.

| Reply
Mar 16, 2019 05:15:13   #
Canuckus Deploracus (a regular here)
 
con-green76 wrote:
I don't know why you would refrain from calling black people niggers,other than you are probably lying about that and"YOU PEOPLE" are massive ass ignorant hypocrites,you call and malign,and defame,and degrade,and degenerate, perjorisise, and Mame and murder, and pilfer them in every other conceivable way- by the way ,the term nigger has no mortal tangible physical value,no connotations ,it is strictly psychological,or spiritual,all the afforementioned demeanments carry mortal tangible physical consequences behind them.
I don't know why you would refrain from calling bl... (show quote)


Actually... Two of my dearest friends are black... Both from Africa (Ghana and Somaliland)... But you are correct... I have called blacks niggers in the past and probably will in the future... Some individuals simply warrant the term...

I am actually stunned to find myself on agreement with your assessment of the term...
The term nigger is indeed a psychological construct... And has little true effect in the real world... Though the usage of it may indicate a prejudice or lack of education....

I am Canadian, of Scottish ancestory, and have no knowledge of any action I have personally undertaken that would in anyway "malign,and defame,and degrade,and degenerate, perjorize, and maim and murder, and pilfer " any individual of African decent... But perhaps I have unknowingly committed said actions... Such is life...

| Reply
Mar 16, 2019 05:53:52   #
WhoToldYouTothinkThat
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Voter_caging


Interesting you should bring that up. It seems that it is Republicans that want to have a government-issued voter ID like most every other country in the civilized world, yet Democrats fight it. Why is that? It most certainly isn't racist, it doesn't favor the rich, or exclude the poor, it doesn't vary by skin color or location and you take it with you when you go. You no longer need to worry about if you are still registered to vote, or if you can vote this year because you moved to close to election day, or if you forgot to cancel your voter registration at an old address and someone is using your vote there. It is no harder to get than an ID or Drivers license, and it assures the entire voting public EVERY person gets 1 vote regardless of race or income. The only people against it are politicians, why do you suppose that is? My Dad passed away 15 years ago since he has passed away I have repeatedly canceled his voter registration, yet it keeps returning as a party he was never registered to. It would be so easy to turn in his card with his picture on it, and it is canceled permanently. On the off chance, I was of the mind to vote his vote my face wouldn't
match his picture so the card would be invalid. it is so simple.
Short video of White Supremacists explaining why we shouldn't have voter ID, and the blacks who respond to their accusations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs

| Reply
Mar 16, 2019 07:08:22   #
bylm1-Bernie (a regular here)
 
WhoToldYouTothinkThat wrote:
Interesting you should bring that up. It seems that it is Republicans that want to have a government-issued voter ID like most every other country in the civilized world, yet Democrats fight it. Why is that? It most certainly isn't racist, it doesn't favor the rich, or exclude the poor, it doesn't vary by skin color or location and you take it with you when you go. You no longer need to worry about if you are still registered to vote, or if you can vote this year because you moved to close to election day, or if you forgot to cancel your voter registration at an old address and someone is using your vote there. It is no harder to get than an ID or Drivers license, and it assures the entire voting public EVERY person gets 1 vote regardless of race or income. The only people against it are politicians, why do you suppose that is? My Dad passed away 15 years ago since he has passed away I have repeatedly canceled his voter registration, yet it keeps returning as a party he was never registered to. It would be so easy to turn in his card with his picture on it, and it is canceled permanently. On the off chance, I was of the mind to vote his vote my face wouldn't
match his picture so the card would be invalid. it is so simple.
Short video of White Supremacists explaining why we shouldn't have voter ID, and the blacks who respond to their accusations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs
Interesting you should bring that up. It seems tha... (show quote)



Welcome to the club, Who! I have always thought that this lame excuse that liberals give against voter ID laws was probably the weakest one they could come up with. The video shows all blacks interviewed had no trouble with it and all whites thought the law was racist. The blacks were apparently interviewed on a city street in New York and the whites were all students on a college campus. This begs the question, where did the students get their information. It seem pretty obvious to me - College professors. Don't think that this is the only wrong information disseminated by college professors. I think it's time we opened our eyes.

| Reply
Mar 16, 2019 09:43:29   #
4430 (a regular here)
 
WhoToldYouTothinkThat wrote:
Interesting you should bring that up. It seems that it is Republicans that want to have a government-issued voter ID like most every other country in the civilized world, yet Democrats fight it. Why is that? It most certainly isn't racist, it doesn't favor the rich, or exclude the poor, it doesn't vary by skin color or location and you take it with you when you go. You no longer need to worry about if you are still registered to vote, or if you can vote this year because you moved to close to election day, or if you forgot to cancel your voter registration at an old address and someone is using your vote there. It is no harder to get than an ID or Drivers license, and it assures the entire voting public EVERY person gets 1 vote regardless of race or income. The only people against it are politicians, why do you suppose that is? My Dad passed away 15 years ago since he has passed away I have repeatedly canceled his voter registration, yet it keeps returning as a party he was never registered to. It would be so easy to turn in his card with his picture on it, and it is canceled permanently. On the off chance, I was of the mind to vote his vote my face wouldn't
match his picture so the card would be invalid. it is so simple.
Short video of White Supremacists explaining why we shouldn't have voter ID, and the blacks who respond to their accusations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs
Interesting you should bring that up. It seems tha... (show quote)


It all boils down to the fact that the Democrats abhor Voter ID WHY it makes voter fraud much harder and Voter fraud is how they have a much better chance of winning !

| Reply
Mar 16, 2019 10:40:38   #
Sicilianthing (suspended)
 
RT friend wrote:
I was bit worried about Mark, I didn't think he was it, but thanks for pointing that out, a good radical Article 5 Convention proposition could come from someone who thinks along the lines of Jake Morphonious, never heard him mention any Amendments but his ideas are futuristic.


>>>

We’ll see.

| Reply
Mar 16, 2019 12:39:37   #
RT friend (a regular here)
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

We’ll see.


I'm betting he'll mention the issue shortly. We'll see.

| Reply
Mar 16, 2019 12:54:58   #
dongreen76
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Actually... Two of my dearest friends are black... Both from Africa (Ghana and Somaliland)... But you are correct... I have called blacks niggers in the past and probably will in the future... Some individuals simply warrant the term...

I am actually stunned to find myself on agreement with your assessment of the term...
The term nigger is indeed a psychological construct... And has little true effect in the real world... Though the usage of it may indicate a prejudice or lack of education....

I am Canadian, of Scottish ancestory, and have no knowledge of any action I have personally undertaken that would in anyway "malign,and defame,and degrade,and degenerate, perjorize, and maim and murder, and pilfer " any individual of African decent... But perhaps I have unknowingly committed said actions... Such is life...
Actually... Two of my dearest friends are black...... (show quote)

There you go with some of that "YOU PEOPLE'S" some of my best friends are black cliche-ish shit again.they are not sincerely your friends,because on the down low,you are contemptuous of them as negroes,you think of them as Niggers,something lower than your self-end result ;you are -amongst many other perjoritive things -you are a Hypocrite.


Ghana ! One of the countries in which slavery was an intergral part of their economy.
Some people warrant being called Honkey ! more so than a black being called a nigger.I think more so . After all ,"YOU PEOPLE" and your gender and race related dysphoria have reaped more havoc on the other 83% of the world under the guise of spiritual morality than God did gallons of water when he flooded the world.....BOTH TIMES !!!

| Reply
Mar 16, 2019 18:50:19   #
Common_Sense_Matters (a regular here)
 
WhoToldYouTothinkThat wrote:
Interesting you should bring that up. It seems that it is Republicans that want to have a government-issued voter ID like most every other country in the civilized world, yet Democrats fight it. Why is that? It most certainly isn't racist, it doesn't favor the rich, or exclude the poor, it doesn't vary by skin color or location and you take it with you when you go. You no longer need to worry about if you are still registered to vote, or if you can vote this year because you moved to close to election day, or if you forgot to cancel your voter registration at an old address and someone is using your vote there. It is no harder to get than an ID or Drivers license, and it assures the entire voting public EVERY person gets 1 vote regardless of race or income. The only people against it are politicians, why do you suppose that is? My Dad passed away 15 years ago since he has passed away I have repeatedly canceled his voter registration, yet it keeps returning as a party he was never registered to. It would be so easy to turn in his card with his picture on it, and it is canceled permanently. On the off chance, I was of the mind to vote his vote my face wouldn't
match his picture so the card would be invalid. it is so simple.
Short video of White Supremacists explaining why we shouldn't have voter ID, and the blacks who respond to their accusations. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rrBxZGWCdgs
Interesting you should bring that up. It seems tha... (show quote)


I would have to examine the bill they created to be certain of ALL the facts. Some of your assertions are incorrect though, first one being that you would still have to change your address with your voter registration with the card as well as without it, many elections such as congress and local government positions rely on districts, to not have to verify that you still reside in the district you are registered with the elections would be no more valid with the card as without. I do like the photo requirements but as for the likely fee attached to such a card may lead some that live by meager means to opt out of the very crucial voting process due to the expense even if minimal. As for locations, those living on reservations do not have an official address, they pick their mail up at the post office for the reservation, what shall they use as their address? Also, how will these voter cards prevent voter caging?

As I implied earlier in this post, I have not examined the bill for the voter I.D., perhaps it may cover some of the concerns, but I doubt it will alleviate all of my concerns. One way we could "manage" the fee portion, have the "registered voter" indication added to state issued I.D./Drivers license for no additional fee.

| Reply
Mar 17, 2019 10:21:22   #
JW (a regular here)
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Your statement I find somewhat confusing but I agree with what I believe you are saying. A few extremists claim to be Muslim and they are reading the Quran, just not as it was meant to be interpreted, and they paint the whole religion as bad. Is this "Christchurch Mosque" a Christian church or an Islamic church? Muslims don't believe in Jesus Christ as a messiah but I haven't heard of Christian churches being called a mosque either.


They are reading it exactly as it was meant to be understood. Mohammed was a warlord who fashioned a religion to provide an unending supply of soldiers.

Christchurch is a major city in New Zealand.

I really wish you people would do some historical research before succumbing to modern propaganda.

| Reply
Mar 17, 2019 10:38:39   #
eagleye13 (a regular here)
 
PeterS wrote:
What always gives me a grin about conservatives is that they are so ashamed of their own history that they will adopt liberal ideals and actions as their own all while denouncing what would be typical conservative behavior of the time. In today's conservatives mind, they are the abolitionists all while not understanding that as conservatives--by definition--they are tasked to maintaining status quo thus would be the Southern plantation owner--or siding with such--who were in a fight for their way of life.

JW and I got in this very debate several weeks ago where he took the position that historically conservatives were the ones who were progressive and were responsible for pushing for change throughout the history of this country. According to JW, conservatives thumbed your noses as status quo--at tradition--and instead stood up for change whether in the creation of this country, the civil war and freeing of the slaves, standing against Jim Crow laws, standing FOR workers rights and child labor laws. Standing for women's rights etc, etc, etc.

Now I understand why JW is taking the position that he is taking--if he didn't then he would have to admit that historically conservatives were the racists and the bigots...and the ones who were trying to maintain racism and bigotry as a tradition in this country then...and today.

And as our countries number one bigot likes to say...that's just sad...
What always gives me a grin about conservatives is... (show quote)


https://static.onepoliticalplaza.com/upload/2019/3/14/t1-46099-for_anyone_confused....jpg

Liar Liar Pants On Fire Hillary Song
https://youtu.be/kXjbXGyQDsE

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 ... 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.