One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
For anyone confused...
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next>>
Mar 15, 2019 11:59:27   #
Rose42 (a regular here)
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
God is the God of love...
We are not comnanded to be like Him, but to love Him...
If He wished us to be as Him, then we would be as Him...
He created us imperfectly for a reason..
Avoidance of sin and awareness of sin are fine... Hatred is not...


The God of Christianity is not the god of Islam. You may be correct concerning Islam but you are not with regards to Christianity.

Ephesians 5:1-2
Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children; and walk in love, just as Christ also loved you and gave Himself up for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God as a fragrant aroma.

1 Corinthians 11 -
Be imitators of me, just as I also am of Christ.

| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 12:10:39   #
Bcon (a regular here)
 
JW wrote:
The only one confused, Pete, is you... if historical revisionism can be called confusion.

The fact is, Lincoln was a Republican, Booth was a Democrat. It was Republicans who attempted to end slavery. It was Republicans who stopped its spread.

The KKK was an arm of the Democrat Party. I believe is was Strom Thurmond who said that it was not possible for person to be elected to the Democrat caucus in Washington unless he was a member of the KKK. Bill Clinton, in honoring him, stated the same except he said it was also a requirement for dog catcher, that to be elected to anything as a Democrat in those days, one had to be a member in good standing of the KKK. He is noted for making the longest filibuster in Congressional history. In 1957, he spoke for 24 hours and 18 minutes, expounding on the dangers of the Communist Civil Rights movement and the damage it was doing to the country. He remained a member of the KKK until he switched parties in 1964. If it is true that his membership in the KKK was nothing more than a pragmatic act, his switching parties would have been the same, an act of political convenience.

All the way up to LBJ, Democrats fought equality legislation for African-Americans.

The Liberal/Conservative fiction the Left has concocted in order to subvert the facts of history is as phony as everything else the Left pretends to believe in. Like Thurmond, Wallace and LBJ, whatever is convenient must be best answer.
The only one confused, Pete, is you... if historic... (show quote)


Thank you for trying to open a closed mind. There is so many on the left that have to be actually ashamed of their parties past that they do everything to try to reverse the
histories of the liberal and conservstive parties. From before the civil war, through reconstruction, well into the twentieth century, up until the Kennedy years, the democrats were for holding the black man down and for turning the government to socialistic principles. Their denying the facts only proves their lying philosophy.

| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 12:13:35   #
Bcon (a regular here)
 


I am sure these were all liberal ideas to write revisionist history. It must be hell for liberals to try so hard to live down their past that they will do and write anything to change the facts.

| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 12:39:16   #
Rose42 (a regular here)
 
bylm1-Bernie wrote:
Makes sense, CD! I was just reading Romans 12:9 where Paul says, "Hate what is evil." Sometimes I think I don't hate it enough. Bernie


We can't hate evil enough. Remember Christ endured the wrath of God for all our sins. It is Satan who doesn't want us to hate sin. Remember, his attacks can be subtle - a little giving here, some word twisting there, and on and on it goes.

| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 12:53:09   #
4430 (a regular here)
 
Common_Sense_Matters wrote:
Interesting, then how is it that prior to the switch, Democrats held the south and Republicans held the north and around the 60's it did a full 180?


When the Democrats saw that they were losing they went into full liberal mode and put in place programs to convince the Blacks that they were victims and they the Democrat party were in it for them !

LBJ put the finishing touches to that idea and made the statement that Quote I'll have the niggers voting Democrat for the next 200 yrs

Fact the Democrats have been very successful with this ploy !

This is why the majority of Blacks always voted Democrat , however that has been changing somewhat now a days !

| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 12:56:27   #
4430 (a regular here)
 
Bcon wrote:
I am sure these were all liberal ideas to write revisionist history. It must be hell for liberals to try so hard to live down their past that they will do and write anything to change the facts.


They've been trying to rewrite or remove History for yrs !

One only has to look no further than right now at all the Civil War Monuments being defaced and removed from the public arena

| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 14:51:35   #
dongreen76 (a regular here)
 
JW wrote:
The only one confused, Pete, is you... if historical revisionism can be called confusion.

The fact is, Lincoln was a Republican, Booth was a Democrat. It was Republicans who attempted to end slavery. It was Republicans who stopped its spread.

The KKK was an arm of the Democrat Party. I believe is was Strom Thurmond who said that it was not possible for person to be elected to the Democrat caucus in Washington unless he was a member of the KKK. Bill Clinton, in honoring him, stated the same except he said it was also a requirement for dog catcher, that to be elected to anything as a Democrat in those days, one had to be a member in good standing of the KKK. He is noted for making the longest filibuster in Congressional history. In 1957, he spoke for 24 hours and 18 minutes, expounding on the dangers of the Communist Civil Rights movement and the damage it was doing to the country. He remained a member of the KKK until he switched parties in 1964. If it is true that his membership in the KKK was nothing more than a pragmatic act, his switching parties would have been the same, an act of political convenience.

All the way up to LBJ, Democrats fought equality legislation for African-Americans.

The Liberal/Conservative fiction the Left has concocted in order to subvert the facts of history is as phony as everything else the Left pretends to believe in. Like Thurmond, Wallace and LBJ, whatever is convenient must be best answer.
The only one confused, Pete, is you... if historic... (show quote)


It is topsy tervy now,has been for decades.

| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 14:53:56   #
dongreen76 (a regular here)
 
PeterS wrote:
What always gives me a grin about conservatives is that they are so ashamed of their own history that they will adopt liberal ideals and actions as their own all while denouncing what would be typical conservative behavior of the time. In today's conservatives mind, they are the abolitionists all while not understanding that as conservatives--by definition--they are tasked to maintaining status quo thus would be the Southern plantation owner--or siding with such--who were in a fight for their way of life.

JW and I got in this very debate several weeks ago where he took the position that historically conservatives were the ones who were progressive and were responsible for pushing for change throughout the history of this country. According to JW, conservatives thumbed your noses as status quo--at tradition--and instead stood up for change whether in the creation of this country, the civil war and freeing of the slaves, standing against Jim Crow laws, standing FOR workers rights and child labor laws. Standing for women's rights etc, etc, etc.

Now I understand why JW is taking the position that he is taking--if he didn't then he would have to admit that historically conservatives were the racists and the bigots...and the ones who were trying to maintain racism and bigotry as a tradition in this country then...and today.

And as our countries number one bigot likes to say...that's just sad...
What always gives me a grin about conservatives is... (show quote)


The Democrats are the party of progressive liberalism now.

| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 15:31:18   #
dongreen76 (a regular here)
 
4430 wrote:
When the Democrats saw that they were losing they went into full liberal mode and put in place programs to convince the Blacks that they were victims and they the Democrat party were in it for them !

LBJ put the finishing touches to that idea and made the statement that Quote I'll have the niggers voting Democrat for the next 200 yrs

Fact the Democrats have been very successful with this ploy !

This is why the majority of Blacks always voted Democrat , however that has been changing somewhat now a days !
When the Democrats saw that they were losing they ... (show quote)


Once again 'YOU PEOPLE" have it assed backward when discussing blacks.Through John Kennedy's appreciation is the reason blacks primarily started voting Democrat .Black people played a key role in Kennedy's survival of his PT - 109 crisis.Kennedy was grateful, hence,he lend in ear when no other president would concerning blacks civilrights movement ;there was animous between LBJ and JFK .Kennedy chose LBJ as his running mate in order to appease the half of the Democratic party that was the dirty South.It is said that if a president through no fault of his own ,can't finish out his term,the vice president whom succedes him should carry out the man he succedes aspirations and policies; though a southerner,the policies he implemented we're Kennedy's ideas, a northerner ;these ideas we're congruent with blacks quest for equality .Common sense would dictate that blacks would vote for the party whom politiked in their interest.

| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 15:58:01   #
RT friend (a regular here)
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

Right ON !

Payback is going to become popular, works both ways, it’s called WAR


Hate certainly is the strongest emotion, second place is infatuation, personally I think God departed perfection because of infatuation with achievement, what happened after that was the rollercoaster ride of reality, but it didn't matter much because there was no flesh and blood.

After that what happened was, well let me think, I don't want to be accused of making it all up.

Ahh, ! I remembers now, what happened was, Fate Space and God were bored with reality just being nothing really so they conjured up a Prophet Particle that ended up actually doubling down on hate, it wasn't His fault the problum was there were two Fates together the old and the new, the new was deceived due to infatuation with perfection, the old knew very well it was BS.

Anyhow the new went missing and was misrepresented as the First Sin.

However really it was just a mistake.



| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 15:59:38   #
Canuckus Deploracus (a regular here)
 
Rose42 wrote:
The God of Christianity is not the god of Islam. You may be correct concerning Islam but you are not with regards to Christianity.

Ephesians 5:1-2
Therefore be imitators of God, as beloved children; and walk in love, just as Christ also loved you and gave Himself up for us, an offering and a sacrifice to God as a fragrant aroma.

1 Corinthians 11 -
Be imitators of me, just as I also am of Christ.


Where did Islam enter the equation?

| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 16:16:16   #
Sicilianthing (suspended)
 
RT friend wrote:
Hate certainly is the strongest emotion, second place is infatuation, personally I think God departed perfection because of infatuation with achievement, what happened after that was the rollercoaster ride of reality, but it didn't matter much because there was no flesh and blood.

After that what happened was, well let me think, I don't want to be accused of making it all up.

Ahh, ! I remembers now, what happened was, Fate Space and God were bored with reality just being nothing really so they conjured up a Prophet Particle that ended up actually doubling down on hate, it wasn't His fault the problum was there were two Fates together the old and the new, the new was deceived due to infatuation with perfection, the old knew very well it was BS.

Anyhow the new went missing and was misrepresented as the First Sin.

However really it was just a mistake.
Hate certainly is the strongest emotion, second pl... (show quote)


>>>

I guess and I really dont care anymore.
Jesus, God and the Bible Thumpers are going to do whatever they’re going to do.

The rest of the world who aren’t that or care about that simply dont care so you have to deal with them on a different level.

Leave that heavy lifting to guys like me and dont get in the way !

| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 16:36:37   #
dongreen76 (a regular here)
 
RT friend wrote:
Hate certainly is the strongest emotion, second place is infatuation, personally I think God departed perfection because of infatuation with achievement, what happened after that was the rollercoaster ride of reality, but it didn't matter much because there was no flesh and blood.

After that what happened was, well let me think, I don't want to be accused of making it all up.

Ahh, ! I remembers now, what happened was, Fate Space and God were bored with reality just being nothing really so they conjured up a Prophet Particle that ended up actually doubling down on hate, it wasn't His fault the problum was there were two Fates together the old and the new, the new was deceived due to infatuation with perfection, the old knew very well it was BS.

Anyhow the new went missing and was misrepresented as the First Sin.

However really it was just a mistake.
Hate certainly is the strongest emotion, second pl... (show quote)


You are grossly confused as to whom was the villain of the brothers,Cain & Abel
God assigned Cain and Abel respective task.Cain did his task and did it well.Abel on the other hand didn't do his so well.
God commended and praised Cain.
Abel, reacted to God's praise of Cain in a trifling malicious and perpetually caustic overbearing way[much like nignig Negroes behave today] out of frustration at Abels sordid attitude toward him - out of frustration ,Cain rose up and slew Abel.According to the passage in the Bible that immediately comes after the telling of Cain and Abel,the response of the Lord's was not that of dissapointment

| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 21:35:02   #
RT friend (a regular here)
 
dongreen76 wrote:
You are grossly confused as to whom was the villain of the brothers,Cain & Abel
God assigned Cain and Abel respective task.Cain did his task and did it well.Abel on the other hand didn't do his so well.
God commended and praised Cain.
Abel, reacted to God's praise of Cain in a trifling malicious and perpetually caustic overbearing way[much like nignig Negroes behave today] out of frustration at Abels sordid attitude toward him - out of frustration ,Cain rose up and slew Abel.According to the passage in the Bible that immediately comes after the telling of Cain and Abel,the response of the Lord's was not that of dissapointment
You are grossly confused as to whom was the villai... (show quote)

Eve did get Cain from the Lord * quote Contemporary English Version Genesis 4; 1-2.

Adam and Eve had a son. Then Eve said, "I'll name him Caine because I got him with the help of the Lord. Later she had another son and named him Able.
end quote.

So there is a certain amount of evidence to back your claims, but on the other hand the Lord was better fed with lamb rather than cereas and God praised Abel not Cain which could have been the mistake I was referring too and why the first born lambs became the Property of God in the form of Levites, this could be why the Pharisees began slaughtering them in the hope of getting rewarded by The Lord, I'm not sure and will investigate further.

Can't figure out where the niging Negroes come into it, but I suspect the Aliens had to do with it.


| Reply
Mar 15, 2019 21:50:39   #
RT friend (a regular here)
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

I guess and I really dont care anymore.
Jesus, God and the Bible Thumpers are going to do whatever they’re going to do.

The rest of the world who aren’t that or care about that simply dont care so you have to deal with them on a different level.

Leave that heavy lifting to guys like me and dont get in the way !


You don't need a behind the scenes advocate do you? But it would be hard going resurrecting the Tea Party, listening to Mark Meckler, I know he quit 2012 but he couldn't change, he quit because the Tea Party was designed to wash up the dishes, dirty cups and saucers after the Mad Hatters.

He's more retired than I am, if he ever went to work at all.

Nevertheless this could be the very first time, like a virgin touched by the struggle for the very first time, I recommend standing behind him never in front.

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.