One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
White Prviledge:
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
Mar 12, 2019 13:41:54   #
eagleye13 (a regular here)
 
TommyRadd wrote:
Thomas Sowell Uses Fact About Firstborn Children To Crush Liberal Lies on Discrimination

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/thomas-sowell-uses-fact-firstborn-children-crush-liberal-lies-discrimination/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=newsletter-CT&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=conservative-tribune

“In the first chapter of this book, I point out that the firstborn has higher IQs than his siblings and (in) later life has more achievements. Among astronauts, for example, of the 29 astronauts in the Apollo program that put a man on the moon, 22 were either the firstborn or an only child.
“Now, if you can’t get equality among people born to the same parents and raised under the same roof, why in the world do you think you’re going to get it among people who’ve had such different histories and cultures around the world?”
-Thomas Sowell

“Equality” is a leftist replacement for the actual good fight against evil.

What is evil? First and foremost is big government control, the most murderous enterprises by FAR in the last century. Next, murdering innocent living unborn babies, the most murderous enterprise in America by far. Hmmm, both these evils are things that leftists claim as “solutions”. See the pattern and contrast?

No wonder they want to demonize things that are neither good nor bad in and of themselves. We are all born with inequalities, what we do with what we have is what shows our character, simple as that. Our inherent inequalities aren’t in and of themselves evil, rather, they are the heart and soul of diversity, rather, variety is the spice of life. If we were all meant to be “equal” we would all look, act, and speak exactly the same. Is that really what “good” is supposed to look like? In other words, leftists are the true bigots who won’t allow people to be different, think different or speak differently than them. And the reason is because they love what is truly evil but won’t admit it, so they invent false forms of “values” (ie equality vs inequality) to ease their guilty consciences. Then project those false values upon others so they can feel good about their rejection of what is truly good and fool themselves into thinking they are fighting the good fight when in fact they are doing the opposite. It is thus, to them, just another false “religion” that covers up and justifies one’s sins, rather than purges one of their sins. In this way they placate their guilty consciences without actually turning toward the good.


“1Now indeed even the first covenant had ordinances of divine service, and an earthly sanctuary...
“8The Holy Spirit is indicating this, that the way into the Holy Place wasn't yet revealed while the first tabernacle was still standing; 9which is a symbol of the present age, where gifts and sacrifices are offered that are incapable, concerning the conscience, of making the worshipper perfect...
“13For if the blood of goats and bulls, and the ashes of a heifer sprinkling those who have been defiled, sanctify to the cleanness of the flesh: 14how much more will the blood of Christ, who through the eternal Spirit offered himself without blemish to God, cleanse your conscience from dead works to serve the living God?” Hebrew 9:1-14
Thomas Sowell Uses Fact About Firstborn Children T... (show quote)


"Thomas Sowell Uses Fact About Firstborn Children To Crush Liberal Lies on Discrimination"

https://www.westernjournal.com/ct/thomas-sowell-uses-fact-firstborn-children-crush-liberal-lies-discrimination/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=newsletter-CT&utm_campaign=dailypm&utm_content=conservative-tribune


IMO; Thomas Sowell is one intelligent journalist.
He makes so many good points;

Whenever you need some sanity, a dose of Thomas Sowell can sometimes be what the doctor ordered.

The venerable conservative economist and pundit was appearing on Fox Business Network on Tuesday in part to discuss his book “Discrimination and Disparities.” If you haven’t read it, the basic premise is that inequalities aren’t necessarily the result of historical injustices.

During the appearance, anchor David Asman asked Sowell about the current fad regarding reparations — one which has been embraced by at least two Democrat presidential contenders, Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris.

Sowell said the premise of the idea — that present inequalities can be blamed on the past — can’t be backed up.

“This is one of any number of one-factor explanations as to why everyone doesn’t have the same outcome,” Sowell said.

“A hundred years ago it was genetics. In other times and places it was exploitation. But again, these are ideas that sound plausible, but when you do research, you discover that everywhere you turn, there are a thousand reasons why people don’t turn out the same.”

Sowell then gave one of the more curious examples from his recent tome.

“It goes right down to the family,” he said.

“In the first chapter of this book, I point out that the firstborn has higher IQs than his siblings and (in) later life has more achievements. Among astronauts, for example, of the 29 astronauts in the Apollo program that put a man on the moon, 22 were either the firstborn or an only child.

“Now, if you can’t get equality among people born to the same parents and raised under the same roof, why in the world do you think you’re going to get it among people who’ve had such different histories and cultures around the world?”

In “Discrimination and Disparities,” Sowell presented even more evidence regarding this unusual disparity.

Video below:
https://youtu.be/iptLrk8Ikmg

| Reply
Mar 12, 2019 13:59:33   #
Mikeyavelli (a regular here)
 
Divine truth wrote:
Yes, "White" Privilege exist in America, and racial discrimination, from males and females, white, Hispanic, and immigrates communities. Most white females, with all due respect made it from selling sex, and engaging in various sexual acts for money. Others made their fortune in the drug and slavery trade. No one can deny this truth, with overwhelming evidences to support it. I was recently at a rest center, and the beautiful white female, got an extension of time, and her stay at the center. This wouldn't happen for anyone of "color". There is a mind set, that says that "blacks" are into the homosexual life, and in order for some "whites" to feel privilege they must degrade "blacks" and other ethnicities. Late 1990s, I had a Hispanic lesbian offer me $1 million dollars to be "gay", and I had Jews indicate given me money to embrace this so-called life. So, everything is based on one's sexual orientation, and the abuse thereof. "Black" females have the same privilege as "white" females and people. Yes, their is hate, discrimination, and opportunities that's isn't open to others. Some members of the homosexual community has more privilege then others and the heterosexual population. I once had a "black" female tell me to "sell myself", totally insane, and something that I would never do. You have "white", brown, yellow and all kinds of females and homosexual males making money in the sex industry. Homosexuality is the limpest test for advancement in the "black" community and Christianity. If one is Muslim all doors are closed, for some, like this writer. Behind this madness is the International Bankers and the illuminati or the satanic powers that be. "White" privilege is real, as well as "black" females privilege, there is no equal opportunity, that's a lie. Even "Africans who come into America have special privilege, and the immigrations communities. Everyone that come into America grow rich off of the ignorance state of the masses. White females have very little respect for the "black" males or "African American" males, most of them use us for advancement and economic objectives. I have been noticing a large "White" population in the homelessness community in New York City. Young beautiful females and young "white" males. If this state continue there will be civil war and blood inn the streets this summer, and "white" females will not be able to live in the urban community, safely. There is a plan in plan to remove them. Let's also consider "black" Wall street. That incident of violence and murder was the results of a lie from a "white" female and "blacks" financial freedom. We have to make some serious changes, or suffer the consequences this summer. The powers that be can't deny me my human, civil and constitutional rights, and think that's I'm going to allow them to violate and abuse me mentally, and with impunity, you are sadly mistaken. It's not just White Privileged its also "black" females and homosexual privilege.
Yes, "White" Privilege exist in America,... (show quote)


Interesting. I had no idea that there was so much sexual deviancy in the black community.

| Reply
Mar 12, 2019 14:03:21   #
Mikeyavelli (a regular here)
 
dongreen76 wrote:
I know where white privilege started ; it started with the Advent of slavery, and with a decided populous advantage of white over black,it started with the implemention of that doctrine known as the Constitution,written with the intention of keeping a climate conducive to the growth and expansion of a `WIG'S " fat cat wallet [George Washington was more than a millionaire in 1776].....- excuse me -of business,there by creating jobs and the little guy getting the trickle down/sustenance


Hey Dong Reen, if you opened a business would every person you hired make the same money as you do? You know, every week you all divvy up the profits?
Is that what you would do?

| Reply
Mar 12, 2019 14:47:25   #
dongreen76 (a regular here)
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
What about the slavery of black on black which existed in sub-Saharan Africa for a thousand years at least before the first White European ever set foot there? What about the slavery that STILL exists there? Slavery ended in this country in 1865, and it ended legally in Africa in 2007. Change the newspaper in your own damn birdcage before you criticize someone else. Nearly every slave imported into what became the US had already been enslaved by other blacks and sold to white slave traders, or to Arabs.
What about the slavery of black on black which exi... (show quote)


What about it,I don't know which one of my post you are referencing,["YOU PEOPLE are constantly on a guilt trip] to conjure such rhettoric, but commenting on the topic at hand-'White Privilege"my intention was not to exploit your guilt,but to answer the question of just how did white privilege come about.
Once again "YOU PEOPLE" continue to debunk the shit out of the theory that you are the master intellects of the human race.

| Reply
Mar 12, 2019 14:51:48   #
JediKnight (a regular here)
 
Smedley_buzkill wrote:
What about the slavery of black on black which existed in sub-Saharan Africa for a thousand years at least before the first White European ever set foot there? What about the slavery that STILL exists there? Slavery ended in this country in 1865, and it ended legally in Africa in 2007. Change the newspaper in your own damn birdcage before you criticize someone else. Nearly every slave imported into what became the US had already been enslaved by other blacks and sold to white slave traders, or to Arabs.
What about the slavery of black on black which exi... (show quote)


Smedley has yet to learn that "two wrongs never make a right." Even if some Africans participated in the slave trade -why would that make it okay for Americans to do it? My mom used to ask me, "so, if some fool decides to lie down in the middle of a highway with 18 wheelers coming are you going to do that too?" If another idiot decides to drink some hemlock and tells you "it tastes so good -try it" are you going to do that as well? BTW - that last part of your post is assumption - which means you're making an ass out of you -not me.

| Reply
Mar 12, 2019 14:52:20   #
JediKnight (a regular here)
 
dongreen76 wrote:
What about it,I don't know which one of my post you are referencing,["YOU PEOPLE are constantly on a guilt trip] to conjure such rhettoric, but commenting on the topic at hand-'White Privilege"my intention was not to exploit your guilt,but to answer the question of just how did white privilege come about.
Once again "YOU PEOPLE" continue to debunk the shit out of the theory that you are the master intellects of the human race.


Way to go Don......BOOM!

| Reply
Mar 12, 2019 15:57:26   #
nwtk2007 (a regular here)
 
Iliamna1 wrote:
Some of the first slave owners here in the USA were black. Slavery has existed since the beginning of time, and all races have been enslaved by someone at some point.


Historically, slavery is much less of a "white" thing.

| Reply
Mar 12, 2019 16:30:57   #
Larry the Legend
 
nwtk2007 wrote:
Historically, slavery is much less of a "white" thing.

Shh! You're supposed to be the 'guilty white man'! You! Only you! If you point out that everyone was in on it, you'll spoil the narrative! How can we create all these victims if there's so many victimizers?

| Reply
Mar 12, 2019 16:42:30   #
JFlorio (a regular here)
 
Larry the Legend wrote:
Shh! You're supposed to be the 'guilty white man'! You! Only you! If you point out that everyone was in on it, you'll spoil the narrative! How can we create all these victims if there's so many victimizers?


No one really answered the question anyway. How did white privilege start in the first place? I mean how did one group subjugate another? Was it because of color privilege? Makes no sense. Seems to me one culture had to be more advanced for whatever reason.

| Reply
Mar 12, 2019 16:56:36   #
Mikeyavelli (a regular here)
 
JFlorio wrote:
No one really answered the question anyway. How did white privilege start in the first place? I mean how did one group subjugate another? Was it because of color privilege? Makes no sense. Seems to me one culture had to be more advanced for whatever reason.


I don't know, I got my White Privilege Card in the mail. Use it all the time, everything is free.

| Reply
Mar 12, 2019 16:56:50   #
JediKnight (a regular here)
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Interesting. I had no idea that there was so much sexual deviancy in the black community.


And if you go back to around 1619 when the first blacks were kidnapped and brought here and subjugated to the evil and sexual deviancy of the white man you would know and understand why there is such a problem in the black community. If you have a problem believing that -then perhaps you should research the Roman Emperor Caligula. White Europeans have always been sexually deviant, and the early Romans and Greeks cherished the deviance by awarding those who "came up with the most deviant and disgusting"sexual rituals. A quick read of the Holy Scriptures reveals that Abraham's kin Lot was sought after by the 'homosexual' men of Sodom and Gomorrah - so that they could "know" him. Hmmm....you ever wonder where that word "sodomy" comes from.....now you know!

| Reply
Mar 12, 2019 17:02:39   #
dongreen76 (a regular here)
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Hey Dong Reen, if you opened a business would every person you hired make the same money as you do? You know, every week you all divvy up the profits?
Is that what you would do?


I don't know where you want to go with that statement,but I'll take you here .Hypothetically speaking.
I own a business,I have employees,I have my best and most productive employee -since he is the best and most productive employee he wants to be compensated as such.He doesn't expect to be compensated as much as I, the owner,but never the less more than the other employees.This notion he has of being paid more is synonymous with the idea of Capiltilisim.I the owner expect for my efforts being the owner to yield me more .than my top employee.In a free market economic system such as Capiltilisim,which is antithetical to socialisim this affect is desired and prevails.Those of us that are most beneficial of the affect more so than others and receive the greater amenities that go along with being the owner and the top employee see where they should be compensated according to what they think is their superior efforts don't want to concede that they are being compensated according.They are the richest,they live in the better neighborhoods,these neighborhoods are given the most attention by law enforcement agencies,the servicres society and the goverment gives them excedes that of the under classes,now since they figure they should be compensated because they are the most productive people's,they do not feel that they should compensate the government-[VIA higher taxes],for the goverments extra diligence toward them,nor do they want to give back to society,for societies paying their exhuberant cost of living,which is not the goverments fault but theirs,They charge the proletariat an arm and a leg for goods and services tendered and rendered, and squeal like a pig when they have to give back in the way of taxes.capiltilisim should work for them and they only .
So far as your analogy of all your employees making as much as you,the owner.I don't know where you are getting these ideas except to say I think you are misconscrueing a few Democrats,whom you think are advocating Marxisim/Socialisim .They are merely thinking more or less of more regulation,to curtail greed .You are interpreting this as pure Socialisim (there does not exist pure Socialisim,nor Communisim,or a pure Democracy)

| Reply
Mar 12, 2019 17:19:52   #
Mikeyavelli (a regular here)
 
dongreen76 wrote:
I don't know where you want to go with that statement,but I'll take you here .Hypothetically speaking.
I own a business,I have employees,I have my best and most productive employee -since he is the best and most productive employee he wants to be compensated as such.He doesn't expect to be compensated as much as I, the owner,but never the less more than the other employees.This notion he has of being paid more is synonymous with the idea of Capiltilisim.I the owner expect for my efforts being the owner to yield me more .than my top employee.In a free market economic system such as Capiltilisim,which is antithetical to socialisim this affect is desired and prevails.Those of us that are most beneficial of the affect more so than others and receive the greater amenities that go along with being the owner and the top employee see where they should be compensated according to what they think is their superior efforts don't want to concede that they are being compensated according.They are the richest,they live in the better neighborhoods,these neighborhoods are given the most attention by law enforcement agencies,the servicres society and the goverment gives them excedes that of the under classes,now since they figure they should be compensated because they are the most productive people's,they do not feel that they should compensate the government-[VIA higher taxes],for the goverments extra diligence toward them,nor do they want to give back to society,for societies paying their exhuberant cost of living,which is not the goverments fault but theirs,They charge the proletariat an arm and a leg for goods and services tendered and rendered, and squeal like a pig when they have to give back in the way of taxes.capiltilisim should work for them and they only .
So far as your analogy of all your employees making as much as you,the owner.I don't know where you are getting these ideas except to say I think you are misconscrueing a few Democrats,whom you think are advocating Marxisim/Socialisim .They are merely thinking more or less of more regulation,to curtail greed .You are interpreting this as pure Socialisim (there does not exist pure Socialisim,nor Communisim,or a pure Democracy)
I don't know where you want to go with that statem... (show quote)


Glad you cleared that up for me.
Socialism is good for others, not you.

| Reply
Mar 12, 2019 17:32:50   #
dongreen76 (a regular here)
 
Mikeyavelli wrote:
Glad you cleared that up for me.
Socialism is good for others, not you.


No, ! that is not what I said,"YOU PEOPLE"
continue to interpret as you want to interpret,to EAR `what you want to hear.

| Reply
Mar 12, 2019 17:39:19   #
JediKnight (a regular here)
 
dongreen76 wrote:
No, ! that is not what I said,"YOU PEOPLE"
continue to interpret as you want to interpret,to EAR `what you want to hear.


Don: be advised that you are dealing with a professional in the art of confusion and obfuscation. Mykavelli takes pride in evading the actual topics by pretending 'he doesn't understand' or twisting your words to mean something other than what you actually said. I would suggest keep your statements short, with no big words when conversing with him. peace.

| Reply
Page: <<prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 next>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2019 IDF International Technologies, Inc.