One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
A poll on Meet The Press shows that 62% of America are enthusiastic and comfortable with a Muslim President for the U.S.
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
Mar 4, 2019 11:16:18   #
woodguru
 
Weasel wrote:
Watching Meet the Press. It was their poll.
I do not know what Meet the Press is trying to do. They more than anyone knows the Laws in America.


The laws being...? This is a free country, we are free to believe wh**ever we want in terms of religion, and the president has that same right.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 11:37:48   #
woodguru
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I would support a president based on their platforms... Religion would play a small part in my decision...

That being said, if I were American, I would most likely not support a Muslim president.... The current geo-political climate has far too many middle Eastern refugees seeking entry into the West... It is my belief that a Muslim president would be more sympathetic to them... These individuals are unlikely to assimulate and pose a very real danger to all Western nations... I know that sounds bigoted, but it is my understanding and my stance..

In the unlikely event that a Muslim candidate took a similar stance to Trump's I would perhaps consider supporting them... It would depend very largely on their other platforms...
I would support a president based on their platfor... (show quote)


Would a Christian president be more sympathetic to Christians who were seeking asylum? Which gives some weight to whether a president should even be a flaming hard Christian such as Pence. A large block of Americans are sensitive to what the hard right is bringing to politics with their religious ideology. If Pence ran his religion would be used against him. There are a vast number of politicians who are religious but their religious "values" are not brought to the front and center. To me the correct position is for a christian to say, "I do not personally believe in a******n, but do not feel it is the government's or anyone else's position to tell a woman what she can do". Many have done so, and the right will not v**e for that person, and the left is not inclined to v**e for the pro life position. I do not care what a person's religion is or if they have one, as long as they aren't in the deep end of bring their religious values into laws.

A Muslim can be president, but there needs to be no attempts to interject those values into our politics, and the same standard applies to Christians. They need to be very careful about how the concept of "practicing their religion" might apply to someone else's religion.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 11:40:13   #
woodguru
 
Weasel wrote:
I was wondering how long it would take before the word Trump would enter the conversation. 360 million people in America, and you try to narrow it down to one man.
I will take your answer to be a Yes. Thanks for your honesty. No matter what spin you try to add. I did say registered v**ers.


Trump is not one man when he tries to represent millions of people.

Reply
 
 
Mar 4, 2019 11:47:29   #
woodguru
 
Kevyn wrote:
I will never support a religious zealot regardless of their faith.


Pence... really? Religious zealots do come in Christian flavors. Any christian on the supreme court, or the new AG that brings super hard religious stances to what they influence is a zealot. Kavanaugh did that in 2017 when he blocked a 17 year old girl who was raped from getting an a******n. He ignored the law and took his own personal position, and was immediately overturned...

...That is too much religion in politics.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 11:50:48   #
woodguru
 
Rose42 wrote:
Absolutely not. Under no circumstance should we ever have a muslim president.


If our rejection of religious values being brought into politics is as strong as it should be it doesn't matter whether it's Muslim or Christian. If the argument in a court case such as a******n or gays relies on religion and the bible it needs to be rejected.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 11:54:27   #
woodguru
 
Weasel wrote:
Watching Meet the Press. It was their poll.
I do not know what Meet the Press is trying to do. They more than anyone knows the Laws in America.


Apply "the laws" that would pertain to sharia laws and their being brought into our politics and we have nothing to worry about, apply them the same exact way into Christian ideology being brought into laws and we should have no issues with Christians being able to "practice" their religion on the job or any other place.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 11:58:25   #
bahmer
 
Weasel wrote:
What in the world has happened to the culture of America. It is time to poll the members of OPP. What do you think. And be honest and direct.
Hell no, I do not want a Muslim President. ●Period●
What say you?
Now some people here will say, what can it hurt, or we could do worse. That is not an answer. (NO more dancing around the issue.)
This is a yes or no question.
What in the world has happened to the culture of A... (show quote)


Hell No no Muslim for me they can all stay in the desert and or go back there and leave America for good.

Reply
 
 
Mar 4, 2019 12:03:50   #
Rose42
 
woodguru wrote:
If our rejection of religious values being brought into politics is as strong as it should be it doesn't matter whether it's Muslim or Christian. If the argument in a court case such as a******n or gays relies on religion and the bible it needs to be rejected.


It sure does matter. If you knew anything about Christianity or Islam you wouldn't make such a statement.

Besides, the most suitable Christian men for the job won't run because there is no forcing anyone into a belief system - as islam would do.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 12:07:58   #
Weasel Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!
 
woodguru wrote:
Would a Christian president be more sympathetic to Christians who were seeking asylum? Which gives some weight to whether a president should even be a flaming hard Christian such as Pence. A large block of Americans are sensitive to what the hard right is bringing to politics with their religious ideology. If Pence ran his religion would be used against him. There are a vast number of politicians who are religious but their religious "values" are not brought to the front and center. To me the correct position is for a christian to say, "I do not personally believe in a******n, but do not feel it is the government's or anyone else's position to tell a woman what she can do". Many have done so, and the right will not v**e for that person, and the left is not inclined to v**e for the pro life position. I do not care what a person's religion is or if they have one, as long as they aren't in the deep end of bring their religious values into laws.

A Muslim can be president, but there needs to be no attempts to interject those values into our politics, and the same standard applies to Christians. They need to be very careful about how the concept of "practicing their religion" might apply to someone else's religion.
Would a Christian president be more sympathetic to... (show quote)


I will put you down for a Yes.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 12:39:56   #
Sicilianthing
 
Weasel wrote:
Watching Meet the Press. It was their poll.
I do not know what Meet the Press is trying to do. They more than anyone knows the Laws in America.


>>>

They’re full of CRAP too

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 12:43:38   #
Sicilianthing
 
woodguru wrote:
The laws being...? This is a free country, we are free to believe wh**ever we want in terms of religion, and the president has that same right.


>>>

Wrong answer:

Islam and Muslim scumbags were banned from the Americas as early as the 16th Century
See Smithsonian archives here:
https://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-136145-1.html

Reply
 
 
Mar 4, 2019 12:44:30   #
Sicilianthing
 
woodguru wrote:
Would a Christian president be more sympathetic to Christians who were seeking asylum? Which gives some weight to whether a president should even be a flaming hard Christian such as Pence. A large block of Americans are sensitive to what the hard right is bringing to politics with their religious ideology. If Pence ran his religion would be used against him. There are a vast number of politicians who are religious but their religious "values" are not brought to the front and center. To me the correct position is for a christian to say, "I do not personally believe in a******n, but do not feel it is the government's or anyone else's position to tell a woman what she can do". Many have done so, and the right will not v**e for that person, and the left is not inclined to v**e for the pro life position. I do not care what a person's religion is or if they have one, as long as they aren't in the deep end of bring their religious values into laws.

A Muslim can be president, but there needs to be no attempts to interject those values into our politics, and the same standard applies to Christians. They need to be very careful about how the concept of "practicing their religion" might apply to someone else's religion.
Would a Christian president be more sympathetic to... (show quote)


>>>

Wrong Answer again !

Muslims can not hold any public office here:



Reply
Mar 4, 2019 12:55:42   #
Weasel Loc: In the Great State Of Indiana!!
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

They’re full of CRAP too


I agree 100%! Meet the Press is just another talk show trying to boost their ratings among morons/sheeple/i***ts who try to argue the obvious.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 12:57:46   #
Sicilianthing
 
Weasel wrote:
I agree 100%! Meet the Press is just another talk show trying to boost their ratings among morons/sheeple/i***ts who try to argue the obvious.


>>>

They should be Sued for publishing false Polls.

Reply
Mar 4, 2019 13:01:42   #
bahmer
 
Sicilianthing wrote:
>>>

They should be Sued for publishing false Polls.


Amen and Amen

Reply
Page <prev 2 of 4 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.