One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Democrats V**e ot Abolish Obsolete Impeachment Procedure
Page <<first <prev 8 of 9 next>
Jan 10, 2019 18:24:38   #
Bad Bob Loc: Virginia
 
Morgan wrote:
You have really have no leg to stand on, with each one of you to judge me about any insults, rudeness,(which I am not) chastisements or wh**ever, truly is the epitome of hypocrisy.

No one has to believe what I do, I simply put up my conclusions, viewpoints and why I've come to my conclusion. It is so rich that people whine to me about my behaviour when every single time I am the one who is chastised first, and I usually don't respond in turn right away but usually after continuous comments, why do I know this to be true because I everytime would prefer a civil conversation.

If people chose to be offensive, then they are creating a dialogue that reflects that. I have countlessly tried to do this with people of opposing views, but as soon as they can't hold up their end, they want to kick dirt in your face and when you kick back they whine and cry. So think of me as a mirror, wh**ever you give out is reflected back.

I would welcome a friendly conversation a thousand times more, but that is a very rare find if speaking with people from the right. Just like when you were kidding with me, I wish I had known you better to have known that, it would've been a nice change from the norm here and I would laughed.

As far as your map, it doesn't really speak of the majority v**e, the e*******l college v**e is crooked as hell. I guess you would also like the win by how many states a candidate wins.

I love when people aren't so much for fairness when they're the ones winning by how the set up is working. Somehow in your thinking, you and your comrades, believe the minority should rule the majority, interesting premise, one the elite love also.

Having a set of party seats isn't kissing anyone's ass, just the opposite,it would prevent majority rule, I thought you guys didn't like that? And yes I love what is "supposed to be" but as we know in politics how many times does that NOT happen, we are talking politics, and that suspicion has been going on since the beginning.
You have really have no leg to stand on, with each... (show quote)



Reply
Jan 10, 2019 18:36:22   #
Morgan
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
Superb...
I believe the maps would have been answer enough...
Bravo...


Tell me, how does it show how Clinton won...twice?

Reply
Jan 10, 2019 18:37:27   #
Morgan
 
Bad Bob wrote:


Thanks Bob...people in glass houses...

Reply
 
 
Jan 10, 2019 18:45:53   #
Morgan
 
PJT wrote:
Morgan: "if people don't want it in return...I'm sorry but I won't stoop to that level. Let them h**e or insult. I will not play those games.
If you wish to stoop... Its your decision.


I did mistake your post to me, for that I owe you an apology, and if you speak to me with civility you will always get that in return. With that said, you did never did make a comment to Seth, is that due to him being along your party line, just curious with the overlook.

Reply
Jan 10, 2019 19:59:59   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Morgan wrote:
Tell me, how does it show how Clinton won...twice?


I believe they show how she lost... Period.

Reply
Jan 10, 2019 20:23:15   #
Morgan
 
lindajoy wrote:
Tsk, tsk, morgan get off your high horse of BS ..
My comment of not having to revert to name calling was meant in attacking individual posters simply because they disagree with his point of view, unlike you who does and then victimizes yourself when someone calls you out.. Your like a broken record with all your “all you want is civility” while you repeatidly bash and belittle others!
This post a perfect example of attacking me for my opinion of something because You don’t like it...

One, I wasn’t speaking to you..
Two, I did not call you or anyone else a name I think my post clearly delineate‘s my position as to why I am in agreement with Buffalo..

Buffalo’s comment was referring to a grouping of people, no different than when you call people “righties and their sick ilk ..” Or your comment in blasting PJT for something he did not even say to you.... Haven’t gotten far enough ahead in reading to see if you apologized to this poster for your uncalled for rant...Doubtful you did but hopeful you may have...

buffalo wrote:
And trumpy. Now I am no fan of trumpy's because I do not like his tax cuts for the wealthy and mega-corporations with the LIE that it is going to help the middle class and working poor. Much of the improvement in the economy,. especially lower unemployment, actually began under his Oliness' reign.

I do not agree that a border wall, or wh**ever you want to call it, is the best solution to stop the invasion of the US by i******s, terrorists, drug and sex smugglers, criminals and gang members. A wall would also cut off access to parts of farmers' and ranchers' land and the river in many places.

IMO, stationing as many troops as necessary along the border and giving them the authority to use wh**ever means (force) necessary to stop the invasion would be a better solution. Think of the economic boom to all the US towns and cities along the border with the military and their families...housing, autos, clothes, local taxes, etc.

Also, stop the BILLIONS ( http://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2017/02/10/514172676/mexicans-in-the-u-s-are-sending-home-more-money-than-ever ) being sent back to Mexico. As for paying for the troops...they were going to get paid regardless.

But the h**e dim-o-craps and their moonbatty apparatchiks have for trumpy and the continual witch hunt to find something on him is ridiculous especially when the biggest criminals reside in their ranks, yet they overlook them.
Tsk, tsk, morgan get off your high horse of BS .. ... (show quote)


Oh brother, you're unbelievable, more bs

Reply
Jan 10, 2019 20:26:36   #
Morgan
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I believe they show how she lost... Period.


Please go ahead explain the first map

Reply
 
 
Jan 10, 2019 20:33:02   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
Morgan wrote:
Please go ahead explain the first map


I believe it is self-explanatory...

As I stated to my friend 'Buffalo' the picture is more than enough by itself...

Reply
Jan 11, 2019 06:17:07   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Morgan wrote:
Please go ahead explain the first map


If you do not understand the first map, or the second map for that matter, then you have no business blathering about the E*******l College. Both maps prove that the E*******l College system worked as it was supposed to in the 2016 P**********l e******n.

If it were not for the E*******l college moonbats in New York, Californication and a few other overpopulated urban areas would always have the v**e advantage. The E*******l College gives equal power to the less populated states.

Reply
Jan 11, 2019 06:35:02   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
buffalo wrote:
If you do not understand the first map, or the second map for that matter, then you have no business blathering about the E*******l College. Both maps prove that the E*******l College system worked as it was supposed to in the 2016 P**********l e******n.

If it were not for the E*******l college moonbats in New York, Californication and a few other overpopulated urban areas would always have the v**e advantage. The E*******l College gives equal power to the less populated states.


We go by the popular v**e in Canada and the Western provinces are often outraged at the results... We have a much smaller portion of the population that the east and contribute a disproportionate amount to the GDP... It isn't as bad as in the US as we have five parties... But the e*******l college serves a purpose that many Canadians can sympathize with...

Reply
Jan 11, 2019 06:57:11   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
We go by the popular v**e in Canada and the Western provinces are often outraged at the results... We have a much smaller portion of the population that the east and contribute a disproportionate amount to the GDP... It isn't as bad as in the US as we have five parties... But the e*******l college serves a purpose that many Canadians can sympathize with...


Yes, I can see where that would be unfair. In the US politicians ensure the continued existence of only a 2 party system. This is a big problem as any third parties are marginalized and ignored by the media.

Reply
 
 
Jan 11, 2019 07:00:38   #
Canuckus Deploracus Loc: North of the wall
 
buffalo wrote:
Yes, I can see where that would be unfair. In the US politicians ensure the continued existence of only a 2 party system. This is a big problem as any third parties are marginalized and ignored by the media.


I have often thought the introduction of a third party (a centrist party) would benefit the US...
If anything it would act as a wake up call to both the Democrats and Republicans...

Reply
Jan 11, 2019 07:35:29   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
We go by the popular v**e in Canada and the Western provinces are often outraged at the results... We have a much smaller portion of the population that the east and contribute a disproportionate amount to the GDP... It isn't as bad as in the US as we have five parties... But the e*******l college serves a purpose that many Canadians can sympathize with...


Good Morning~~

Is having five parties well balanced within the political structure of Canada?? Would they prefer an e*******l v****g process given what you share here??

Also how about the The C*******t Party of Canada? I understand it is now a political party without any elected political representation, although candidates have been elected within various governments of Canada?? Do they have a strong backing and if so who fosters its growth, party wise??
I know they were stripped of being an active party recognized sometime back but from the little I understand of it they did not dismantle so to speak and continue to be active in the labour force????

Its snowing here~~ are you still having your -20C??? Brrrr~~~

Reply
Jan 11, 2019 07:54:26   #
lindajoy Loc: right here with you....
 
Canuckus Deploracus wrote:
I have often thought the introduction of a third party (a centrist party) would benefit the US...
If anything it would act as a wake up call to both the Democrats and Republicans...


It would most definately benefit the US... Others such as independants or libertarian parties exist but like Buffalo said have little backing being suppressed by the two party powerhouses that know they threatenen their existence..

In 2016 Colorado v**ed to allow Independants to v**e in the midterms, before that they could not until the general e******ns.. . A good move but why did we have to v**e to allow Independants to v**e in midterm e******ns at all?? The right to v**e will not be denied or abridged by the United States yet some can and can not with the claim of opened or closed e******ns and everyone being allowed to v**e the general e******ns....

Reply
Jan 11, 2019 08:17:15   #
buffalo Loc: Texas
 
lindajoy wrote:
It would most definately benefit the US... Others such as independants or libertarian parties exist but like Buffalo said have little backing being suppressed by the two party powerhouses that know they threatenen their existence..

In 2016 Colorado v**ed to allow Independants to v**e in the midterms, before that they could not until the general e******ns.. . A good move but why did we have to v**e to allow Independants to v**e in midterm e******ns at all?? The right to v**e will not be denied or abridged by the United States yet some can and can not with the claim of opened or closed e******ns and everyone being allowed to v**e the general e******ns....
It would most definately benefit the US... Others ... (show quote)


In Texas primaries you can only v**e democrat or republican. A third party candidate must have gotten at least 5% of the v**es in the last e******n to qualify to be on the b****t in the general e******n. The corporate duopoly ensures that only their dimwit or repulsive puppets get elected. That way they control v**er choices and care less which party is in the majority and the sheople are duped into thinking they have real choices.

Reply
Page <<first <prev 8 of 9 next>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.