Larry the Legend wrote:
Those fires didn't just appear out of thin air. They had plenty of warning but left it too late and now the consequences kick in. I'm reminded of the i***ts who k**l themselves every year after a hurricane because they ran the generator in the living room and suffocated on the fumes. Of course, if they didn't build their homes so close to heavily forested areas there would be no threat and no panic, no desperately trying to get out as the flames come licking at the door. That's why people who live on a hill never get flooded. Same principle.
Of course, if their forest service actually managed the forests they're supposed to be caring for, these fires would never be possible in the first place. Keeping the dead wood and brush under control would eliminate all of these fires before they had a chance to get hold, but no, the resulting disasters are far more desirable. Just wait a few months and you'll be hearing about how there are terrible mudslides sweeping more houses away. Gee, there's a huge surprise. Again. It's so regular you can almost set your watch by it, and still they keep doing the same things, expecting different results.
Those fires didn't just appear out of thin air. T... (
show quote)
——————-
“Those fires didn't just appear out of thin air. They had plenty of warning but left it too late and now the consequences kick in.”
You need to pull your head out from inside your butt. Have you been told what caused these fires? If so, you’re more ahead of the game than the California fire officials are. They’ve not released any causes, except to say there’s a “possibility” that one of the fires was caused by an electrical ground fault along a PG&E power line. Tell me, Larry, how do you plan for those? How do you plan for lightening strikes? They’re the most likely cause of the fires.
Also, contrary to what you said, many people did NOT have much warning. Most had only 15 to 30 minutes warning. Add to that, as time progressed and more people took to the roads, the roads became clogged and traffic was forced to slow down, allowing the fires to reach people in their cars.
From your moniker, I’m going to guess you really do live in the Florida Panhandle. Every year, portions of Florida are devastated by hurricanes, flooding and tornadoes. Every year, many people die as a result of those disasters. How many deaths could be averted if those citizens moved away from the Florida coast? How many would be alive if they’d built their home to be hurricane and tornado proof? How about requiring ALL Panhandle houses be built, at least, 20’ above the ground so as to avoid being flooded?
Why doesn’t your state government come up with plans to better predict when and exactly where these hurricanes will come ashore and where the tornadoes will spawn? Why doesn’t your state government do a better job helping the victims of hurricanes and tornadoes rebuild and get back on their feet. Why doesn’t Florida’s government restrict building along the coast so as to keep destruction, injury and deaths to an absolute minimum?
Larry, unless you actually live in California, you have no right to criticize how it operates its lands. When you can show that Florida can control its weather, then, you might have a right to speak to California about theirs.
BTW: I live in Middle Tennessee. While we don’t get many hurricanes here (They’re usually classified as tropical storms by the time they get here.), we do get more than our share of tornadoes. So, I know, first-hand, what kind of destruction, injury and death these kinds of storms can bring.