Seth wrote:
Please enlighten me.
Okay, since you won't.
The fire presently blazing has reached Malibu. I've hiked some of the canyons in that area, including Tuna Canyon, which is IN Malibu.
You know what I saw? Lots of different varieties of pine and other types of trees, many dried out, some obviously dead and a thick carpet of dead foliage, dead, dried foliage everywhere.
A narrow stream runs down the canyon, I traced it's source, it seems to come from an underground lake. The stream is so narrow as to provide little relief from any trees that might fall across it if they're on fire.
A dropped cigarette butt not entirely extinguished could turn the entire canyon into a blazing inferno very quickly, and the way it is situated, no one would notice until the fire had spilled over the top into Topanga Canyon, another dry, fire ready hazard and no different from any of the other neighboring canyons.
As I understand it, and I could be wrong, those aren't federal lands, they belong to either L.A. County or the State of California. A friend from the area tells me they are not federally owned.
I've hiked forests further north, including the section of the Sierras that are within the State of California and there is no difference.
I've hiked Mt. Tamalpais in the Bay Area, again, no difference.
Mendocino, no difference.
No wonder you don't have an explanation as to why I am "wrong."