alabuck wrote:
I found this website and thought its reasoning on a******n and the Judaeo/Christian ethic rather interesting. So, I posted portions of it for your comments.
The legal status of a fetus, compiled from a BBC website on religion
One of the basic tenants of the pro-lifers, especially in the US, centers on the belief that the fetus is a person at conception. This tenant has its genesis (no pun intended) in an interpretation of Jewish and Christian Biblical passages which are said to prove the belief in humanity at conception and the sanctity of life.
A little background for our non-believers who've never been to church nor have ever read the Bible.
Christianity is the faith based on the belief that Jesus of Nazareth is the Christ, the Son of God, who was sent to the world to sacrifice Himself on behalf of mankind, so that mankind, by accepting Jesus as their savior, can receive God's grace and live an eternal life after death, in Heaven, with God.
According to the Bible, although conceived by the virgin, Mary, with the Holy Spirit, Jesus is prophesized to be from the lineage of the Israelite king, David. As a child, Jesus, during a trip to Jerusalem by His parents, was found, "in His Father's house," the Temple, with the priests. Later, as a young adult, He spent a lot of time in the Temple and the local synagogue, teaching the Jewish Torah (the Law) and other religious books.
It's safe to say that Jesus was Jewish, being brought up in the Jewish religion and Jewish customs, and being the Son of the God of Israel. Jesus spends His adult life ministering to the poor and downtrodden of Israel. He healed the sick, raised some from the dead and, spoke against the collection of riches on Earth, and taught His followers to take care of the less fortunate because as He said, "wh**ever you do to the least of these, you do to Me."
To the chagrin of the Saduccees and the Pharisees, the 2 major political/religious parties in Israel, Jesus developed a following. (One must know that at this time, Israel was a theocracy, much like the Islamic theocratic states who practice Sharia Law, today.). To silence Him, the members of the 2 parties had Him arrested and turned over to the Roman ruler, Pontious Pilot, for k*****g. After a mock trial, Jesus was tortured, scourged and crucified; all in accordance with the Jewish religious prophecies in the Torah that Jesus' tormentors failed to note.
After Jesus died, rose from the dead, met with His disciples and 500 other people, t***sfigured and assented into Heaven, His followers began a new religion based on the belief that Jesus was, indeed, the Son of God, sent to fulfill the prophecies. The new religion was called "The Way." Later, it came to be called Christianity, and it's followers, "Christians."
Today, modern Christians tend to forget that Jesus was first, Jewish; that He taught in the Temple; that He taught Jewish religion and traditions. Part of those traditions and religious beliefs dealt with pregnancy and the unborn.
Now, for the parts of the BBCwebsite:
"Traditional Judaism regards a fetus as a being part of the mother's body that is developing towards being a person.
"The easiest way to conceptualize a fetus in "Halacha" [Jewish law] is to imagine it as a full-fledged human being - but not quite. In Judaism a fetus is not considered to be a person until it is born. Before that, it is regarded as a part of the mother's body, although it does possess certain characteristics of a person and some status. During the first forty days after conception, it is considered 'mere fluid'.
"According to the Halacha or Jewish Law a fetus is considered part of the mother's body and not a full human being. The book of Exodus (21:22) says...
"When men fight and one of them pushes a pregnant woman and a miscarriage results, but no other damage ensues, the one responsible shall be fined according as the woman's husband may exact from him, the payment to be based on reckoning. But if other damage ensues, the penalty shall be life for life... ." "Other damage" is taken, in this text, to mean "the death of the mother."
"This passage is interpreted as saying that causing the fetus to miscarry is a civil wrong that gives rise to the right to financial restitution - which indicates that the fetus is not a person. But, k*****g the mother is murder, because the mother is a person.
"From an ethical point of view, then: a fetus is not a person but a fetus should nonetheless be protected to some extent because it is growing towards full personhood. So a fetus should not be destroyed or harmed except for very good reasons. The high status given to a fetus is demonstrated by the fact that Jewish law permits desecration of the Sabbath in order to save the life of a fetus.
"The distinguished Jewish rabbi Rashi wrote: "For as long as it (the fetus) did not come out into the world, it is not called a living thing and it is permissible to take its life in order to save its mother. Once the head has come forth, it may not be harmed because it is considered born, and one life may not be taken to save another. This passage, too, makes it clear that Judaism regards a fetus as a lesser human being than a human being who has been (at least partially) born.
"But although the fetus has no personhood and therefore none of the rights and privileges of a human being, it must still be protected as a potential human being, and not casually harmed or destroyed."
"The Talmud (commentary on Jewish oral traditions) gives other examples on the status of the fetus.
"The first involves the sale of a cow, which is subsequently found to be pregnant. No payment is made for the sale of the fetus to the buyer and the fetus belongs to the buyer.
"The second example concerns the conversion of a pregnant woman to Judaism. Jewish law regards the conversion valid for her future child as well, requiring no separate conversion for it after birth."
Okay, all you pro-choices and pro-lifers, what say ye?
I found this website and thought its reasoning on ... (
show quote)
alabuck, without the BBC URL, it's impossible to know exactly what you're discussing in toto. Could you post it, please?
Following are three highly regarded Bible versions of the verse to which I believe you are alluding:
Exodus 21:22-23 (HCSB) When men get in a fight and hit a pregnant woman so that her children are born prematurely, but there is no injury, the one who hit her must be fined as the womans husband demands from him, and he must pay according to judicial assessment.
If there is an injury, then you must give life for life,"
Exodus 21:22-23 (NIV) "If men who are fighting hit a pregnant woman and she gives birth prematurely but there is no serious injury, the offender must be fined wh**ever the woman's husband demands and the court allows.
But if there is serious injury, you are to take life for life,"
Exodus 21:22-23 (NKJV) "If men fight, and hurt a woman with child, so that she gives birth prematurely, yet no harm follows, he shall surely be punished accordingly as the woman's husband imposes on him; and he shall pay as the judges determine.
"But if any harm follows, then you shall give life for life,"
From the word order of the sentence, it seems obvious that the baby is
being referenced, strongly inferring that a******n is a capital offense.
Animals have no souls, nor are they created in God's image, so the fetus of a cow is irrelevant.
Christians are not under Jewish law. We're under the New Covenant of Grace, which Jesus instituted at His Last Supper with His disciples before the crucifixion.
It's impossible to be under both.
John 1:17 "For the Law was given through Moses; grace and t***h were realized through Jesus Christ."
Romans 4:16 "For this reason it is by faith, in order that it may be in accordance with grace, so that the promise will be guaranteed to all the descendants, not only to those who are of the Law, but also to those who are of the faith of Abraham, who is the father of us all,"
Romans 5:20 "The Law came in so that the t***sgression would increase; but where sin increased, grace abounded all the more,"
Romans 6:14 "For sin shall not be master over you, for you are not under law but under grace."
Romans 6:15 "What then? Shall we sin because we are not under law but under grace? May it never be!"
Galatians 2:21 "I do not nullify the grace of God, for if righteousness comes through the Law, then Christ died needlessly."
Galatians 5:4 "You have been severed from Christ, you who are seeking to be justified by law; you have fallen from grace."
Jesus did teach the Scriptures of the Tanakh (Old Testament), but not the many Jewish traditions made up by men.
Mark 7:13 (Jesus said,) "And so you cancel the word of God in order to hand down your own tradition. And this is only one example among many others."
The reason some verses are omitted from the newer versions of the Bible, the NAS, the NIV, the ESV and the HCSB, among others, is because Archaeologists have discovered many older manuscripts of the New Testament since the Geneva or King James versions of the Bible were recopied by hand, and these manuscripts were unavailable to those who produced them.
These older manuscripts DID NOT contain those verses of which you speak, and it was determined the verses had been inadvertently copied as though text, after being written in as study aids in prior versions - after their completion, for the Tyndale Bible was copied to the newer Geneva Bible, and the Geneva Bible, in turn, was copied to create the King James.
Because the oldest manuscripts did not contain the extra "verses," they were correctly omitted from newer versions, which did go back to the best and oldest manuscripts in the original tongues, Hebrew, Greek and Aramaic.
Your topic is replete with errors, and Yes, A******n is against God's will as expressed in His Holy Scriptures.
A******n is murder.