One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
Is a******n really against God's law?
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
Apr 26, 2014 13:16:27   #
cant beleve Loc: Planet Kolob
 
bob siddell jr wrote:
Your wires must be crossed up in your head.


I've not gotten any women in your position. So? No messages to need learning. But I suppose that had I seen what you claim I would evaluate my positions. My wires being crossed? We all have some electrical problems. :-) never claimed perfection,just forgiven. Peace brother. :|

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 13:57:46   #
bob siddell jr
 
cant beleve wrote:
I've not gotten any women in your position. So? No messages to need learning. But I suppose that had I seen what you claim I would evaluate my positions. My wires being crossed? We all have some electrical problems. :-) never claimed perfection,just forgiven. Peace brother. :|


I can't help myself; you're not all bad. I doubt you will see what I saw or wh**ever hundreds of others were shown. Few murders get a vision of Jesus (like Saul/Paul). Have some faith that most Christians tell the t***h and learn from the NT to today. Evaluate your positions ASAP likewise. I don't think Michael (much less Jesus or God) are going to be persuaded by your logic and change their positions. Can you find credible witnesses of God supporting a******n, use of dope, homosexuality, porno, C*******m, Islam etc?

Reply
Apr 26, 2014 14:10:40   #
son of witless
 
alabuck wrote:
I do agree with you about the laugh of a baby; it is infectious!


I still want anyone to make a case for why a late term fetus is not a human being. It's certainly not animal, vegetable, or mineral. Having seen newborns, I try to imagine how far back in it's development one has to go to call it non human. Maybe we call them pre-human and imagine them as apes. Anything to ease our consciences.

We certainly will do what ever is required to legally k**l them.

Reply
 
 
Apr 26, 2014 23:07:46   #
Ricktloml
 
BigMike wrote:
Not Jewish, but I do know that Christian tradition for the most part considers a developing fetus a child and that Scripture interprets Scripture. Anything in Scripture needs to be evaluated by what the rest of Scripture says. The Bible also has God saying "In your mother's womb I formed you", and there are other verses that state God's involvement with us begins before we are born. It's enough for me to take a second look at the morality of a******n. At times I believe a******n may be necessary, but at best it's a tragedy and it certainly isn't a "victory" for women or society.

I'd also point out that there is plenty of legal precedent in the US as to the personhood of an unborn child - the Peterson and Gosnell cases to name a couple of the most recent. There are plenty more.

In any event, the last I heard, pregnancy in and of itself isn't a disease or any other life threatening condition. Therefore, I don't think society should have to pay for something that at best is a morally dubious elective procedure. If a woman's life is in danger that's another story.
Not Jewish, but I do know that Christian tradition... (show quote)


Until such time as there is undeniable, irrefutable proof that life does NOT begin at conception, taking a chance is immoral, and when you consider exactly what occurs during an a******n, the butchering and dismemberment of that baby, the only way to describe it is savage and barbaric

Reply
Page <<first <prev 7 of 7
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.