Anigav6969

Lol....it's starting to sound like your the clueless one...things did change around 1980.. The statistics prove it...since then, the rich have gotten richer, the middle class has shrunk..and the poor are getting poorer...it started with Reagan ...and yes Obama has not helped

Kevyn

The ACA is about as far from socialism as you can get. Other than the VA which is not part of the ACA none of the insurance company's who administer, Hospitals and Doctors who provide health care or pharmacys and drug company's that provide medicine are owned by the government. The ACA is nothing more than a change in regulation of a private industry that was already regulated. The systems in many Country's in Europe, Austraulia, New Zealand and Canada employ health care workers, this sort of system of national medical service could be called socialist I suppose, but ours under the ACA is anything but.

just chris

Come on all you folks know Obama never went to college he was at a Madras in Kenya planning to destroy America learning Sharia law and reading Karl Marx!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Kevyn

A socialist would have nationalized banks and industry not bailed them out, it is pretty obvious that most of the posters here do not have a clue what they are writing about.

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

Should you be able to obtain auto insurance for your wrecked auto after the fact?

just chris

Comparing auto insurance to health insurance, let's see your cars company were it works closes or lays your car off because it's to sick to work so it can't get insurance any more. Ya your right it's the same.

just chris

And don't forget a true Socialist Dictator would have lined all the bankers and hedge fund managers up and shot them. (just saying)

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

Health insurance is to protect one in the event of an illness or catastrophe. It isn't to fix any current problems before being purchased. If one wishes to be covered for any eventuality they should purchase insurance. One doesn't purchase home insurance after the house burns down.

just chris

I guess I undestand now if my house is built with Diabetes or some other disease I shouldn't be able obtain insurance okay got it.

PoppaGringo Loc: Muslim City, Mexifornia, B.R.

If you want coverage, obtain it before contracting diabetes. That is what insurance is for, to cover you for an illness before you are afflicted.

just chris

Ok I give up here it is, perhaps you are born with Diabetes or some other health issue or something happens when you are a child or teenager before you can buy insurance. By the way it's not that rare what happens? I guess it's the governments job to pick up the tab.

Anigav6969

Thanks for that...I agree 100%

Anigav6969

Are you saying that someone who is sick or has a condition like MS should be denied by insurance companies?

Anigav6969

You gotta love these god fearing Christian conservatives...you're sick ? Go f**k yourself....oh, and may The Lord be with you!...total hypocrisy

Coupdecu

No president is above the law and these are not all the thnings he has done !!!!!!!!!!

"If A President Can Change Some Laws, Can He Change All Laws? ... What Is Our Recourse?" - Trey Gowdy

In short, the ENFORCE the Law Act would enable Members of Congress to sue the Executive Branch – including Barack Obama – in federal court when it disregards or f**grantly violates the U.S. Constitution.

As Gowdy put it: "This bill is necessary; it will give Congress the authority to defend this branch of government as the Framers and our fellow citizens would expect."

The Separation of Powers enumerated in the Constitution aren't difficult to understand. In fact, they are so easy to understand that we teach them to 10-year-olds in our nation's failing public schools.

But Mr. I-Am-A-Constitutional-Scholar Obama and his minions seem to have difficulty with the very same concept that is understood by grade school children.

After the House passed Gowdy's bill on a bipartisan v**e, Barack Obama immediately issued a statement that said: "Congress may not assign such power to itself." It would appear that Mr. Obama isn't reading the same Constitution that our Founders signed and ratified.

And one of Mr. Obama's puppets in Congress, ultra-liberal Representative James P. McGovern, (D-MA), trumpeted Obama's dictatorial delusion when he said, "You guys just don't like the president. I get it. But get over it," just before declaring that Gowdy's bill is "unconstitutional."

Sorry Mr. McGovern, but the American people aren't just "going to get over it."

Gowdy asked: "If a president can change some laws, can he change all laws?" In light of the statements and actions coming from Mr. Obama and his allies in Congress, we must ask: If a president can declare entire sections of the Constitution unconstitutional, what is to stop him (or her) from effectively declaring that the entire Constitution is unconstitutional?
Fast and Furious, IRS targeting conservatives, Bengazi , Calling Photo ID r****t, wining the presidency by one percent and having more that that in v***r f***d!!!!!!!!!!