You believe anything these liars have been saying for years. You do remember this group predicting a horrific g****l c*****g in the past. Right? So why do you believe them now? Hurricanes aren't any worse historically dummy. Many more people live closer to the coasts. Same with tornado's. If the oceans are rising it's not because of ice melting (it's a volume thing) it's because everything is being covered with concrete. All the fresh water hear in Tampa Bay used to soak into the ground. Now it runs into the bay and is k*****g the ecosystem. Much easier for the politicians too blame the problem on g****l w*****g, something that can't be fixed than admit the real problem. Development. You are nothing more than a useful tool of the left.

How do you know the Earth has been here for billions of years? You learned it in public schools when you learned about dinosaurs and human evolution. All you really know is a theory, not facts. Dinosaurs are real, we have the fossils to prove it and some have been found with soft tissue and blood cells, proving they are not billions of years old. Pottery has been found with modern-looking humans with dinosaurs. There is no way to prove how old a rock is. A worldwide flood, volcanos, and the ring of fire explain an ice age better than billions of years. Just saying. Evolution and the billions of years theory have only been around for a couple of hundred years. No proof and taught as facts instead of theory. Just like g****l c*****g and warming. Fukushima is also a fact and the radiation is still leaking into the ocean in Japan. That is probably a real-life world ending event. What would happen if all sea life died? Mass extinction of untold species in the oceans and on land. And it gets very little coverage in the MSM, you have to go to alt-news sites to keep up with it. Proving the MSM is controlled and largely f**e just like our education system which is dumbing us down fast. If you want the t***h, I suggest you read and study the Bible. It explains the past and predicts the future and just happens to be the number one best selling, read, studied, and printed book worldwide, as a matter of fact, it was the first book printed by Gutenberg. There are about 2500 prophecies in the old and new testaments and only about 500 left to occur. Which seems to indicate that both the old and new testaments are inspired by God and that the age of man is nearing its end which also strangely agrees with the Hebrew calendar that says we are in about the year 5777 from creation. If man's allotted time is 6000 years, we are almost there and rebuilding the third temple is in the works. Odd how Fukushima occurred at this point which is alluded to in the book of Revelation. The Bible is so accurate it's uncanny. Even the statistical odds are off the charts. Well worth the time and effort to read, study, trust and maybe live by it. Couldn't hurt.

3 Decades of G****l W*****g Predictions Have Failed

In the 1970s, the left was pushing a climate scare tactic known as G****l C*****g. Its purpose was to frighten Americans into v****g for unaccountable federal programs that would strangle business and citizens with high taxes and out of control regulations.

There was even a popular Iron Maiden song about it called Total Eclipse with overtly anti-human lyrics. “Sunrise has gone, freezing up the fires. Sunrise has gone, numbing our desires.”

You get the picture.

But G****l C*****g never happened. They needed a new climate game. So, in 1988, a 30-year G****l W*****g forecast was published. Can you even imagine the backroom conversations that must have went on?

SCENE: In a smoky conservatory, Somewhere in Washington, D.C…

G*******t #1: (slams a glass of bourbon on the table) ‘Our g****l c*****g s**m didn’t work, Stanton. What do we do now?’

G*******t #2: ‘Initiate operation G****l W*****g (opens mouth for a sinister laugh)’

G*******t #3: (steps away from the Slip-N-Slide) ‘Not so fast Leopold! The public needs at least ten years to forget this whole g****l c*****g debacle. We’ll publish a g****l w*****g scare sometime in the late 80s.’

G*******t #1: ‘But what’ll we do till then, Reginald?’

G*******t #3: ‘I don’t know, drown teenagers at Lolita Island and have those Clinton kids in Arkansas cover it up? They seem desperate to prove themselves!’

All: (Laugh uproariously)

Fast forward 30 years and guess what, g****l w*****g projections for the last three decades have turned out to be just as wrong as the g****l c*****g projections of the 70s. The Wall Street Journal has just released a review of the predictions, and they have never even come close to being correct. It’s almost like they just made it up from whole cloth.

In June of 1988, NASA climatologist James Hansen testified before a Senate Committee saying; “We have concluded, with a high degree of confidence that a cause and effect relationship exists between the claimed CO2 induced greenhouse effect and observed warming.”

A note: Whenever the Government is lying about a scientific issue, you’re bound to hear weasel phrases like “high degree of confidence.”

According to the primary source material from the predictions, actual surface temperatures were increasing between the years 1960 and 1990. But in 1990, the projections look like a rocket while actual surface temperatures increase at a much slower rate. Temperature predictions for the current year are double what they actually are.

Climate models developed by the United Nations around the same time are equally faulty. But how could they be so wrong? The projections were based on a sharp increase in temperatures between the years 1984 and 1989. Surface temperatures dipped sharply in the previous four years, and then began to rise. The projections in the G****l W*****g Forecast of 1988 was based on a four-year trend.

It’s almost as if these experts took a crash course in global climatology in 1983 and then started looking at current data and panicked. That’s the most generous interpretation of the facts we could muster. But the fact that they wanted to hijack the entire government and rig the economy t***sforms what might have been a huge mistake into an attempted power grab of epic proportions.

The models for g****l w*****g are based on very brief temperature trends and do not take even decades-long temperature records into account. On top of this, they want us to believe that 97% of climate scientists agree with projections based on a four year period. That would mean 97% of them are wrong, and the next time they claim a huge consensus, we should simply ignore it outright.

All of this may be laughable. Yes, it makes people like Al Gore- who predicted that the ice caps would be liquefied by now- look like standard issue con men. But don’t think for a moment that they didn’t get everything they wanted. They did.

Huge environmental agencies with lots of political power have been created, and over the years, more than a billion dollars has been shoved into the pockets of the people crying wolf.

If you want a prediction you can count on, try this one on for size: The c*****e c****e scare will fade into obscurity over the next ten years. The public will forget about it. Then, sometime around 2088, g****l c*****g will make headlines… and with a high degree of confidence, we predict Iron Maiden will stage a comeback tour.

Of course c*****e c****e is real. The climate has been changing for billions of years, even before man could possibly make a difference. Man MAY BE responsible for some small amount, more likely man's harm to the earth takes the form of pollution, which the US endeavors to prevent and clean up better than most. So many of these con men, when speaking to the like minded have already admitted this is about wealth redistribution, and the power that goes with that, on a global scale. The 97% consensus has been debunked so completely on so many levels, it's hard to believe ANYONE could continue to fall for this h**x. Sadly those who are called useful i***ts earned that title honestly

Of course c*****e c****e is real. The climate has been changing for billions of years, even before man could possibly make a difference. Man MAY BE responsible for some small amount, more likely man's harm to the earth takes the form of pollution, which the US endeavors to prevent and clean up better than most. So many of these con men, when speaking to the like minded have already admitted this is about wealth redistribution, and the power that goes with that, on a global scale. The 97% consensus has been debunked so completely on so many levels, it's hard to believe ANYONE could continue to fall for this h**x. Sadly those who are called useful i***ts earned that title honestly

Of course c*****e c****e is real. The climate has been changing for billions of years, even before man could possibly make a difference. Man MAY BE responsible for some small amount, more likely man's harm to the earth takes the form of pollution, which the US endeavors to prevent and clean up better than most. So many of these con men, when speaking to the like minded have already admitted this is about wealth redistribution, and the power that goes with that, on a global scale. The 97% consensus has been debunked so completely on so many levels, it's hard to believe ANYONE could continue to fall for this h**x. Sadly those who are called useful i***ts earned that title honestly