Conspiracy by conservatives, of the United Nations, one world government, population control, one world currency, ect, ect

Perm... Years ago even decades, conservatives were warning and called conspiracy nuts.

But have you read any actual documents of the United Nations?
Here as an example is from the United Nations own website...
http://www.un.org/popin/icpd/conference/bkg/wppa.html

Here's a good one that you l*****t mocked us conservatives and now you can read it from official documents. United nations Agenda 2030
http://www.un.org/popin/icpd/conference/bkg/wppa.html

http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/t***sformingourworld

If you actually read it, you will learn it's the beginning of the United nations having authority over Americans, losing freedoms, property rights, ect

And here is the United nations small arms treaty, and second amendment. How the United nations is gaining speed at gun confiscation.
You are aware Obama had an EO that allowed the United Nations military to arrest Americans on American soil? Nothing came from it, but it would only take a l*****t to be elected and it would become a reality, which I believe will happen.


Cut and paste into your URL

www.libertygunrights.com/2TreatySet10Pgs.pdf

Your link gives us an 502 Error--Bad Gateway.

How Climate Alarmism Advances International Political Agendas

The term “climate” is typically associated with annual world-wide average temperature records measured over at least three decades. Yet g****l w*****g observed less than two decades after many scientists had predicted a g****l c*****g crisis prompted the United Nations to organize an Intergovernmental Panel on C*****e C****e (IPCC), and to convene a continuing series of international conferences purportedly aimed at preventing an impending catastrophe. Virtually from the beginning, they had already attributed the “crisis” to human fossil-fuel carbon emissions.

Opening remarks offered by Maurice Strong, who organized the first U.N. Earth Climate Summit (1992) in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, revealed the real goal: “We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse. Isn’t it our responsibility to bring this about?”

Former U.S. Senator Timothy Wirth (D-CO), then representing the Clinton-Gore administration as U.S Undersecretary of State for global issues, addressing the same Rio Climate Summit audience, agreed: “We have got to ride the g****l w*****g issue. Even if the theory of g****l w*****g is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic policy and environmental policy.” (Wirth now heads the UN Foundation which lobbies for hundreds of billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars to help underdeveloped countries fight c*****e c****e.)

Also speaking at the Rio conference, Deputy Assistant of State Richard Benedick, who then headed the policy divisions of the U.S. State Department said: “A g****l w*****g treaty [Kyoto] must be implemented even if there is no scientific evidence to back the [enhanced] greenhouse effect.”

In 1988, former Canadian Minister of the Environment Christine Stewart told editors and reporters of the Calgary Herald: “No matter if the science of g****l w*****g is all phony…c*****e c****e [provides] the greatest opportunity to bring about justice and e******y in the world.”

In 1996, former Soviet Union President Mikhail Gorbachev emphasized the importance of using climate alarmism to advance socialist Marxist objectives: “The threat of environmental crisis will be the international disaster key to unlock the New World Order.”

Speaking at the 2000 UN Conference on C*****e C****e in the Hague, former President Jacques Chirac of France explained why the IPCC’s climate initiative supported a key Western European Kyoto Protocol objective: “For the first time, humanity is instituting a genuine instrument of global governance, one that should find a place within the World Environmental Organization which France and the European Union would like to see established.”

The Costs of Ideology Masquerading as Science

As Greenpeace co-founder Peter Moore observed onFox Business News in January 2011: “We do not have any scientific proof that we are the cause of the g****l w*****g that has occurred in the last 200 years…The alarmism is driving us through scare tactics to adopt energy policies that are going to create a huge amount of energy poverty among the poor people. It’s not good for people and it’s not good for the environment…In a warmer world we can produce more food.”

When Moore was asked who is responsible for promoting unwarranted climate fear and what their motives are, he said: “A powerful convergence of interests. Scientists seeking grant money, media seeking headlines, universities seeking huge grants from major institutions, foundations, environmental groups, politicians wanting to make it look like they are saving future generations. And all of these people have converged on this issue.”

Paul Ehrlich, best known for his 1968 doom and gloom book, The Population Bomb, reported in a March 2010 Nature editorial that a barrage of challenges countering the notion of a looming g****l w*****g catastrophe has his alarmist colleagues in big sweats: “Everyone is scared s***less [fecally void], but they don’t know what to do.”

Yes, and it should, because consequences of subordinating climate science to ideology, however well-intentioned, have proven to be incredibly costly.

The U.S. Government Accounting Office (GAO) reports that federal climate spending has increased from $4.6 billion in 2003 to $8.8 billion in 2010 (a total $106.7 billion over that period). This doesn’t include $79 billion more spent for c*****e c****e technology research, tax breaks for “g***n e****y”, foreign aid to help other countries address “climate problems”; another $16.1 billion since 1993 in federal revenue losses due to g***n e****y subsidies; or still another $26 billion earmarked for c*****e c****e programs and related activities in the 2009 “Stimulus Bill.”

Virtually all of this is based upon unfounded representations that we are experiencing a known human-caused climate crisis, a claim based upon speculative theories, contrived data and totally unproven modeling predictions. And what redemptive solutions are urgently implored? We must give lots of money to the U.N. to redistribute; abandon f****l f**l use in favor of heavily subsidized but assuredly abundant, “free”, and “renewable” alternatives; and expand federal government growth, regulatory powers, and crony capitalist-enriched political campaign coffers.

It is way past time to realize that none of this is really about protecting the planet from man-made c*****e c****e. It never was.

G****l W*****g was never about c*****e c****e!

U.N. Official Reveals Real Reason Behind Warming Scare

Economic Systems: The alarmists keep telling us their concern about g****l w*****g is all about man's stewardship of the environment. But we know that's not true. A United Nations official has now confirmed this.

At a news conference last week in Brussels, Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of U.N.'s Framework Convention on C*****e C****e, admitted that the goal of environmental activists is not to save the world from ecological calamity but to destroy capitalism.

"This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years, since the Industrial Revolution," she said.

Referring to a new international treaty environmentalists hope will be adopted at the Paris c*****e c****e conference later this year, she added: "This is probably the most difficult task we have ever given ourselves, which is to intentionally t***sform the economic development model for the first time in human history."

The only economic model in the last 150 years that has ever worked at all is capitalism. The evidence is prima facie: From a feudal order that lasted a thousand years, produced zero growth and kept workdays long and lifespans short, the countries that have embraced free-market capitalism have enjoyed a system in which output has increased 70-fold, work days have been halved and lifespans doubled.

Figueres is perhaps the perfect person for the job of t***sforming "the economic development model" because she's really never seen it work. "If you look at Ms. Figueres' Wikipedia page," notes Cato economist Dan Mitchell: Making the world look at their right hand while they choke developed economies with their left.

Conspiracy by conservatives, of the United Nations, one world government, population control, one world currency, ect, ect

Perm... Years ago even decades, conservatives were warning and called conspiracy nuts.

But have you read any actual documents of the United Nations?
Here as an example is from the United Nations own website...
http://www.un.org/popin/icpd/conference/bkg/wppa.html

Here's a good one that you l*****t mocked us conservatives and now you can read it from official documents. United nations Agenda 2030
http://www.un.org/popin/icpd/conference/bkg/wppa.html

http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/post2015/t***sformingourworld

If you actually read it, you will learn it's the beginning of the United nations having authority over Americans, losing freedoms, property rights, ect

And here is the United nations small arms treaty, and second amendment. How the United nations is gaining speed at gun confiscation.
You are aware Obama had an EO that allowed the United Nations military to arrest Americans on American soil? Nothing came from it, but it would only take a l*****t to be elected and it would become a reality, which I believe will happen.


Cut and paste into your URL

www.libertygunrights.com/2TreatySet10Pgs.pdf