One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Main
3 Decades of G****l W*****g Predictions Have Failed
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
Jun 30, 2018 09:37:02   #
no propaganda please Loc: moon orbiting the third rock from the sun
 
3 Decades of G****l W*****g Predictions Have Failed

In the 1970s, the left was pushing a climate scare tactic known as G****l C*****g. Its purpose was to frighten Americans into v****g for unaccountable federal programs that would strangle business and citizens with high taxes and out of control regulations.

There was even a popular Iron Maiden song about it called Total Eclipse with overtly anti-human lyrics. “Sunrise has gone, freezing up the fires. Sunrise has gone, numbing our desires.”

You get the picture.

But G****l C*****g never happened. They needed a new climate game. So, in 1988, a 30-year G****l W*****g forecast was published. Can you even imagine the backroom conversations that must have went on?

SCENE: In a smoky conservatory, Somewhere in Washington, D.C…

G*******t #1: (slams a glass of bourbon on the table) ‘Our g****l c*****g s**m didn’t work, Stanton. What do we do now?’

G*******t #2: ‘Initiate operation G****l W*****g (opens mouth for a sinister laugh)’

G*******t #3: (steps away from the Slip-N-Slide) ‘Not so fast Leopold! The public needs at least ten years to forget this whole g****l c*****g debacle. We’ll publish a g****l w*****g scare sometime in the late 80s.’

G*******t #1: ‘But what’ll we do till then, Reginald?’

G*******t #3: ‘I don’t know, drown teenagers at Lolita Island and have those Clinton kids in Arkansas cover it up? They seem desperate to prove themselves!’

All: (Laugh uproariously)

Fast forward 30 years and guess what, g****l w*****g projections for the last three decades have turned out to be just as wrong as the g****l c*****g projections of the 70s. The Wall Street Journal has just released a review of the predictions, and they have never even come close to being correct. It’s almost like they just made it up from whole cloth.

In June of 1988, NASA climatologist James Hansen testified before a Senate Committee saying; “We have concluded, with a high degree of confidence that a cause and effect relationship exists between the claimed CO2 induced greenhouse effect and observed warming.”

A note: Whenever the Government is lying about a scientific issue, you’re bound to hear weasel phrases like “high degree of confidence.”

According to the primary source material from the predictions, actual surface temperatures were increasing between the years 1960 and 1990. But in 1990, the projections look like a rocket while actual surface temperatures increase at a much slower rate. Temperature predictions for the current year are double what they actually are.

Climate models developed by the United Nations around the same time are equally faulty. But how could they be so wrong? The projections were based on a sharp increase in temperatures between the years 1984 and 1989. Surface temperatures dipped sharply in the previous four years, and then began to rise. The projections in the G****l W*****g Forecast of 1988 was based on a four-year trend.

It’s almost as if these experts took a crash course in global climatology in 1983 and then started looking at current data and panicked. That’s the most generous interpretation of the facts we could muster. But the fact that they wanted to hijack the entire government and rig the economy t***sforms what might have been a huge mistake into an attempted power grab of epic proportions.

The models for g****l w*****g are based on very brief temperature trends and do not take even decades-long temperature records into account. On top of this, they want us to believe that 97% of climate scientists agree with projections based on a four year period. That would mean 97% of them are wrong, and the next time they claim a huge consensus, we should simply ignore it outright.

All of this may be laughable. Yes, it makes people like Al Gore- who predicted that the ice caps would be liquefied by now- look like standard issue con men. But don’t think for a moment that they didn’t get everything they wanted. They did.

Huge environmental agencies with lots of political power have been created, and over the years, more than a billion dollars has been shoved into the pockets of the people crying wolf.

If you want a prediction you can count on, try this one on for size: The c*****e c****e scare will fade into obscurity over the next ten years. The public will forget about it. Then, sometime around 2088, g****l c*****g will make headlines… and with a high degree of confidence, we predict Iron Maiden will stage a comeback tour.

Reply
Jun 30, 2018 09:42:27   #
bahmer
 
no propaganda please wrote:
3 Decades of G****l W*****g Predictions Have Failed

In the 1970s, the left was pushing a climate scare tactic known as G****l C*****g. Its purpose was to frighten Americans into v****g for unaccountable federal programs that would strangle business and citizens with high taxes and out of control regulations.

There was even a popular Iron Maiden song about it called Total Eclipse with overtly anti-human lyrics. “Sunrise has gone, freezing up the fires. Sunrise has gone, numbing our desires.”

You get the picture.

But G****l C*****g never happened. They needed a new climate game. So, in 1988, a 30-year G****l W*****g forecast was published. Can you even imagine the backroom conversations that must have went on?

SCENE: In a smoky conservatory, Somewhere in Washington, D.C…

G*******t #1: (slams a glass of bourbon on the table) ‘Our g****l c*****g s**m didn’t work, Stanton. What do we do now?’

G*******t #2: ‘Initiate operation G****l W*****g (opens mouth for a sinister laugh)’

G*******t #3: (steps away from the Slip-N-Slide) ‘Not so fast Leopold! The public needs at least ten years to forget this whole g****l c*****g debacle. We’ll publish a g****l w*****g scare sometime in the late 80s.’

G*******t #1: ‘But what’ll we do till then, Reginald?’

G*******t #3: ‘I don’t know, drown teenagers at Lolita Island and have those Clinton kids in Arkansas cover it up? They seem desperate to prove themselves!’

All: (Laugh uproariously)

Fast forward 30 years and guess what, g****l w*****g projections for the last three decades have turned out to be just as wrong as the g****l c*****g projections of the 70s. The Wall Street Journal has just released a review of the predictions, and they have never even come close to being correct. It’s almost like they just made it up from whole cloth.

In June of 1988, NASA climatologist James Hansen testified before a Senate Committee saying; “We have concluded, with a high degree of confidence that a cause and effect relationship exists between the claimed CO2 induced greenhouse effect and observed warming.”

A note: Whenever the Government is lying about a scientific issue, you’re bound to hear weasel phrases like “high degree of confidence.”

According to the primary source material from the predictions, actual surface temperatures were increasing between the years 1960 and 1990. But in 1990, the projections look like a rocket while actual surface temperatures increase at a much slower rate. Temperature predictions for the current year are double what they actually are.

Climate models developed by the United Nations around the same time are equally faulty. But how could they be so wrong? The projections were based on a sharp increase in temperatures between the years 1984 and 1989. Surface temperatures dipped sharply in the previous four years, and then began to rise. The projections in the G****l W*****g Forecast of 1988 was based on a four-year trend.

It’s almost as if these experts took a crash course in global climatology in 1983 and then started looking at current data and panicked. That’s the most generous interpretation of the facts we could muster. But the fact that they wanted to hijack the entire government and rig the economy t***sforms what might have been a huge mistake into an attempted power grab of epic proportions.

The models for g****l w*****g are based on very brief temperature trends and do not take even decades-long temperature records into account. On top of this, they want us to believe that 97% of climate scientists agree with projections based on a four year period. That would mean 97% of them are wrong, and the next time they claim a huge consensus, we should simply ignore it outright.

All of this may be laughable. Yes, it makes people like Al Gore- who predicted that the ice caps would be liquefied by now- look like standard issue con men. But don’t think for a moment that they didn’t get everything they wanted. They did.

Huge environmental agencies with lots of political power have been created, and over the years, more than a billion dollars has been shoved into the pockets of the people crying wolf.

If you want a prediction you can count on, try this one on for size: The c*****e c****e scare will fade into obscurity over the next ten years. The public will forget about it. Then, sometime around 2088, g****l c*****g will make headlines… and with a high degree of confidence, we predict Iron Maiden will stage a comeback tour.
3 Decades of G****l W*****g Predictions Have Faile... (show quote)


Amen and Amen

Reply
Jun 30, 2018 10:05:46   #
roy
 
no propaganda please wrote:
3 Decades of G****l W*****g Predictions Have Failed

In the 1970s, the left was pushing a climate scare tactic known as G****l C*****g. Its purpose was to frighten Americans into v****g for unaccountable federal programs that would strangle business and citizens with high taxes and out of control regulations.

There was even a popular Iron Maiden song about it called Total Eclipse with overtly anti-human lyrics. “Sunrise has gone, freezing up the fires. Sunrise has gone, numbing our desires.”

You get the picture.

But G****l C*****g never happened. They needed a new climate game. So, in 1988, a 30-year G****l W*****g forecast was published. Can you even imagine the backroom conversations that must have went on?

SCENE: In a smoky conservatory, Somewhere in Washington, D.C…

G*******t #1: (slams a glass of bourbon on the table) ‘Our g****l c*****g s**m didn’t work, Stanton. What do we do now?’

G*******t #2: ‘Initiate operation G****l W*****g (opens mouth for a sinister laugh)’

G*******t #3: (steps away from the Slip-N-Slide) ‘Not so fast Leopold! The public needs at least ten years to forget this whole g****l c*****g debacle. We’ll publish a g****l w*****g scare sometime in the late 80s.’

G*******t #1: ‘But what’ll we do till then, Reginald?’

G*******t #3: ‘I don’t know, drown teenagers at Lolita Island and have those Clinton kids in Arkansas cover it up? They seem desperate to prove themselves!’

All: (Laugh uproariously)

Fast forward 30 years and guess what, g****l w*****g projections for the last three decades have turned out to be just as wrong as the g****l c*****g projections of the 70s. The Wall Street Journal has just released a review of the predictions, and they have never even come close to being correct. It’s almost like they just made it up from whole cloth.

In June of 1988, NASA climatologist James Hansen testified before a Senate Committee saying; “We have concluded, with a high degree of confidence that a cause and effect relationship exists between the claimed CO2 induced greenhouse effect and observed warming.”

A note: Whenever the Government is lying about a scientific issue, you’re bound to hear weasel phrases like “high degree of confidence.”

According to the primary source material from the predictions, actual surface temperatures were increasing between the years 1960 and 1990. But in 1990, the projections look like a rocket while actual surface temperatures increase at a much slower rate. Temperature predictions for the current year are double what they actually are.

Climate models developed by the United Nations around the same time are equally faulty. But how could they be so wrong? The projections were based on a sharp increase in temperatures between the years 1984 and 1989. Surface temperatures dipped sharply in the previous four years, and then began to rise. The projections in the G****l W*****g Forecast of 1988 was based on a four-year trend.

It’s almost as if these experts took a crash course in global climatology in 1983 and then started looking at current data and panicked. That’s the most generous interpretation of the facts we could muster. But the fact that they wanted to hijack the entire government and rig the economy t***sforms what might have been a huge mistake into an attempted power grab of epic proportions.

The models for g****l w*****g are based on very brief temperature trends and do not take even decades-long temperature records into account. On top of this, they want us to believe that 97% of climate scientists agree with projections based on a four year period. That would mean 97% of them are wrong, and the next time they claim a huge consensus, we should simply ignore it outright.

All of this may be laughable. Yes, it makes people like Al Gore- who predicted that the ice caps would be liquefied by now- look like standard issue con men. But don’t think for a moment that they didn’t get everything they wanted. They did.

Huge environmental agencies with lots of political power have been created, and over the years, more than a billion dollars has been shoved into the pockets of the people crying wolf.

If you want a prediction you can count on, try this one on for size: The c*****e c****e scare will fade into obscurity over the next ten years. The public will forget about it. Then, sometime around 2088, g****l c*****g will make headlines… and with a high degree of confidence, we predict Iron Maiden will stage a comeback tour.
3 Decades of G****l W*****g Predictions Have Faile... (show quote)


And with more property being burned ,tornados getting worse hurricane getting stronger,oceans rising people already looseing their homes,more floods over 100 year flood plans,even more over 200 and 300 but who knows.Your the expert.Bet if trump said we were in a g****l w*****g peroid.god you people would believe every word.

Reply
 
 
Jun 30, 2018 10:12:10   #
trucksterbud
 
no propaganda please wrote:
3 Decades of G****l W*****g Predictions Have Failed

In the 1970s, the left was pushing a climate scare tactic known as G****l C*****g. Its purpose was to frighten Americans into v****g for unaccountable federal programs that would strangle business and citizens with high taxes and out of control regulations.

There was even a popular Iron Maiden song about it called Total Eclipse with overtly anti-human lyrics. “Sunrise has gone, freezing up the fires. Sunrise has gone, numbing our desires.”

You get the picture.

But G****l C*****g never happened. They needed a new climate game. So, in 1988, a 30-year G****l W*****g forecast was published. Can you even imagine the backroom conversations that must have went on?

SCENE: In a smoky conservatory, Somewhere in Washington, D.C…

G*******t #1: (slams a glass of bourbon on the table) ‘Our g****l c*****g s**m didn’t work, Stanton. What do we do now?’

G*******t #2: ‘Initiate operation G****l W*****g (opens mouth for a sinister laugh)’

G*******t #3: (steps away from the Slip-N-Slide) ‘Not so fast Leopold! The public needs at least ten years to forget this whole g****l c*****g debacle. We’ll publish a g****l w*****g scare sometime in the late 80s.’

G*******t #1: ‘But what’ll we do till then, Reginald?’

G*******t #3: ‘I don’t know, drown teenagers at Lolita Island and have those Clinton kids in Arkansas cover it up? They seem desperate to prove themselves!’

All: (Laugh uproariously)

Fast forward 30 years and guess what, g****l w*****g projections for the last three decades have turned out to be just as wrong as the g****l c*****g projections of the 70s. The Wall Street Journal has just released a review of the predictions, and they have never even come close to being correct. It’s almost like they just made it up from whole cloth.

In June of 1988, NASA climatologist James Hansen testified before a Senate Committee saying; “We have concluded, with a high degree of confidence that a cause and effect relationship exists between the claimed CO2 induced greenhouse effect and observed warming.”

A note: Whenever the Government is lying about a scientific issue, you’re bound to hear weasel phrases like “high degree of confidence.”

According to the primary source material from the predictions, actual surface temperatures were increasing between the years 1960 and 1990. But in 1990, the projections look like a rocket while actual surface temperatures increase at a much slower rate. Temperature predictions for the current year are double what they actually are.

Climate models developed by the United Nations around the same time are equally faulty. But how could they be so wrong? The projections were based on a sharp increase in temperatures between the years 1984 and 1989. Surface temperatures dipped sharply in the previous four years, and then began to rise. The projections in the G****l W*****g Forecast of 1988 was based on a four-year trend.

It’s almost as if these experts took a crash course in global climatology in 1983 and then started looking at current data and panicked. That’s the most generous interpretation of the facts we could muster. But the fact that they wanted to hijack the entire government and rig the economy t***sforms what might have been a huge mistake into an attempted power grab of epic proportions.

The models for g****l w*****g are based on very brief temperature trends and do not take even decades-long temperature records into account. On top of this, they want us to believe that 97% of climate scientists agree with projections based on a four year period. That would mean 97% of them are wrong, and the next time they claim a huge consensus, we should simply ignore it outright.

All of this may be laughable. Yes, it makes people like Al Gore- who predicted that the ice caps would be liquefied by now- look like standard issue con men. But don’t think for a moment that they didn’t get everything they wanted. They did.

Huge environmental agencies with lots of political power have been created, and over the years, more than a billion dollars has been shoved into the pockets of the people crying wolf.

If you want a prediction you can count on, try this one on for size: The c*****e c****e scare will fade into obscurity over the next ten years. The public will forget about it. Then, sometime around 2088, g****l c*****g will make headlines… and with a high degree of confidence, we predict Iron Maiden will stage a comeback tour.
3 Decades of G****l W*****g Predictions Have Faile... (show quote)



If you're familiar with TedTalksX, you can find the most informative video about c*****e c****e and the h**x surrounding it. Basically, the global elite want to charge us "TO BREATHE....!!!"

Reply
Jun 30, 2018 10:13:44   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
no propaganda please wrote:
3 Decades of G****l W*****g Predictions Have Failed

In the 1970s, the left was pushing a climate scare tactic known as G****l C*****g. Its purpose was to frighten Americans into v****g for unaccountable federal programs that would strangle business and citizens with high taxes and out of control regulations.

There was even a popular Iron Maiden song about it called Total Eclipse with overtly anti-human lyrics. “Sunrise has gone, freezing up the fires. Sunrise has gone, numbing our desires.”

You get the picture.

But G****l C*****g never happened. They needed a new climate game. So, in 1988, a 30-year G****l W*****g forecast was published. Can you even imagine the backroom conversations that must have went on?

SCENE: In a smoky conservatory, Somewhere in Washington, D.C…

G*******t #1: (slams a glass of bourbon on the table) ‘Our g****l c*****g s**m didn’t work, Stanton. What do we do now?’

G*******t #2: ‘Initiate operation G****l W*****g (opens mouth for a sinister laugh)’

G*******t #3: (steps away from the Slip-N-Slide) ‘Not so fast Leopold! The public needs at least ten years to forget this whole g****l c*****g debacle. We’ll publish a g****l w*****g scare sometime in the late 80s.’

G*******t #1: ‘But what’ll we do till then, Reginald?’

G*******t #3: ‘I don’t know, drown teenagers at Lolita Island and have those Clinton kids in Arkansas cover it up? They seem desperate to prove themselves!’

All: (Laugh uproariously)

Fast forward 30 years and guess what, g****l w*****g projections for the last three decades have turned out to be just as wrong as the g****l c*****g projections of the 70s. The Wall Street Journal has just released a review of the predictions, and they have never even come close to being correct. It’s almost like they just made it up from whole cloth.

In June of 1988, NASA climatologist James Hansen testified before a Senate Committee saying; “We have concluded, with a high degree of confidence that a cause and effect relationship exists between the claimed CO2 induced greenhouse effect and observed warming.”

A note: Whenever the Government is lying about a scientific issue, you’re bound to hear weasel phrases like “high degree of confidence.”

According to the primary source material from the predictions, actual surface temperatures were increasing between the years 1960 and 1990. But in 1990, the projections look like a rocket while actual surface temperatures increase at a much slower rate. Temperature predictions for the current year are double what they actually are.

Climate models developed by the United Nations around the same time are equally faulty. But how could they be so wrong? The projections were based on a sharp increase in temperatures between the years 1984 and 1989. Surface temperatures dipped sharply in the previous four years, and then began to rise. The projections in the G****l W*****g Forecast of 1988 was based on a four-year trend.

It’s almost as if these experts took a crash course in global climatology in 1983 and then started looking at current data and panicked. That’s the most generous interpretation of the facts we could muster. But the fact that they wanted to hijack the entire government and rig the economy t***sforms what might have been a huge mistake into an attempted power grab of epic proportions.

The models for g****l w*****g are based on very brief temperature trends and do not take even decades-long temperature records into account. On top of this, they want us to believe that 97% of climate scientists agree with projections based on a four year period. That would mean 97% of them are wrong, and the next time they claim a huge consensus, we should simply ignore it outright.

All of this may be laughable. Yes, it makes people like Al Gore- who predicted that the ice caps would be liquefied by now- look like standard issue con men. But don’t think for a moment that they didn’t get everything they wanted. They did.

Huge environmental agencies with lots of political power have been created, and over the years, more than a billion dollars has been shoved into the pockets of the people crying wolf.

If you want a prediction you can count on, try this one on for size: The c*****e c****e scare will fade into obscurity over the next ten years. The public will forget about it. Then, sometime around 2088, g****l c*****g will make headlines… and with a high degree of confidence, we predict Iron Maiden will stage a comeback tour.
3 Decades of G****l W*****g Predictions Have Faile... (show quote)

30 years of false G****l C*****g claims preceded the G****l W*****g h**x.

Reply
Jun 30, 2018 10:14:34   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
You believe anything these liars have been saying for years. You do remember this group predicting a horrific g****l c*****g in the past. Right? So why do you believe them now? Hurricanes aren't any worse historically dummy. Many more people live closer to the coasts. Same with tornado's. If the oceans are rising it's not because of ice melting (it's a volume thing) it's because everything is being covered with concrete. All the fresh water hear in Tampa Bay used to soak into the ground. Now it runs into the bay and is k*****g the ecosystem. Much easier for the politicians too blame the problem on g****l w*****g, something that can't be fixed than admit the real problem. Development. You are nothing more than a useful tool of the left.
roy wrote:
And with more property being burned ,tornado's getting worse hurricane getting stronger,oceans rising people already looseing their homes,more floods over 100 year flood plans,even more over 200 and 300 but who knows.Your the expert.Bet if trump said we were in a g****l w*****g peroid.god you people would believe every word.

Reply
Jun 30, 2018 11:53:24   #
Radiance3
 
no propaganda please wrote:
3 Decades of G****l W*****g Predictions Have Failed

In the 1970s, the left was pushing a climate scare tactic known as G****l C*****g. Its purpose was to frighten Americans into v****g for unaccountable federal programs that would strangle business and citizens with high taxes and out of control regulations.

There was even a popular Iron Maiden song about it called Total Eclipse with overtly anti-human lyrics. “Sunrise has gone, freezing up the fires. Sunrise has gone, numbing our desires.”

You get the picture.

But G****l C*****g never happened. They needed a new climate game. So, in 1988, a 30-year G****l W*****g forecast was published. Can you even imagine the backroom conversations that must have went on?

SCENE: In a smoky conservatory, Somewhere in Washington, D.C…

G*******t #1: (slams a glass of bourbon on the table) ‘Our g****l c*****g s**m didn’t work, Stanton. What do we do now?’

G*******t #2: ‘Initiate operation G****l W*****g (opens mouth for a sinister laugh)’

G*******t #3: (steps away from the Slip-N-Slide) ‘Not so fast Leopold! The public needs at least ten years to forget this whole g****l c*****g debacle. We’ll publish a g****l w*****g scare sometime in the late 80s.’

G*******t #1: ‘But what’ll we do till then, Reginald?’

G*******t #3: ‘I don’t know, drown teenagers at Lolita Island and have those Clinton kids in Arkansas cover it up? They seem desperate to prove themselves!’

All: (Laugh uproariously)

Fast forward 30 years and guess what, g****l w*****g projections for the last three decades have turned out to be just as wrong as the g****l c*****g projections of the 70s. The Wall Street Journal has just released a review of the predictions, and they have never even come close to being correct. It’s almost like they just made it up from whole cloth.

In June of 1988, NASA climatologist James Hansen testified before a Senate Committee saying; “We have concluded, with a high degree of confidence that a cause and effect relationship exists between the claimed CO2 induced greenhouse effect and observed warming.”

A note: Whenever the Government is lying about a scientific issue, you’re bound to hear weasel phrases like “high degree of confidence.”

According to the primary source material from the predictions, actual surface temperatures were increasing between the years 1960 and 1990. But in 1990, the projections look like a rocket while actual surface temperatures increase at a much slower rate. Temperature predictions for the current year are double what they actually are.

Climate models developed by the United Nations around the same time are equally faulty. But how could they be so wrong? The projections were based on a sharp increase in temperatures between the years 1984 and 1989. Surface temperatures dipped sharply in the previous four years, and then began to rise. The projections in the G****l W*****g Forecast of 1988 was based on a four-year trend.

It’s almost as if these experts took a crash course in global climatology in 1983 and then started looking at current data and panicked. That’s the most generous interpretation of the facts we could muster. But the fact that they wanted to hijack the entire government and rig the economy t***sforms what might have been a huge mistake into an attempted power grab of epic proportions.

The models for g****l w*****g are based on very brief temperature trends and do not take even decades-long temperature records into account. On top of this, they want us to believe that 97% of climate scientists agree with projections based on a four year period. That would mean 97% of them are wrong, and the next time they claim a huge consensus, we should simply ignore it outright.

All of this may be laughable. Yes, it makes people like Al Gore- who predicted that the ice caps would be liquefied by now- look like standard issue con men. But don’t think for a moment that they didn’t get everything they wanted. They did.

Huge environmental agencies with lots of political power have been created, and over the years, more than a billion dollars has been shoved into the pockets of the people crying wolf.

If you want a prediction you can count on, try this one on for size: The c*****e c****e scare will fade into obscurity over the next ten years. The public will forget about it. Then, sometime around 2088, g****l c*****g will make headlines… and with a high degree of confidence, we predict Iron Maiden will stage a comeback tour.
3 Decades of G****l W*****g Predictions Have Faile... (show quote)

=================
G****l w*****g? What happened during the mid-seventy's. My friends and I usually went to Green Lake to swim. The temperature was in the 90's. Not anymore. The average temp we have in our area now is in the 60's in June. That goes there only during the later part of the day. Early morning is 40's to 50 degrees. Where is that g****l w*****g?

Al Gore made several hundreds of millions of dollars for f**e theory and deception.

Reply
 
 
Jun 30, 2018 14:51:35   #
Manning345 Loc: Richmond, Virginia
 
Radiance3 wrote:
=================
G****l w*****g? What happened during the mid-seventy's. My friends and I usually went to Green Lake to swim. The temperature was in the 90's. Not anymore. The average temp we have in our area now is in the 60's in June. That goes there only during the later part of the day. Early morning is 40's to 50 degrees. Where is that g****l w*****g?

Al Gore made several hundreds of millions of dollars for f**e theory and deception.


Predicting the weather and climate for years in the future using past data trends has the obvious flaw that past trends do not necessarily mean future events will oblige. The climate models used by the UN have been flawed from the start, and have been shown up for their deficiencies. So, its going to be hot before it gets cold and then hot again, and cold again just as it has for thousands of years. I do wish the Antarctic ice coverage was reported for the entire continent each year.

Reply
Jun 30, 2018 17:57:23   #
Chocura750
 
Reports of a record breaking heat wave over the central United States must I assume be f**e news.

Reply
Jun 30, 2018 17:59:52   #
Super Dave Loc: Realville, USA
 
Chocura750 wrote:
Reports of a record breaking heat wave over the central United States must I assume be f**e news.


Or natural weather trends.

Reply
Jun 30, 2018 18:33:22   #
Radiance3
 
Manning345 wrote:
Predicting the weather and climate for years in the future using past data trends has the obvious flaw that past trends do not necessarily mean future events will oblige. The climate models used by the UN have been flawed from the start, and have been shown up for their deficiencies. So, its going to be hot before it gets cold and then hot again, and cold again just as it has for thousands of years. I do wish the Antarctic ice coverage was reported for the entire continent each year.

---------------------
It is 3:23 PM now, 60 degrees right here in the suburb of Seattle. It is dark and dreary, gloomy, with intermittent shower. During the 70's, we were young and happy, in the 90 degrees, especially coming July 4th. In May and June, we used to go to the Rose garden, and the Japanese garden, the Zoo watched the praying gorilla, or lake Washington for a swim. Oh, no, water is too cold now. Nobody is in the water. Where is g****l w*****g Al Gore?

Reply
 
 
Jun 30, 2018 18:37:39   #
JFlorio Loc: Seminole Florida
 
Chocura750 wrote:
Reports of a record breaking heat wave over the central United States must I assume be f**e news.


You do know the earths been around a couple billion years or so? So statistically looking at an area where the temps have been recorded for say a couple hundred years and comparing to billions of years is not only stupid it would not be excepted in any statistical analysis.

Reply
Jul 1, 2018 07:15:32   #
jack sequim wa Loc: Blanchard, Idaho
 
Radiance3 wrote:
---------------------
It is 3:23 PM now, 60 degrees right here in the suburb of Seattle. It is dark and dreary, gloomy, with intermittent shower. During the 70's, we were young and happy, in the 90 degrees, especially coming July 4th. In May and June, we used to go to the Rose garden, and the Japanese garden, the Zoo watched the praying gorilla, or lake Washington for a swim. Oh, no, water is too cold nowen. Nobody is in the water. Where is g****l w*****g Al Gore?



Hello Radiance,

I was born and raised in the Seattle metro. West Seattle in the 60's sledding down the hills and swimming in the summer off Alki Beach, then the early seventies winters warmed and no more sledding. By the early 2000's seemed more like two seasons a year, instead of the four in my youth and shorter summers, early fall that stretched until the short summer.
Interesting that if we go back a thousand years, there was several times more Co2 than now, periods of much hotter years, colder years.
The left being godless, if they read the word of God they would see God is in control of the world not man. We can pollute the world but it is God that brings the seasons and his creation the earth has experienced "g****l w*****g" or "C*****e c****e" when earth's population could fit into the state of California and zero man created pollution. The lefts c*****e c****e / g****l w*****g demonically lead.

Reply
Jul 1, 2018 09:40:51   #
Radiance3
 
jack sequim wa wrote:
Hello Radiance,

I was born and raised in the Seattle metro. West Seattle in the 60's sledding down the hills and swimming in the summer off Alki Beach, then the early seventies winters warmed and no more sledding. By the early 2000's seemed more like two seasons a year, instead of the four in my youth and shorter summers, early fall that stretched until the short summer.
Interesting that if we go back a thousand years, there was several times more Co2 than now, periods of much hotter years, colder years.
The left being godless, if they read the word of God they would see God is in control of the world not man. We can pollute the world but it is God that brings the seasons and his creation the earth has experienced "g****l w*****g" or "C*****e c****e" when earth's population could fit into the state of California and zero man created pollution. The lefts c*****e c****e / g****l w*****g demonically lead.
Hello Radiance, br br I was born and raised in t... (show quote)

=================
Interesting Jack, my uncle and his wife had a home up in the hill in West Seattle, beautiful view. It was small and old home, he bought after coming home WW2. I lived there for a while in 1968-70. They were both gone now, but left the old home to me. I sold it in 1987, which I regretted because prices of homes there now are too expensive. Went swimming at Alki Beach, and Jul 4th was astounding. May and June, we enjoyed the Rose Garden and the Woodland Park Zoo, visiting that looked like praying gorilla with 2 babies playing around her. We also went swimming at Green Lake in Seattle. Lake was clean and beautiful then, but now polluted, and plenty of crawling weeds and lilies. I guess that is the democrat way. Seattle and Washington are always run by democrats.

Reply
Jul 1, 2018 09:51:47   #
muruburuDustuDog7
 
It is true Republicans do live in a bubble. Get real. We have 90% less snow pack in our area than we did in the 70's which is the summer water supply for our valleys which grow a lot of the food for our country and other countries. You should get some actual facts not the,Russians bots crap your reading.

Reply
Page 1 of 6 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Main
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.