Primum non nocere - First do no harm

Health Care

Cause and Effect--------- When change is to take place especially to the extent of health care. All consequences should have been weighed.
Suggest using a Rogerian Approach
A negotiating strategy in which common goals are identified and opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground and reach agreement.
Whereas traditional argument focuses on winning, the Rogerian model seeks a mutually satisfactory solution.
A solution based on the t***h would have satisfied everyone. The problems with the ACA could have been avoided.
My background is in automating solutions for the Medical provider industry and understand the challenges faced by all affected parties DRs, Patients, Insurers & government entities. This ACA business model had so many flaws in it that it will never work. Something better is needed and there are successful models out there that should have been followed.

Only if the government is God and Christ is it's son.

You miss quote that text "the least of these your brethren." I don't suppose you comprehend a difference, but that doesn't mean it is not there.

Governments are not omniscient or omnipotent and cannot alleviate suffering in the manner you claim they can.

The Law of the Christian's God commands, "Thou shalt not covet" and "Thou shalt not steal." Christians believe they are repentant t***sgressors of the commands of God, which means they have turned from violating his commands. If the Nation were "Christian" no person could want or take money taken by force. Taxes are taken by force, as it is criminal not to pay one's taxes.

I reject your entire hypothesis as false beginning to end.

Instead this whole concept of the government being capable of these miracles, I think, is form worshipping the government as a god. Your false god you claim capable of curing the ill, providing for the poor, and more.

The essence of religion and state are combined as one entity, both in your and my thinking.

Primum non nocere - First do no harm

Health Care

Cause and Effect--------- When change is to take place especially to the extent of health care. All consequences should have been weighed.
Suggest using a Rogerian Approach
A negotiating strategy in which common goals are identified and opposing views are described as objectively as possible in an effort to establish common ground and reach agreement.
Whereas traditional argument focuses on winning, the Rogerian model seeks a mutually satisfactory solution.
A solution based on the t***h would have satisfied everyone. The problems with the ACA could have been avoided.
My background is in automating solutions for the Medical provider industry and understand the challenges faced by all affected parties DRs, Patients, Insurers & government entities. This ACA business model had so many flaws in it that it will never work. Something better is needed and there are successful models out there that should have been followed.

The no Blame Game------- The T***h and Nothing but the t***h

Typical businessman’s strategy beginning of year sit down with accounting & go over budget Review costs, marketing, sales & cash flow.
Measure risks & rewards. Try to understand current market conditions make sure you can keep company going for yourself, employees and customers. Currently there is a negative feeling of doubt as to current market conditions raising capital, employee benefit cost , will economy grow etc.
Remember it all starts with private sector creating a value that drives the economy and it’s how employees, vendors & government gets paid. The private sector makes a better use of assets to create more assets or that company goes out of business and is replaced by a more efficient company always increasing Value or it dies.



So in the best interests of all we should help the private sector any way possible to grow and that’s how we will receive the revenue to use for all the good things.

This may be true, but in the past twenty years it never even made it to the table. ACA may have many flaws, but it has forced the conversation out in the open rather than sweeping it back under the rug while people continued on with their constant strife.

Why were there never standards that policies had to adhere to until now?

Why were there people who fell through the cracks under a pre-condition clause, which included new born babies?
Why were caps allowed and reached at a time before people finished their therapy, suddenly found themselves in a freefall to death. No so called "death panels" then?