oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Look at these rules and then apply some of them to what liberals on the forum do when they get into an argument. A couple of them fit so well on the Chief Name Caller of the forum and most people see it every day. I have been watching them perform for over 12 years and these rules fit them so well.

8 Simple Rules Liberals Use For Arguments

1. Blame Bush, Limbaugh, Palin etc.
2. Change the subject.
3. Attack the poster.
4. Call the other person names.
5. Log on using different names and have a bunch of f**e people say you are right.
6. Find something personal about the poster to claim he has no credibility (but ignore the point).
7. Claim the source of the data is unreliable (again, ignore the point).
8. Send you a personal email to try to intimidate you.

Dave Loc: Upstate New York

You missed one - do not allow common sense into the argument - it will always destroy you.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

What you say is very true.

Concerned Montanan

I sent someone proof that a remark "Reagan did it" was wrong and his/her comment was "that is beside the point." It is almost impossible to get beyond the big "D" in the rationality of people like this.

Dave Loc: Upstate New York

Not sure I understand either your reference or your point.

Concerned Montanan

Just giving another excuse used by a liberal. "It's beside the point." The particular subject referred to was when the libs excused some girl's likening v****g to sex by claiming that Reagan did it. His remark, which I found they referred to had no sexual connotation. When I tried to tell this person the t***h, the answer was "It's beside the point." Oh, the big "D"?? Democrat. This person and others I know consider themselves such and thus, anything Obama, or any of our Demo legislators say is gospel.

tombrady

8 Simple Rules conservatives Use For Arguments

1. Blame Obama Reid Peloski etc.
2. Change the subject. like obama was born in kenya
3. Attack the poster.
4. Call the other person names.
5. Log on using different names and have a bunch of f**e people say you are right.
6. Find something personal about the poster to claim he has no credibility (but ignore the point).
7. Claim the source of the data is unreliable (again, ignore the point).
8. Send you a personal email to try to intimidate you.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

You, sir, have attempted a normal liberal trick in that you changed the first suggested method you people pull and then just copied the rest.

BTW, who is that Peloski person you mentioned? I have chapped the hindquarters of liberals for a long time by using the name, Pelos, in place of the normal BS that people use but you seem to have changed that name to a Polish sounding one.

shooterofgunmen Loc: Colorado

Good morning old Rot--how--always shout down the other person?

shooterofgunmen Loc: Colorado

Sorry Roy, complete mistake in spelling and incomplete sentence. I was momentarily distracted. I did not mean to write Rot.

Slingblade68 Loc: Charleston SC

I have not posted as regularly as I would like. I was waiting for the dust to settle on Gay Marriage and A******n. Two hot button issues to distract us from The Federal reserve and Our Nations Economy. However, that is a topic for later. What I am here to address is this (school yard) bickering. I do not necessarily agree with everything that everyone write/Post/. Furthermore I stand by my convictions. If you are able to persuade me to see another perspective , splendid. Nonetheless, we are here to exchange ideas. Those that lack conviction will fall to the wayside. I certainly do not condone a******n or Gay marriage. That is my core belief.
But I refuse to demean myself with name calling. Show some respect, even if your adversary sink to that level. Be a proud American and use our English language to set a decisive blow.

Tasine Loc: Southwest US

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Tommy, Tommy, Tommy.
You shouldn't attempt this. To do this well requires more thought than you seem to have. To do it well, requires you d**g up some terrible things that are real rather than simply t***sfer liberal traits onto conservatives. Additionally it would be more impressive if you could spell and could make fewer typos that you don't correct.

It's obvious you want a fight, but you provide nothing about which to fight. You won't meet a stronger conservative than I am, but I have never in my entire life sent an email to a liberal, let alone try to intimidate one. Intimidation is in the eye of the intimidated, did you know that? Some people cannot be intimidated, did you know that? Some people, OTOH, are intimidated if the opponent looks them in the eye. Know why? Because they cannot meet the opponent eye to eye - too weak to do so. Another thing I have never done is to log on as different posters - don't even know HOW to do it, but I'm willing to bet every l*****t knows how to do it. I've never even thought of accusing lefties of it because I didn't know it could be done - color me dumb, but don't color me liberal.

"Attack the poster". Attack is another word that is in the eye of the beholder. L*****ts think that when they are not allowed to get away with a lie, that the other party is "attacking" them, when in fact all that is being done is a correction. L*****ts have a difficult time being corrected about anything - probably anal issues from childhood, I would guess. If l*****ts could comprehend t***h for what it is instead of mule-headedly insisting that lies qualify as t***h, they wouldn't be "attacked" so often, you know? L*****ts even try to use this little "trick" in campaigns to throw the opponent off his game. It works sometimes, ergo it's not an altogether stupid method of preventing the t***h coming out. Actually it may be one of the smarter things l*****ts do, considering t***h will destroy them.

Have a good day, Tommy. Be careful because t***h lurks around every corner......and it isn't l*****t hyperbole.

oldroy Loc: Western Kansas (No longer in hiding)

Poor old Tom tried to steal my post about liberals and only changed one thing and that would be Conservative in place of liberal.

Great answer to him this is. I bet he doesn't even understand what you say from your word usage. Anyway you did an outstanding job of explaining.

mark

CONSERVATIVES ARE FILTHY BEASTS WHO REFUSE TO ACCEPT WE DEMOCRACTS WORK PAY TAXAS AND HAVE A RIGHT TO HAVE SOME SAY IN HOW THEY ARE SPENT .IN GENRAL I AVOID TALKING TO CONSERVATIVES BECAUSE I VIEW THEM AS INBREAD SAVAGES AND ONLY TALK TO NORMAL HUMANS BECAUSE CONSERVATIVES ARE TO UNCIVALIZED TO TALK TO ANYWAY .
CONSERVATIVES SIMPLY ARE UNCLEAN FILTH. THEY SCREAM INBREAD NONSENSE AT ME AND WORDS THERE KIND DON'T UNDERSTAND AND EXSPECT ME TO CARE WHAT THERE KIND HAVE TO SAY. CONSERVATIVES SIMPLY BELONG IN A ZOO.

MannyB

That one goes without saying. It's their rule number 0