One Political Plaza - Home of politics
Home Active Topics Newest Pictures Search Login Register
Understanding the Politics of America's Political Right
Doing a user mangaed site
Page <<first <prev 3 of 48 next> last>>
Jan 19, 2014 10:36:28   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
Things are pretty unbalanced. The repubs are fractureing apart. The two party system provides a balance but Radicals have thrown a wrench into the gears of our political sysyem.quote=jonhatfield]Questions--what is the meaning of the censure of John McCain for not voting straight line? That is, taking that censure as only a specific attempt to "purge" a "RINO," what is the meaning of the ongoing struggle between "establishment" GOP and the purists on the right? Is it parallel to the dispute between establishment and the Jacksonians in the 1820s? Is the Tea Party parallel to the populists of that era? The Jacksonians and populists ushered in a new partisanship era in American politics and re-set the original disagreement over more or less federal govt. action. One interpretation of the result of this partisan re-set is that one wing of Jacksonian thinking led to the extreme of secession and the Civil War. Might the Tea Party re-set of the right in politics lead to various extremes in action and reaction? For example, if GOP goes straight-line and takes office in states and/or Washington, how far would action go? Or is GOP splits, would that make opening to extreme actions pushed by the further left side of Dems? How unbalanced might politics become? How unbalanced are they already? Answers obviously would be speculative.[/quote]

Reply
Jan 19, 2014 10:45:45   #
Glaucon
 
maelstrom wrote:
These are some of the commonalities that both can find agreement on. The left, though they may be for helping through social programs, like the right ,also don't want to see programs exploited from undeserving people abusing the system. That condition will always exist and it will always have be addressed and managed.

There is plenty of waste to go around, and I think we all have a list and just like any home when things get tight look to see where the waste is coming from and cut it.

On the other hand, we don't want to see the budget for education cut, again, there are probably over expenditures here too. We don't have to spend more money to offer a better education. We're faltering here, we need observe what is working from other places, review it and incorporate what we could use, here.

One other misconception of the left from the right, and that is personal responsibility. The left would like every
American to be productive and self supportive for not only him/herself but for their entire family also.
These are some of the commonalities that both can ... (show quote)


Most liberals and conservatives would agree to the importance and support for personal responsibility, a government only large enough to fund what our citizens demand, capitalism, a strong national defense. We seem to have agreement. What is the problem?

Reply
Jan 19, 2014 10:49:23   #
Glaucon
 
fom wrote:
Things are pretty unbalanced. The repubs are fractureing apart. The two party system provides a balance but Radicals have thrown a wrench into the gears of our political sysyem.quote=jonhatfield]Questions--what is the meaning of the censure of John McCain for not voting straight line? That is, taking that censure as only a specific attempt to "purge" a "RINO," what is the meaning of the ongoing struggle between "establishment" GOP and the purists on the right? Is it parallel to the dispute between establishment and the Jacksonians in the 1820s? Is the Tea Party parallel to the populists of that era? The Jacksonians and populists ushered in a new partisanship era in American politics and re-set the original disagreement over more or less federal govt. action. One interpretation of the result of this partisan re-set is that one wing of Jacksonian thinking led to the extreme of secession and the Civil War. Might the Tea Party re-set of the right in politics lead to various extremes in action and reaction? For example, if GOP goes straight-line and takes office in states and/or Washington, how far would action go? Or is GOP splits, would that make opening to extreme actions pushed by the further left side of Dems? How unbalanced might politics become? How unbalanced are they already? Answers obviously would be speculative.
Things are pretty unbalanced. The repubs are fract... (show quote)
[/quote]

Do you think this situation has about hit its highest point? The war in the Republican party is beginning to reach a point at which we will face total gridlock. What will bring about changes in the gerrymandering mess?

Reply
 
 
Jan 19, 2014 11:01:55   #
jonhatfield Loc: Green Bay, WI
 
Another question and one I have no information on. Politics in other Western countries are also right and left (oops, that should include further east and south countries--Japan, South Korea, Australia, India, Israel, Latin America, etc...self govt. is extended and developing), so is the partisanship between right and left so sharp in Western Europe countries, for example? Is there any equivalent on the right side of their politics of our Tea Party pushing the right side party further right? What are the left and right in eastern European countries formerly Communist? Is two party politics developing in Russia? Is the present Russia governing party right wing or left wing or just plain dictatorship? That is, how does our political partisanship situation compare in the larger picture of self-govt. nations? Are our politics spiraling out of control from extremist trends unique to us, or is this a problem in various "western" nations?

Reply
Jan 19, 2014 11:02:01   #
Glaucon
 
fom wrote:
[The Surfer was paid to make his statements. Check it out it was a scam. Sure there are scammers and they do occasionaly get caught. More oversite is needed but folks wanting to trim government prevent it through lack of funding.quote=AuntiE]The Republicans are offended by the failure of the agency's responsible for payment of food stamps not adequately investigating fraud. Each agency, supposedly, has an investigative division. The best example of a failure to perform their duties was the YouTube Video of a young man from CA admitting he was on food stamps and other social services benefits who was physically able to work. He freely admitted he did not want to and spent his days surfing and such. If even one fourth of the fraudulent recipients were caught, there would be sufficient benefits for those truly in need. The system needs more checks and balances. There have been, unsubstantiated, statements there are individuals who are earning good money and receiving these benefits. They are able to scam the system by working for cash. Every dollar they steal, and it is theft, is less available for those truly in need.

It was Harry Reid in the Senate who would not vote on the three month extension for unemployment benefits.
The Surfer was paid to make his statements. Check... (show quote)
[/quote]

I believe fraud in our welfare programs is minimal, but there will always be some. We will hear of Reagan's "welfare queen" and like anecdotal reports. However, I support the stiffest penalties for welfare fraud and I support funding for monitoring to prevent and punish it. I still become furious when I read Reagan's mythical welfare queen.

Reply
Jan 19, 2014 11:03:34   #
Glaucon
 
Glaucon wrote:
Do you think this situation has about hit its highest point? The war in the Republican party is beginning to reach a point at which we will face total gridlock. What will bring about changes in the gerrymandering mess?


Lowest point?

Reply
Jan 19, 2014 11:43:18   #
Artemis
 
AuntiE wrote:
But, it did lead to more monopolies. Several regional large banks merged or were bought, ie. Wells Fargo buying Wachovia.

Let us talk about the phrase "to big to fail". Slightly long story. I do not remember which smallish city. I read this several years ago.A local church budget committee met. They took a serious look at fees, interest rates, etc. one of the committee members mentioned the small local bank he used. They entered into discussions with the smaller bank. Obtained better rates, less fees, better customer service etc. all this occurred during the banking issue. The budget committee informed the congregants of the change, why and new better benefit. They also recommended to the congregants, where possible, to consider changing their personal accounts or business if such was applicable. End result, Bank of America closed their branch in the community, local community bank grew but still retained their business model. Hmmm...who said they cannot fail if there is a viable alternative.
But, it did lead to more monopolies. Several regio... (show quote)





Yes good point, when the power of the people can still have a chance to work. Which brings to mind, on this forum it is stated from many posters, from the right, that the left is anti-capitalism, another statement which it is simply untrue.
Their are many independents and democrats, who are completely 100% for capitalism, but capitalism unrestricted is riding a horse without reins.

Capitalism, in its idealized form is a wonderful thing, for awhile there it seemed to be working really great. Then the turn started and the curve took hold. Why?, because through the pure nature of capitalism, its one single purpose is to make more money. As companies grew so did their staff of lawyers and accountants working for them, for just that purpose. "People" soon became considered a commodity or property. We than saw the wall of business ethics that we had been building beginning to erode away. People who were just about to receive their benefits after twenty five or more years, were simply let go, with nothing but a pink slip.

Finally we saw the panicle of this erosion back when Enron was exposed...
What have we put in place since than? We cannot depend on the moral fortitude of capitalism and its zest to make money guide us in our business practices. People need to be protected, who fights for them? Our laws are what protects them, protects us.

The extreme right, who are mostly for big business and and unrestrained capitalism, spends millions for this purpose, they fight our government at every turn and endlessly demeans it. They want its people to turn their backs, and not listen.
If one turns their back on our government, than they simultaneously turn it on their country, because our government is who we are.

Reply
 
 
Jan 19, 2014 11:50:54   #
Artemis
 
jonhatfield wrote:
Hi again, AuntiE. Oh, and Hi, Tassine.


Gee Jon little favoritism there, thanks pal

Reply
Jan 19, 2014 12:02:06   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
The republican struggle is going to be worse before it gets better.Gridlock shall remain until Our president hands the leadership of our nation to a new president at the end of his term.Never have I seen so much disrespect toward the presidency.Whatever is said President Obama and his family have a lot of courage to stand up to every abuse with dignity. The gerrymandering mess is going to be decided by the law. thank you for your questions
Glaucon wrote:
Do you think this situation has about hit its highest point? The war in the Republican party is beginning to reach a point at which we will face total gridlock. What will bring about changes in the gerrymandering mess?

Reply
Jan 19, 2014 12:03:24   #
Artemis
 
Glaucon wrote:
A researcher named Jost did a summary of the research studies of differences between self labeled liberals and self labeled conservatives conducted over the past thirty years. The studies were in considerable agreement that the groups were different in many ways. The summary is on the internet.

As I read your thoughts, the question comes to mind that if the meaning conservatism and liberalism have changed over the years, how would this affect the research over thirty years?

research done over the past thirty years differences between self labeled liberals and self labeled conservatives
A researcher named Jost did a summary of the resea... (show quote)



I for one have a problem with labels to begin with because it segments people into stereotypes. In conclusion it really bothers me that we've now shrunken into two basic groups, left and right, liberal-conservative. Again why I have said all should be independent and cancel parties all together. It is only used as a tool to pin people against each other.
The article I read, went back to the beginnings of our government, if any one would care for the link I think I can still find it, it was neutral to party's and very interesting.

Reply
Jan 19, 2014 12:03:34   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
Courage is a very neccessary trait to be a leader

Reply
 
 
Jan 19, 2014 12:09:28   #
Artemis
 
Glaucon wrote:
Most liberals and conservatives would agree to the importance and support for personal responsibility, a government only large enough to fund what our citizens demand, capitalism, a strong national defense. We seem to have agreement. What is the problem?


There isn't a problem here, it is out there on the OPP where the common agreements disappear, and accusations fly. I guess I just wanted to reestablish this premise among reasonable people.

Reply
Jan 19, 2014 12:09:41   #
Coos Bay Tom Loc: coos bay oregon
 
Labels are just a form of the skin game.
maelstrom wrote:
I for one have a problem with labels to begin with because it segments people into stereotypes. In conclusion it really bothers me that we've now shrunken into two basic groups, left and right, liberal-conservative. Again why I have said all should be independent and cancel parties all together. It is only used as a tool to pin people against each other.
The article I read, went back to the beginnings of our government, if any one would care for the link I think I can still find it, it was neutral to party's and very interesting.
I for one have a problem with labels to begin with... (show quote)

Reply
Jan 19, 2014 12:16:28   #
Artemis
 
[quote=fom]Republicans today run on some hardline ideas. In Oregon we had a hardliner Dudley run for govenor. The main thing he pushed was reducing state minimum wage to $5.00 per hour. He nearly won. How folks can be attracted by that kind of disregard for workers is beyond me. Scott Walker busted wisconsins public employee union Rick Scott got mandatory drug testing for those on assistance in Florida. What about stand your ground laws voter i d laws and gerrymandering congressional districts?


To me the republicans want to become our dictators.[/quote
You are not alone in this thought.

Reply
Jan 19, 2014 12:16:30   #
emarine
 
Glaucon wrote:
Do you think this situation has about hit its highest point? The war in the Republican party is beginning to reach a point at which we will face total gridlock. What will bring about changes in the gerrymandering mess?


Gerrymandering should be a crime... it will convert the states to a rigid red or blue ideology ignoring the free voice of the people within.... The destruction of balance and free election...The destruction of democracy...

Reply
Page <<first <prev 3 of 48 next> last>>
If you want to reply, then register here. Registration is free and your account is created instantly, so you can post right away.
Understanding the Politics of America's Political Right
OnePoliticalPlaza.com - Forum
Copyright 2012-2024 IDF International Technologies, Inc.