One Political PlazaSM - Home of politics
Home | Political Digest | Active Topics | Newest Pictures | Search | Login | Register | Help
Posts for: Loki
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 2498 next>>
Apr 25, 2018 17:03:08   #
Abel wrote:
Don't need to take a picture of you, we know what you look like - - inside and out. You're a childish mental midget with a "selfie complex" waving his mentality flag. One can tell a libchild, but can't tell'm much, particularly since what few brain cells they have have been washed of any means of individual thought processing. Get your mommy to change your diaper and go back to sleep.

It's not the brainwashing. The problem lies in the fact that after their brains are washed, they remove them and iron all those unsightly wrinkles out of the cortices.
Apr 25, 2018 17:00:33   #
Rarewein wrote:
When any judge beers from the Constitution and or the laws that are legitimately on the books and chooses to follow their opinion they had defrauded their office and made a farse of our system.

Once more; The Supreme Court, in Elk v Wilkins 1884, ruled that John Elk was NOT a birth citizen of the US even though born on US soil. The biggest reason was that his parents were not citizens. While the legal fiction of birth citizenship is being pushed, it flies in the face of Supreme Court rulings.
Apr 25, 2018 07:36:26   #
ACP45 wrote:
Read Loki's post by one of the commenters in that article. See if that makes any sense to you.

Waste of time.
Apr 25, 2018 07:04:45   #
ACP45 wrote:
Great response Loki.

As I said, it was written by someone else. I wish I had written it.
Apr 25, 2018 06:28:54   #
emarine wrote:
Paying 1200 for a cooler is insane to begin with... ice is cheep

My $50 cooler keeps ice for about 36 hours if I don't constantly open it. At a buck a bag for ice. I would have to go camping for 766 and one half days to make up the $1150 difference. If someone would be so kind as to pay my bills, cut my grass and feed my chickens while I am gone, I would certainly be willing to give it a try.
Apr 25, 2018 06:18:21   #
rumitoid wrote:
Justice is still alive in America. Can I hear an Amen?

How about a raspberry for yet another Liberal Hobbit Dancer who has no idea that race and nationality are two entirely different things? Since when is Guatemalan or Honduran a "race?"
Personally I'm worried about the racism being shown to Canadians and Norwegians.
I commend you though. I'll bet you heaved a sigh of relief when that poor, innocent put upon victim of racism, Jose Zarate, was acquitted of the obviously bogus charge of murdering Kate Steinle. After all, it's racist to try and convict a poor wetback drug addict of possessing a firearm while not only committing a felony, but being a convicted felon. Laws like that should only be appled to white taxpayers.
Poor, innocent criminals should not be punished for breaking our laws, after all, our laws are RAAAAACIIIIIIIST!
You want justice? Good. Let the DACA recipients, (AFTER their illegal parents are deported) take their place in the BACK of the line behind the million plus Mexican citizens who are patiently waiting to obtain US citizenship the old-fashioned way.....Lawfully.
You think it's justice when lawbreakers are allowed to flaunt US law and ignore the legal immigrants.
Typical Liberal.
Apr 25, 2018 05:58:54   #
PeterS wrote:
The despicable's are at it again...

Now go get a job earning minimum wage and stop bitching...

I read your link. I have taken the liberty of posting a comment on that link by someone calling themselves mike the organist. I couldn't have said it better.

"So we see two things ... (1) Unconstitutional laws are nothing new, with the federal government taking powers not granted to it, and (2) the Senator does not know how to get across what he is trying to say.
So let me say it for him. Rights are contained within the individual and do not require anyone else to supply them. If it's benefits you want, SAY SO and use the correct term, then amend the laws that govern the government so that such a power is formally granted. Rights are one's ability to use one's own natural faculties in any manner one wishes as long as the natural rights of others are not infringed thereby. Benefits are the supplying by one person, or by the whole of the population via central command and control, of the needs of a person who can't, or won't do for himself. I get it that you want benefits. Grant the power, by means of the mechanism provided in the Constitution. and you can have them.
We have been saying for a long, long, time, that if people have needs, the federal government can assume power to take care of those needs. Unfortunately, this means it can assume power to do bad things as well, because the people are unwilling to check it through their representatives because they want the benefits more than they fear the assumption of power.
One other thing. The right to life is the right to live out one's time here on this earth as long as his own body will allow. It does NOT include a claim on others to provide sustenance. If it's benefits you want, say so. Please do not think there's a claim on others to provide rights.
In order to properly understand rights, it's needful to understand the difference between natural rights and benefits (especially benefits whose purveyors call them rights). Natural rights come from natural law that was put on this Creation by a Creator. Those rights exist even if they're suppressed. Benefits come from people holding power or who run businesses. They only exist as long as the people who say they exist say they do."

I would add to this that with rights come responsibilities. Should you think that you are being denied a right, you have the responsibility to take action to correct the situation, by peacefully petitioning the government for redress of grievances.
Apr 23, 2018 15:25:52   #
maryla wrote:
Rumatoid: The insinuation equates Hitler with Trump..This is incorrect thinking which I think you've tried to spout before. The 2 characters are sooo different in their mindsets...

Unlike Adolf Shicklegruber and Hillary von Pantsuit.
Apr 23, 2018 15:19:44   #
woodguru wrote:
...if they just called a spade a spade where his character is concerned.

The guy filled the media for years before he ran as president, and the news was not of the flattering type...

Trump University, you think he offered a great service? Do you think the stories about how he operated that gave credibility to fraud charges were fabricated by a deep state that was out to get him? He was a target for fraud allegations from the fact that he was not even a university and had no right to call his
school" such.

His casinos. following the story of his rapid escalation to bankruptcy, borrowing hundreds of millions that was stripped off while building accounts payable, is this the portrait of a competent businessman? Do you think the stories of his mob connections are also deep state fabrications by a mysterious entity that was out to get the great man even back then? Also when there were 200 violations of illegal involvement with known organized crime figures, how is it possible to not think he was in the organized crime relationship up to his eyeballs. The helicopters he used to go back and forth between Atlantic City and New York were owned by a mob boss.

Prior to his run for president, he and his sons made no bones about the fact that they were involved in a disproportionate amount of Russian backing and real estate sales. So how can supporters have any credibility if they can't at least say "so what?", as opposed to fake news, deep state is making this all up.

When you deny the things about Trump that were well covered in the media for at least a decade, and refuse to acknowledge that the guy is at the least "unsavory", you have no credibility for anything else you say as far as current events. The very worst of this is that the relentless rhetoric about ties with Russia and interference with our elections is also deep state fake news, is putting us at risk of cyber attacks that are not being dealt with.

Defend your president, but at least have the honor and decency to acknowledge what he is, it's a step toward not representing an entirely alternate universe where Trump is a decent and honorable man, that he is not.
...if they just called a spade a spade where his c... (show quote)

I see lots of accusations and not one iota of proof. Not one cite, not one link, not even from Salon or Mother Jones.
Sans proof, accusations are nothing more than unsupported opinions. Opinions are something that everyone possesses. Like something else that everyone possesses, they frequently stink.
Apr 22, 2018 12:28:04   #
Bruce Hass wrote:
I tried to alert you with an honest title. Thanks for trying.

Interdisciplinary Studies? You mean like studying Underwater Basket Weaving in the South Pacific and White Racism at the same time?
Apr 22, 2018 11:46:27   #
moldyoldy wrote:
That might apply to Cruz.

It absolutely applies to Ted Cruz. His mother was a US citizen who had lived in the US for five years after her 14th birthday. It doesn't matter where he was born. He could have been born in Uzbekistan and he would have still been a natural born US citizen. Immigration status is determined by the laws in effect at the time of birth. That's what immigration law stated when Cruz was born.
Apr 22, 2018 11:11:50   #
moldyoldy wrote:
Statute, by birth within U.S.[edit]
United States Federal law (8 U.S.C. ยง 1401) defines who is a United States citizen from birth. The following are among those listed there as persons who shall be nationals and citizens of the United States at birth:
"a person born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof" or
"a person born in the United States to a member of an Indian, Eskimo, Aleutian, or other aboriginal tribe" (see Indian Citizenship Act of 1924).
"a person of unknown parentage found in the United States while under the age of five years, until shown, prior to his attaining the age of twenty-one years, not to have been born in the United States"
"a person born in an outlying possession of the United States of parents one of whom is a citizen of the United States who has been physically present in the United States or one of its outlying possessions for a continuous period of one year at any time prior to the birth of such person"
Statute, by birth within U.S. edit br United Stat... (show quote)

Among. Not all. You conveniently forgot to mention section (g). (That is the one that comes right after the last one you listed.) It goes like this....

(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years

For those of you who are interested, simply Google 8 US Code 1401 and select "text."
Apr 22, 2018 10:36:33   #
moldyoldy wrote:
That certainly argues against all those birth hotels where new citizens are born.

They are not citizens. At least, not of the United States unless one of their parents is a citizen of the US. (8 US Code)
Apr 22, 2018 10:34:43   #
old marine wrote:
If a child is born in one of your birth hotels would that child be a citizen of the moon?

No the child would be a citizen of its parents citizenship. If like your beloved Obamms his mother was an American citizen and his father was born in Kenya a British colony making him and Obamms British Musllim citizen.

According to US Law (8 US Code) if one of your parents is an American citizen who resided in the US for a period of at least five years after their 14th Birthday, you are an American citizen by birth no matter where you are born. I believe this is found in 8 USC 1401. There was a big argument about this in the primary regarding Ted Cruz.

Semper Fi
God bless America and President Trump
If a child is born in one of your birth hotels wou... (show quote)
Apr 22, 2018 10:28:30   #
Paybacktimeishere wrote:
Why I Am No Longer A Conservative Republican?

Loki: The "Sell-Out", So-Called, "Conservative Republican's", Are On The Same "POD," Of ROTTEN,
Lead They're Way, Out Of A Giant Roll, Of "SEE-THROUGH", CELLOPHANE WRAP!!! They Are Bought & Paid For, By The K-Street, Business Round Table, & CORRUPT, "GANG OF LOBBYIST'S", Actually "RUNNING", The House &
Senate, Like It Was Some Kind Of LAS VEGAS,
"BET"; The Foul, Crooked, "STENCH Of GEORGE
TRUMP(Labeled As A MOB BOSS), Should Send
Honestly, My Opinion,
Why I Am No Longer A Conservative Republican? br ... (show quote)

You did not think this one through. YOU are still a Conservative Republican. The sellouts that you named are no longer Conservative Republicans, if they ever were.
Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 2498 next>>
Home | Latest Digest | Back to Top | All Sections
Contact us | Privacy policy | Terms of use - Forum
Copyright 2012-2018 IDF International Technologies, Inc.