Don't need to take a picture of you, we know what you look like - - inside and out. You're a childish mental midget with a "selfie complex" waving his mentality flag. One can tell a libchild, but can't tell'm much, particularly since what few brain cells they have have been washed of any means of individual thought processing. Get your mommy to change your diaper and go back to sleep.
It's not the brainwashing. The problem lies in the fact that after their brains are washed, they remove them and iron all those unsightly wrinkles out of the cortices.
When any judge beers from the Constitution and or the laws that are legitimately on the books and chooses to follow their opinion they had defrauded their office and made a farse of our system.
Once more; The Supreme Court, in Elk v Wilkins
1884, ruled that John Elk was NOT a birth citizen of the US even though born on US soil. The biggest reason was that his parents were not citizens. While the legal fiction of birth citizenship is being pushed, it flies in the face of Supreme Court rulings.
Great response Loki.
As I said, it was written by someone else. I wish I had written it.
Paying 1200 for a cooler is insane to begin with... ice is cheep
My $50 cooler keeps ice for about 36 hours if I don't constantly open it. At a buck a bag for ice. I would have to go camping for 766 and one half days to make up the $1150 difference. If someone would be so kind as to pay my bills, cut my grass and feed my chickens while I am gone, I would certainly be willing to give it a try.
Justice is still alive in America. Can I hear an Amen?
How about a raspberry for yet another Liberal Hobbit Dancer who has no idea that race and nationality are two entirely different things? Since when is Guatemalan or Honduran a "race?"
Personally I'm worried about the racism being shown to Canadians and Norwegians.
I commend you though. I'll bet you heaved a sigh of relief when that poor, innocent put upon victim of racism, Jose Zarate, was acquitted of the obviously bogus charge of murdering Kate Steinle. After all, it's racist to try and convict a poor wetback drug addict of possessing a firearm while not only committing a felony, but being a convicted felon. Laws like that should only be appled to white taxpayers.
Poor, innocent criminals should not be punished for breaking our laws, after all, our laws are RAAAAACIIIIIIIST!
You want justice? Good. Let the DACA recipients, (AFTER their illegal parents are deported) take their place in the BACK of the line behind the million plus Mexican citizens who are patiently waiting to obtain US citizenship the old-fashioned way.....Lawfully.
You think it's justice when lawbreakers are allowed to flaunt US law and ignore the legal immigrants.
I read your link. I have taken the liberty of posting a comment on that link by someone calling themselves mike the organist.
I couldn't have said it better.
*******"So we see two things ... (1) Unconstitutional laws are nothing new, with the federal government taking powers not granted to it, and (2) the Senator does not know how to get across what he is trying to say.
So let me say it for him. Rights are contained within the individual and do not require anyone else to supply them. If it's benefits you want, SAY SO and use the correct term, then amend the laws that govern the government so that such a power is formally granted. Rights are one's ability to use one's own natural faculties in any manner one wishes as long as the natural rights of others are not infringed thereby. Benefits are the supplying by one person, or by the whole of the population via central command and control, of the needs of a person who can't, or won't do for himself. I get it that you want benefits. Grant the power, by means of the mechanism provided in the Constitution. and you can have them.
We have been saying for a long, long, time, that if people have needs, the federal government can assume power to take care of those needs. Unfortunately, this means it can assume power to do bad things as well, because the people are unwilling to check it through their representatives because they want the benefits more than they fear the assumption of power.
One other thing. The right to life is the right to live out one's time here on this earth as long as his own body will allow. It does NOT include a claim on others to provide sustenance. If it's benefits you want, say so. Please do not think there's a claim on others to provide rights.
In order to properly understand rights, it's needful to understand the difference between natural rights and benefits (especially benefits whose purveyors call them rights). Natural rights come from natural law that was put on this Creation by a Creator. Those rights exist even if they're suppressed. Benefits come from people holding power or who run businesses. They only exist as long as the people who say they exist say they do."
I would add to this that with rights come responsibilities. Should you think that you are being denied a right, you have the responsibility to take action to correct the situation, by peacefully petitioning the government for redress of grievances.
Rumatoid: The insinuation equates Hitler with Trump..This is incorrect thinking which I think you've tried to spout before. The 2 characters are sooo different in their mindsets...
Unlike Adolf Shicklegruber and Hillary von Pantsuit.
...if they just called a spade a spade where his c... (
I see lots of accusations and not one iota of proof. Not one cite, not one link, not even from Salon
or Mother Jones.
Sans proof, accusations are nothing more than unsupported opinions. Opinions are something that everyone possesses. Like something else that everyone possesses, they frequently stink.
That might apply to Cruz.
It absolutely applies to Ted Cruz. His mother was a US citizen who had lived in the US for five years after her 14th birthday. It doesn't matter where he was born. He could have been born in Uzbekistan and he would have still been a natural born US citizen. Immigration status is determined by the laws in effect at the time of birth. That's what immigration law stated when Cruz was born.
Statute, by birth within U.S. edit br United Stat... (
Among. Not all. You conveniently forgot to mention section (g). (That is the one that comes right after the last one you listed.) It goes like this....(g) a person born outside the geographical limits of the United States and its outlying possessions of parents one of whom is an alien, and the other a citizen of the United States who, prior to the birth of such person, was physically present in the United States or its outlying possessions for a period or periods totaling not less than five years, at least two of which were after attaining the age of fourteen years
For those of you who are interested, simply Google 8 US Code 1401 and select "text."
That certainly argues against all those birth hotels where new citizens are born.
They are not citizens. At least, not of the United States unless one of their parents is a citizen of the US. (8 US Code)
Why I Am No Longer A Conservative Republican? br ... (
You did not think this one through. YOU are still a Conservative Republican. The sellouts that you named are no longer Conservative Republicans, if they ever were.