Governor Moonbeam Welcomes Blood Donors With HIV

That nutty bill was introduced by California State Senator Scott Wiener, a San Francisco Democrat. His name certainly fits his goals. The Wiener said that not allowing ‘gays’ to donate blood is, here we go again, “discriminatory.” This bill, according to Wiener, if passed, would also apply to people who donate semen (fertility clinics) without disclosing they have HIV or AIDS.

https://newswithviews.com/governor-moonbeam-welcomes-blood-donors-with-hiv/

I care about the lives of innocent babies. >>> We all do in different intensities.
Apparently, you and others on here, do not. >>> You have no idea how we care.
As for your question about what gives me the right...It's called free speech, baby. >>> To speech, yes. To force, no.
I will defend the lives of the innocent, even if you will not. >>> The woman who is raped is innocent. Who are you to force her to that servitude for nine months because you have made an imperial decision.

And on this subject you are still an asshole.

The only excuse for abortion is if there is a credible threat to the mothers' life. >>> Such as suicide rather then carry a rapist's bastard that beat her senseless and blind.

That is the only excuse I'll accept. >>> Who the hell are you to set yourself up as the authority to accept of reject?

Rape, emotional distress, or one's own convenience does not cut it. >>> And neither does an asshole lecturing a poor woman who was beaten and raped and left for dead with a bastard to carry for nine months.

We're talking about a human life here. >>> Yes. And now it is hers. But you show yourself to be an utter asshole in lecturing her and chastising her for something that is long done. Just who do you think you are, God's personal messenger.

It's sickening how some people consider a fetus nothing but a disease or something to get rid of just because you don't want it. >>> It's also sickening how some people consider themselves as having the right to force a woman to carry a fetus she had no active part in creating.

Millions of babies have been murdered simply because a woman can't keep her pants on. >>> But how many women got pregnant because in trying to keep her pants on, some rapist shoved a rifle up her cunt and also shot her full of sperm while beating her senseless and blind. You would force her to accept something that someone jammed into her body without her consent.

Who's fault is that? >>> Certainly not our resident sanctimonious moralizer waving his damn bible.

And your attitude still makes you an asshole on this subject.

I vote for falsifiability as a tool to be used in the process of examining a proposed theory, but only as a tool, not necessarily a theory-killer. If you cannot yet figure out how to bring a theory into the testability domain, the lack of F-Testability is cautionary, but merely that. If you can perform an F-Test, you have a more confident idea of the worth of the theory.
Interesting that Tegmark was mentioned. I have been plowing through his book now and then, but he is not an easy read for me!

I vote for falsifiability as a tool to be used in the process of examining a proposed theory, but only as a tool, not necessarily a theory-killer. If you cannot yet figure out how to bring a theory into the testability domain, the lack of F-Testability is cautionary, but merely that. If you can perform an F-Test, you have a more confident idea of the worth of the theory.
Interesting that Tegmark was mentioned. I have been plowing through his book now and then, but he is not an easy read for me!