I have a similar question; Why should they? I lost my house in hurricane Wilma in 2005. We were doing just fine until the western side of the eye-wall hit, then the roof was gone in a heartbeat, right from over our heads (October 22nd, Boynton Beach, Florida. Look it up). We had four hurricanes in 2004 without even so much as a damaged screen. The insurance had lapsed just a month previously because my insurer wanted a 25% increase that I was definitely not going to pony up. You see, they thought they had me over a barrel due to mortgage requirements, but I had no mortgage. Big oops on their part. Three weeks later there's a cat. 5 tearing up the Yucatan and headed straight for us. Nobody went out of their way to build me a new one. Three hundred grand straight down the Suwanee. So no, no insurance, no bailout. That's what insurance is for.

That makes way too much sense. The idea that the IRS is there to oversee the tax collection system means nothing to those who will grab at any tiny opportunity to twist and turn any fact or admission until it is a capital offense. Fact; There is no requirement for him to release his personal financial information to anyone. Period. Further fact: The IRS would have taken him to the cleaners if he was found wanting in his submission to their rules, regulations, codes and legal requirements, all 74,608 pages of them (as of April 15, 2016, it may be more now). Resulting logical conclusions: He will not release his returns, there is no requirement to explain his decision and and those who keep harping on about it can go pound sand.

By the way, I hear that there's going to be an impeachment now that the Democrats have the majority in the House. No word yet on what crime has been committed to justify such an action but there's a good chance that no crime will be required to garner sufficient votes to send the articles to the Senate where it will, of course be duly laughed at. When will they grow up?

I found this, thought it might 'float your boat':

Scary stuff. Imagine this:

That's the nature of witch hunts. When they don't find anything pertaining to the original mandate, they go all over the map to find something, anything, to justify their time. It would be laughable if it weren't so openly seditious.

Alright! Yeah! I'll get the popcorn, you put the beers in the cooler. We'll watch it on TV. Remember 'shock and awe'? This'll be even better!

Monday January 20, 2025 will be the last day of his wildly successful second term. That will be when President Nikki Haley takes over and picks up where President Trump leaves off, continuing the good work and adding President Trump's 'MAGA Memorial' to the National Mall and a grateful nation petitions to have his image printed on the $1 billion bill.

Yes, your back, and your front, and feeling loquacoius I see ("...intellectual Lilliputian of questionable probity whose claimed parentage would probably not survive a careful scrutiny." Seriously?)

So, why is that?

Hi Maryjane. Loki got a week in the cooler for calling someone a bad name so he asked me to post this for him to you:

"You are apparently misinformed about the NRA's opposition to any gun control. They were the main proponents of the current instant background check that is responsible for catching literally thousands of prohibited buyers. They pushed hard for an updated computerized base of criminals and prohibited people.
The NRA supports very stiff penalties for crimes committed with firearms, which has been proven repeatedly to be an effective deterrent.
The NRA opposes useless and redundant laws that are nearly impossible to implement and enforce properly. For instance, there IS no "gun show loophole. Only about 2% of guns sold at these shows are bought from a private individual. I have yet to see the first report of one of these guns being used in a crime by the purchaser.
You cannot regulate private firearms sales effectively.
How 3 ten round magazines are less dangerous than one 30 is an interesting question, particularly when the 10 rounders are more reliable.
This is the tip of the iceberg. The NRA supports many common sense, workable solutions to gun violence. They just limit their support to those proposals that are doable and workable.."

If you reply he'll be able to see it but will probably need me to post if he wants to continue the conversation.

Why's that?

Why would the National Rifle Association 'care' about 'gun industry' industry profits? They have no dog in that fight.

Remember this?

http://www.onepoliticalplaza.com/t-119126-1.html

Now this:

https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/18/markets-dont-care-about-trumps-twitter-meltdown--futures-basically-indicate-a-flat-open.html

"Part of me worries retail investors are selling out of the ETFs they bought to get FANG exposure," said Kim Forrest, senior equity analyst at Fort Pitt Capital. "That could bring down the entire complex."

Don't say you didn't know.

Since this is the 'last of the line', Here's one I just adore:

If that's what you want to believe. It's people like you who make me wish we could make idiocy a crime. Where did you ever pick up such a cockamamie tale anyway? Oh, and by the way, in 1789? They were all 'slave states'.

What a jackass.