working class stiff wrote:
Perhaps you did not read my opening sentence in my reply to you. I'm not one who wants to get rid of the electoral college. The House, however, is the appropriate venue for 'the people' to raise their voice. Right now the House is reigning in a President. That's it's job, in the republic.
My comments are neither stupid, nor straw men. They are an observation of the chaos around me.
Perhaps I misunderstood. Are you trying, like many to say Trump is an illegitimate President because he didn't win the popular vote? I mean, I really don't understand the reasoning, especially if you are for the Electoral college. The House, is supposed to be the voice of the people. Exactly why the Founders (especially Hamilton) was against impeaching a President along purely party lines. Question: You are obviously "up" on the politics in Washington. Why in the world was this impeachment so urgent (Pelosi's words and others) then rushed through, and now held up? do you not see a conflict of statement and action here?