Why are you a hypocrite? Because you say the same things about me, as you cliam I say about you. You have no more proof of what you say, as I have of what I say. But we know that the AntiFa and BLM wore bandana masks to hide their identities and armed themselves for a plan confrontation, just as they had done at Berkeley, and now at the Chicago court house where they attacked the Chicago police, just as they did in Berkley, and whether you want to admit it or not, just as they did in Charlottesville, and then you bring up about, "Can't see the forest for the trees," which descibes you perfectly, and you do it prejudicially, not accidently and unaware, because I have made facts known to you that you refuse to take into account in your decision of who the guilty party was that started the violence and riot in Charlottesville, which any intelligent person could surmize to be the same groups that started the violence at Berkley and the Chicago court house, who came dressed and armed the same way at all three sites, masked to hide their identities and armed for the confrontation that they planned. I've asked you, but you refuse to answer, why the AntiFa and BLM came masked with bandanas, and armed for a confrontation, to a peaceful protest march in all three places, Berkley, Charlottesville, and now the Chicago court house, and why did all three places end up in violent riots that had to be put down by the police, and the alt-right were only at one of those sites, doing everything legally by the book, just to have a rally, not a protest, or a confrontation?
The person you hold responsible for the Charlottesville riots was a Democratic advocate that worked in high places in both of Obama's elections, so why is he now associating with these alt-right groups? Is it any part of Obama's and the Democrats' plan to try to destroy President Trump by stirring up civil unrest between the detestable white supremist & KKK, with the detestable AntiFa & BLM, who call for the murder of police officers and white people, as they come to every event or protest masked and armed to the teeth, as every event and protest they attend is turned into a violent riot, where public and private property is destroyed, and people that don't agree with them are physically attacked and assaulted, and if you're not involved in their riot, and just standing there watching, then you are not in agreement with them, and are subject to physical attacks and assaults by them, and then you mention that I can't see the forest for the trees, have you looked in a mirror lately?
Take your BS to someone else, I don't believe a word you say, as you ignore facts, so as to blame the ones you hate the most, then you say that I'm filled with hate, anger, and biased, again look in the mirror. When the riot first took place, it was reported that the AntiFa and BLM had no permit, but after the event, they came up with one from the liberal biased city government of Charlottesville, so the police would only have to arrest those they consider the haters, that supposedly started the violent riot, and not the liberal advocates that the Democrats have embraced, the AntiFa and BLM, whose modus operandi has been proven by the latest three violent riots that they attended, masked with bandanas to hide their identities and armed for a confrontation.
I detest both sides for their beliefs, but I would not attack any of them, unless they attacked me first, then I'd do as that US Army SgtMaj did, that was going to a planned speech, but was attacked by over 100 AntiFa and BLM members when leaving his car, and he beat the shit out of as many as he could get his hands on. He put 26 of them in the hospital, and physically hurt another estimated 50, and the AntiFa and BLM members were only saved by the police getting their to arrest many of their members for starting a riot and assaulting this SgtMaj, who was also arrested to protect the other Antifa and BLM members that he hadn't gotten to yet. But the SgtMaj was released and thanked when he got to the police station, and was escorted back to his car, after the police chief offered him a job training his police force in hand to hand combat in a year later, when his retirement was coming up.
AntiFa and BLM, again masked, armed, and attacking someone who had done nothing to them, but was going to give a speech in favor of joining the US military. I would even fight for the detestible Antifa and BLM right to march peacefully, if they would ever really plan on doing that, as I now back the peaceful rally marchers who were first attacked and assaulted by the masked and armed AntiFa and BLM, but too agressively defended themselves. But I really can't blame them for agrresively defending themselves, because I would done the same if I were also attacked and assaulted, as the rally marchers were. And something that you can't understand is that no matter what their reason for their planned rally march, just because you like to label them as haters and detestibles, but not the Antifa and BLM groups because they are liberal advocates, they still have the right to do what they were given a permit for, no matter what anyone thinks of them, they're still American citizens. That's the difference between you and I, you want to blame those you hate the most, why I want to protect the rights of those being attacked, no matter how detestible they are, they are still Americans and have the right to exercise their freedoms legally and safely, without being attacked because some people want to call them haters, and should be done away with.
Why do I keep repeating myself, because you refuse to accept the truth that I put right under your nose, and haven't given me a reason that those who you champion, come to peaceful protests with bandana masks to hide their identities, and armed to the teeth for confrontations, and every event and protest they attend, have always ended up in violent riots with public and private property being destroyed, and innocent people being physically harmed through their attacks and assaults on all who don't agree with them or their agenda. But you blame those who went out of their way to abide by the law to have a peaceful rally in support for our national historical statues and monuments, a cause that the huge majority of southern Americans are for, in disguise for their true intention of causing a violent riot, which there are no trees for that forest, that you surmise only because of your hatred for that group.
slatten49 wrote:
Since you saw fit to repeat your rebuttal, I shall submit the same response I had earlier in this thread directed to you. But first, I will point out that the clear purpose of my last two posts was to show that Jason Kessler was the driving force behind the 'Unite The Right' group that gathered in Charlottesville. His history is definitely shady. You clearly deflected away from the intent of my post and continue to deny that both sides were there legally by permit, even if not legitimately in intent. Take from that what you will. I am no hypocrite, but you surely are a denier.
Otherwise....
Randy, is there any limit to the assumptions/presumptions that you foster without basis? Your perception of me, for instance, is so far off base that it boggles my mind. The only protestors I would defend in the Charlottesville riots were the non-violent ones from either/both sides. The basic cut 'n paste I posted was to point out your falling short of the truth in your earlier comments that only one side of the protestors had a permit. If you had read and comprehended all of the article, you would know that is not true. You are such a frenetic case of simmering anger and bias that you (as the old saying goes) can't see the forest for the trees. I will not dignify your assumptions of me by responding to your attacks on what you perceive as my views/beliefs on the entire matter of Charlottesville. You seem to have determined that all on your own, magically.
Defending the truth is not the same as defending any individuals in this or any matter. As I stated at the beginning of the post you are responding to here, the article clearly points out what I posted it for: Both sides had permits, yet in response to the purpose of my post, you totally avoided your misstatements from your earlier posts/comments about permits.
Since you saw fit to repeat your rebuttal, I shall... (
show quote)